调查爱尔兰放射技师目前对患者与医生沟通的看法

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jmir.2024.101442
Sonya Quirke , Cláudia Sá dos Reis , Mark McEntee , Ms Niamh Moore , Andrew England
{"title":"调查爱尔兰放射技师目前对患者与医生沟通的看法","authors":"Sonya Quirke ,&nbsp;Cláudia Sá dos Reis ,&nbsp;Mark McEntee ,&nbsp;Ms Niamh Moore ,&nbsp;Andrew England","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2024.101442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Many of the tasks performed by radiographers rely on effective communication with patients. This study aims to evaluate radiographers' experiences communicating with patients to determine what communication skills they believe they have, challenges they encounter and any familiarity with communication tools. It also assesses their willingness to accept further training and utilise recognised scripted communication tools, such as AIDET (Acknowledge, Introduce, Duration, Explanation and Thank you).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data were collected using an online survey deployed using the MS Forms platform. The survey consisted of 42 questions: 12 qualitative ‘open-ended’ questions and 30 ‘close-ended’ quantitative questions. The survey remained open between March and May 2022. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative responses using thematic content analysis. Cross distribution analysis, basic percentages, and graphic bar charts were used for quantitative data analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>One hundred and nine radiographers completed the questionnaire. Quantitative analysis found that 84 % (<em>n</em> = 87) of radiographers had not received additional post-qualification training in patient communication. Five communication themes emerged from the thematic analysis; (1) Expectations, (2) Education, (3) Improvements, (4) Errors, and (5) Communication Tools. The scripted communication tool AIDET, according to 86 % (<em>n</em> = 89) of respondents, was perceived to be potential helpful in improving radiographer-patient interactions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Radiographers do not believe they have received adequate training for communicating with patients and would like to receive additional training and education. AIDET could be a useful communication tool as a starting guide for less experienced radiographers. There is a need for further studies that explore the use and effectiveness of scripted communication tools in radiographers’ communications skills. In addition, additional post-registration training opportunities need to be available for radiographers in patient communication.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An investigation into the current perceptions of Irish Radiographers regarding patient-practitioner communication\",\"authors\":\"Sonya Quirke ,&nbsp;Cláudia Sá dos Reis ,&nbsp;Mark McEntee ,&nbsp;Ms Niamh Moore ,&nbsp;Andrew England\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmir.2024.101442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Many of the tasks performed by radiographers rely on effective communication with patients. This study aims to evaluate radiographers' experiences communicating with patients to determine what communication skills they believe they have, challenges they encounter and any familiarity with communication tools. It also assesses their willingness to accept further training and utilise recognised scripted communication tools, such as AIDET (Acknowledge, Introduce, Duration, Explanation and Thank you).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data were collected using an online survey deployed using the MS Forms platform. The survey consisted of 42 questions: 12 qualitative ‘open-ended’ questions and 30 ‘close-ended’ quantitative questions. The survey remained open between March and May 2022. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative responses using thematic content analysis. Cross distribution analysis, basic percentages, and graphic bar charts were used for quantitative data analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>One hundred and nine radiographers completed the questionnaire. Quantitative analysis found that 84 % (<em>n</em> = 87) of radiographers had not received additional post-qualification training in patient communication. Five communication themes emerged from the thematic analysis; (1) Expectations, (2) Education, (3) Improvements, (4) Errors, and (5) Communication Tools. The scripted communication tool AIDET, according to 86 % (<em>n</em> = 89) of respondents, was perceived to be potential helpful in improving radiographer-patient interactions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Radiographers do not believe they have received adequate training for communicating with patients and would like to receive additional training and education. AIDET could be a useful communication tool as a starting guide for less experienced radiographers. There is a need for further studies that explore the use and effectiveness of scripted communication tools in radiographers’ communications skills. In addition, additional post-registration training opportunities need to be available for radiographers in patient communication.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939865424001681\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939865424001681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:放射技师的许多工作都依赖于与患者的有效沟通。本研究旨在评估放射技师与患者沟通的经验,以确定他们认为自己掌握了哪些沟通技巧、遇到了哪些挑战以及是否熟悉沟通工具。本研究还评估了他们接受进一步培训和使用公认的脚本沟通工具(如 AIDET(确认、介绍、持续时间、解释和感谢))的意愿。调查包括 42 个问题:调查包括 42 个问题:12 个 "开放式 "定性问题和 30 个 "封闭式 "定量问题。调查在 2022 年 3 月至 5 月期间持续开放。定量数据采用描述性统计进行分析,定性回答采用主题内容分析进行分析。定量数据分析使用了交叉分布分析、基本百分比和柱形图。定量分析发现,84%(n = 87)的放射技师在取得资格后没有接受过额外的患者沟通培训。通过主题分析得出了五个沟通主题:(1) 期望、(2) 教育、(3) 改进、(4) 错误和 (5) 沟通工具。86%(n=89)的受访者认为脚本化沟通工具 AIDET 有助于改善放射技师与患者之间的互动。对于经验不足的放射技师来说,AIDET 是一个有用的沟通工具,可以作为起步指南。有必要开展进一步研究,探讨脚本化沟通工具在放射技师沟通技能方面的使用情况和效果。此外,还需要为放射技师提供更多注册后的患者沟通培训机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An investigation into the current perceptions of Irish Radiographers regarding patient-practitioner communication

Introduction

Many of the tasks performed by radiographers rely on effective communication with patients. This study aims to evaluate radiographers' experiences communicating with patients to determine what communication skills they believe they have, challenges they encounter and any familiarity with communication tools. It also assesses their willingness to accept further training and utilise recognised scripted communication tools, such as AIDET (Acknowledge, Introduce, Duration, Explanation and Thank you).

Methods

Data were collected using an online survey deployed using the MS Forms platform. The survey consisted of 42 questions: 12 qualitative ‘open-ended’ questions and 30 ‘close-ended’ quantitative questions. The survey remained open between March and May 2022. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative responses using thematic content analysis. Cross distribution analysis, basic percentages, and graphic bar charts were used for quantitative data analysis.

Results

One hundred and nine radiographers completed the questionnaire. Quantitative analysis found that 84 % (n = 87) of radiographers had not received additional post-qualification training in patient communication. Five communication themes emerged from the thematic analysis; (1) Expectations, (2) Education, (3) Improvements, (4) Errors, and (5) Communication Tools. The scripted communication tool AIDET, according to 86 % (n = 89) of respondents, was perceived to be potential helpful in improving radiographer-patient interactions.

Conclusion

Radiographers do not believe they have received adequate training for communicating with patients and would like to receive additional training and education. AIDET could be a useful communication tool as a starting guide for less experienced radiographers. There is a need for further studies that explore the use and effectiveness of scripted communication tools in radiographers’ communications skills. In addition, additional post-registration training opportunities need to be available for radiographers in patient communication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
231
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists. This journal is published four times a year and is circulated to approximately 11,000 medical radiation technologists, libraries and radiology departments throughout Canada, the United States and overseas. The Journal publishes articles on recent research, new technology and techniques, professional practices, technologists viewpoints as well as relevant book reviews.
期刊最新文献
A bibliometric analysis on research authorship and collaboration patterns in radiography professional journals: A 10-year review The design and construct a website for collection and report diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in diagnostic radiography Beyond the Machine: A Radiographer's Tale Innovative Learning Activities to Prepare Radiography Students for Final-Year Clinical Placements: An Educational Perspective Enhancing radiation therapy student's cultural competency and safety of Canadian Indigenous populations using cultural immersion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1