尿液可溶性 CD163 可作为狼疮肾炎的 "液体活检 "标记物,在诊断和随访时预测即将复发的病情

IF 4.7 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Journal of Translational Autoimmunity Pub Date : 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jtauto.2024.100244
Yves Renaudineau , Dominique Chauveau , Stanislas Faguer , Antoine Huart , David Ribes , Gregory Pugnet , Laurent Sailler , Thibaut Jamme , Emmanuel Treiner , Françoise Fortenfant , Chloé Bost , Caroline Carlé , Julie Belliere
{"title":"尿液可溶性 CD163 可作为狼疮肾炎的 \"液体活检 \"标记物,在诊断和随访时预测即将复发的病情","authors":"Yves Renaudineau ,&nbsp;Dominique Chauveau ,&nbsp;Stanislas Faguer ,&nbsp;Antoine Huart ,&nbsp;David Ribes ,&nbsp;Gregory Pugnet ,&nbsp;Laurent Sailler ,&nbsp;Thibaut Jamme ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Treiner ,&nbsp;Françoise Fortenfant ,&nbsp;Chloé Bost ,&nbsp;Caroline Carlé ,&nbsp;Julie Belliere","doi":"10.1016/j.jtauto.2024.100244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Lupus nephritis (LN) diagnosis and follow-up requires noninvasive biomarkers. Therefore, the added value of coupling the urinary soluble (s)CD163/creatinuria ratio with serological markers was evaluated in a real-world clinical practice. To this end, a monocentric and retrospective study was conducted in 139 SLE patients with biopsy-proven nephritis having an active LN (LN-A, n = 63 with a positive SLEDAI-renal score) or inactive (n = 76), as well as 98 non-renal SLE patients. The urinary sCD163/creatinuria ratio outperformed serological markers for predicting LN-A (AUC&gt;0.972; p &lt; 10<sup>−4</sup> with a 100 % specificity threshold fixed at 320 ng/mmol), and for monitoring renal activity allowing prediction of impending flares and remissions in follow-up (AUC = 0.789, p &lt; 10<sup>−4</sup>). LN-A patients with an elevated spot proteinuria/creatinuria ratio (p = 8 × 10<sup>−6</sup>) and sCD163/creatinuria ratio (p = 10<sup>−3</sup>) were at risk for developing end-stage kidney disease but sCD163/creatinuria ratio cannot substitute kidney biopsy to discriminate LN-A from other glomerulonephritis. Among serological markers (n = 14), anti-dsDNA and anti-C1q antibodies (Abs) (AUC&gt;0.750 versus non-LN patients, and AUC&gt;0.640 versus LN-IR patients) best predicted LN-A, and higher levels were retrieved in class III/IV proliferative LN-A. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the urinary sCD163/creatinuria ratio remained the only statistically significant biomarker to predict LN-A (p &lt; 0.001). In conclusion, and as compared to classical serological markers, the urinary sCD163/creatinuria ratio provides an additional parameter for monitoring LN patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Translational Autoimmunity","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100244"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589909024000145/pdfft?md5=5f6c05181e41d12b1f58ed7baadf5037&pid=1-s2.0-S2589909024000145-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urinary soluble CD163 is useful as “liquid biopsy” marker in lupus nephritis at both diagnosis and follow-up to predict impending flares\",\"authors\":\"Yves Renaudineau ,&nbsp;Dominique Chauveau ,&nbsp;Stanislas Faguer ,&nbsp;Antoine Huart ,&nbsp;David Ribes ,&nbsp;Gregory Pugnet ,&nbsp;Laurent Sailler ,&nbsp;Thibaut Jamme ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Treiner ,&nbsp;Françoise Fortenfant ,&nbsp;Chloé Bost ,&nbsp;Caroline Carlé ,&nbsp;Julie Belliere\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtauto.2024.100244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Lupus nephritis (LN) diagnosis and follow-up requires noninvasive biomarkers. Therefore, the added value of coupling the urinary soluble (s)CD163/creatinuria ratio with serological markers was evaluated in a real-world clinical practice. To this end, a monocentric and retrospective study was conducted in 139 SLE patients with biopsy-proven nephritis having an active LN (LN-A, n = 63 with a positive SLEDAI-renal score) or inactive (n = 76), as well as 98 non-renal SLE patients. The urinary sCD163/creatinuria ratio outperformed serological markers for predicting LN-A (AUC&gt;0.972; p &lt; 10<sup>−4</sup> with a 100 % specificity threshold fixed at 320 ng/mmol), and for monitoring renal activity allowing prediction of impending flares and remissions in follow-up (AUC = 0.789, p &lt; 10<sup>−4</sup>). LN-A patients with an elevated spot proteinuria/creatinuria ratio (p = 8 × 10<sup>−6</sup>) and sCD163/creatinuria ratio (p = 10<sup>−3</sup>) were at risk for developing end-stage kidney disease but sCD163/creatinuria ratio cannot substitute kidney biopsy to discriminate LN-A from other glomerulonephritis. Among serological markers (n = 14), anti-dsDNA and anti-C1q antibodies (Abs) (AUC&gt;0.750 versus non-LN patients, and AUC&gt;0.640 versus LN-IR patients) best predicted LN-A, and higher levels were retrieved in class III/IV proliferative LN-A. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the urinary sCD163/creatinuria ratio remained the only statistically significant biomarker to predict LN-A (p &lt; 0.001). In conclusion, and as compared to classical serological markers, the urinary sCD163/creatinuria ratio provides an additional parameter for monitoring LN patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Translational Autoimmunity\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100244\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589909024000145/pdfft?md5=5f6c05181e41d12b1f58ed7baadf5037&pid=1-s2.0-S2589909024000145-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Translational Autoimmunity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589909024000145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Translational Autoimmunity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589909024000145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

狼疮性肾炎(LN)的诊断和随访需要无创生物标志物。因此,我们在实际临床实践中评估了尿可溶性(s)CD163/肌酐尿比值与血清学标志物相结合的附加值。为此,我们对 139 名经活检证实患有活动性 LN(LN-A,n = 63,SLEDAI-肾脏评分为阳性)或非活动性(n = 76)肾炎的系统性红斑狼疮患者,以及 98 名非肾脏病系统性红斑狼疮患者进行了单中心回顾性研究。在预测LN-A(AUC>0.972; p <10-4,100%特异性阈值固定为320纳克/毫摩尔)和监测肾脏活动方面,尿液sCD163/肌酐尿量比值优于血清学标记物(AUC = 0.789, p <10-4)。斑点蛋白尿/肌酐尿比值升高(p = 8 × 10-6)和 sCD163/肌酐尿比值升高(p = 10-3)的 LN-A 患者有发展为终末期肾病的风险,但 sCD163/肌酐尿比值不能替代肾活检来区分 LN-A 和其他肾小球肾炎。在血清学标记物(n = 14)中,抗dsDNA和抗C1q抗体(Abs)(与非LN患者相比,AUC>0.750;与LN-IR患者相比,AUC>0.640)最能预测LN-A,在III/IV级增生性LN-A中,Abs水平更高。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,尿 sCD163/肌酐尿比值仍是预测 LN-A 的唯一具有统计学意义的生物标志物(p <0.001)。总之,与传统的血清学标志物相比,尿液中的 sCD163/肌酐比值为监测 LN 患者提供了一个额外的参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Urinary soluble CD163 is useful as “liquid biopsy” marker in lupus nephritis at both diagnosis and follow-up to predict impending flares

Lupus nephritis (LN) diagnosis and follow-up requires noninvasive biomarkers. Therefore, the added value of coupling the urinary soluble (s)CD163/creatinuria ratio with serological markers was evaluated in a real-world clinical practice. To this end, a monocentric and retrospective study was conducted in 139 SLE patients with biopsy-proven nephritis having an active LN (LN-A, n = 63 with a positive SLEDAI-renal score) or inactive (n = 76), as well as 98 non-renal SLE patients. The urinary sCD163/creatinuria ratio outperformed serological markers for predicting LN-A (AUC>0.972; p < 10−4 with a 100 % specificity threshold fixed at 320 ng/mmol), and for monitoring renal activity allowing prediction of impending flares and remissions in follow-up (AUC = 0.789, p < 10−4). LN-A patients with an elevated spot proteinuria/creatinuria ratio (p = 8 × 10−6) and sCD163/creatinuria ratio (p = 10−3) were at risk for developing end-stage kidney disease but sCD163/creatinuria ratio cannot substitute kidney biopsy to discriminate LN-A from other glomerulonephritis. Among serological markers (n = 14), anti-dsDNA and anti-C1q antibodies (Abs) (AUC>0.750 versus non-LN patients, and AUC>0.640 versus LN-IR patients) best predicted LN-A, and higher levels were retrieved in class III/IV proliferative LN-A. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the urinary sCD163/creatinuria ratio remained the only statistically significant biomarker to predict LN-A (p < 0.001). In conclusion, and as compared to classical serological markers, the urinary sCD163/creatinuria ratio provides an additional parameter for monitoring LN patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Translational Autoimmunity
Journal of Translational Autoimmunity Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
33
审稿时长
55 days
期刊最新文献
Prognostic value of β1 adrenergic receptor autoantibodies for microvascular obstruction in patients with STEMI with Post-PCI: A prospective cohort study Autoimmune diseases and cardiovascular risk: Mendelian randomization analysis for the impact of 19 autoimmune diseases on 14 cardiovascular conditions The interplay between epidermal barrier distribution, microbiota composition, and immune infiltrate defines and stratifies psoriasis patients and is associated with disease severity Homeostatic signals, including IL-7 and self-MHC recognition, induce the development of peripheral helper T cells, which are enriched in the joints of rheumatoid arthritis C3 glomerulopathy is highly prevalent in French Polynesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1