后 ChatGPT 时代的兴奋与担忧:通过社交媒体分析解读公众对人工智能的看法

IF 7.6 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Telematics and Informatics Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1016/j.tele.2024.102158
Weihong Qi , Jinsheng Pan , Hanjia Lyu , Jiebo Luo
{"title":"后 ChatGPT 时代的兴奋与担忧:通过社交媒体分析解读公众对人工智能的看法","authors":"Weihong Qi ,&nbsp;Jinsheng Pan ,&nbsp;Hanjia Lyu ,&nbsp;Jiebo Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.tele.2024.102158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As AI systems become increasingly prevalent in various aspects of daily life, gaining a comprehensive understanding of public perception towards these AI systems has become increasingly essential for several reasons such as ethical considerations, user experience, fear, disinformation, regulation, collaboration, and co-creation. In this study, we investigate how mass social media users perceive the recent rise of AI frameworks such as ChatGPT. We collect a total of 33,912 comments in 388 unique subreddits spanning from November 30, 2022 to June 8, 2023 using a list of AI-related keywords. We employ a combination of thematic and sentiment analysis, using advanced natural language processing techniques. Specifically, we use BERTopic to uncover the major themes regarding AI on Reddit. Our findings indicate that technology-focused subreddits primarily discuss the technical dimensions of AI, while non-technical subreddits more often address societal impacts, such as job displacement concerns. The disparity in focus between subreddits suggests a gap in the public understanding of AI. We leverage GPT-3.5 with zero-shot prompting and LIWC to analyze the sentiment and perception of AI among individual users. Through a comprehensive sentiment and emotion analysis, we discover that tech-centric communities exhibit greater polarization compared to non-tech communities when discussing AI topics. This suggests that individuals with a deeper understanding or familiarity with AI technologies might have more divided opinions, possibly reflecting a mix of optimism about technological advancements and skepticism about potential impacts. This research contributes to our broader understanding of public opinion surrounding artificial intelligence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48257,"journal":{"name":"Telematics and Informatics","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 102158"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Excitements and concerns in the post-ChatGPT era: Deciphering public perception of AI through social media analysis\",\"authors\":\"Weihong Qi ,&nbsp;Jinsheng Pan ,&nbsp;Hanjia Lyu ,&nbsp;Jiebo Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tele.2024.102158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>As AI systems become increasingly prevalent in various aspects of daily life, gaining a comprehensive understanding of public perception towards these AI systems has become increasingly essential for several reasons such as ethical considerations, user experience, fear, disinformation, regulation, collaboration, and co-creation. In this study, we investigate how mass social media users perceive the recent rise of AI frameworks such as ChatGPT. We collect a total of 33,912 comments in 388 unique subreddits spanning from November 30, 2022 to June 8, 2023 using a list of AI-related keywords. We employ a combination of thematic and sentiment analysis, using advanced natural language processing techniques. Specifically, we use BERTopic to uncover the major themes regarding AI on Reddit. Our findings indicate that technology-focused subreddits primarily discuss the technical dimensions of AI, while non-technical subreddits more often address societal impacts, such as job displacement concerns. The disparity in focus between subreddits suggests a gap in the public understanding of AI. We leverage GPT-3.5 with zero-shot prompting and LIWC to analyze the sentiment and perception of AI among individual users. Through a comprehensive sentiment and emotion analysis, we discover that tech-centric communities exhibit greater polarization compared to non-tech communities when discussing AI topics. This suggests that individuals with a deeper understanding or familiarity with AI technologies might have more divided opinions, possibly reflecting a mix of optimism about technological advancements and skepticism about potential impacts. This research contributes to our broader understanding of public opinion surrounding artificial intelligence.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telematics and Informatics\",\"volume\":\"92 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telematics and Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585324000625\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telematics and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585324000625","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着人工智能系统在日常生活的各个方面日益普及,出于道德考虑、用户体验、恐惧、虚假信息、监管、协作和共同创造等原因,全面了解公众对这些人工智能系统的看法变得越来越重要。在本研究中,我们调查了大众社交媒体用户如何看待最近兴起的人工智能框架(如 ChatGPT)。我们使用人工智能相关关键词列表,收集了从 2022 年 11 月 30 日到 2023 年 6 月 8 日期间 388 个独特的 subreddits 中的 33912 条评论。我们采用先进的自然语言处理技术,将主题分析和情感分析相结合。具体来说,我们使用 BERTopic 来揭示 Reddit 上有关人工智能的主要主题。我们的研究结果表明,以技术为重点的子版块主要讨论人工智能的技术层面,而非技术性的子版块则更多地讨论社会影响,例如对失业的担忧。各子版块关注点的差异表明公众对人工智能的理解存在差距。我们利用 GPT-3.5 的零点提示和 LIWC 来分析单个用户对人工智能的情感和认知。通过全面的情感和情绪分析,我们发现与非科技社区相比,以科技为中心的社区在讨论人工智能话题时表现出更大的两极分化。这表明,对人工智能技术有更深入了解或更熟悉的个人可能会有更多不同意见,这可能反映了对技术进步的乐观和对潜在影响的怀疑。这项研究有助于我们更广泛地了解公众对人工智能的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Excitements and concerns in the post-ChatGPT era: Deciphering public perception of AI through social media analysis

As AI systems become increasingly prevalent in various aspects of daily life, gaining a comprehensive understanding of public perception towards these AI systems has become increasingly essential for several reasons such as ethical considerations, user experience, fear, disinformation, regulation, collaboration, and co-creation. In this study, we investigate how mass social media users perceive the recent rise of AI frameworks such as ChatGPT. We collect a total of 33,912 comments in 388 unique subreddits spanning from November 30, 2022 to June 8, 2023 using a list of AI-related keywords. We employ a combination of thematic and sentiment analysis, using advanced natural language processing techniques. Specifically, we use BERTopic to uncover the major themes regarding AI on Reddit. Our findings indicate that technology-focused subreddits primarily discuss the technical dimensions of AI, while non-technical subreddits more often address societal impacts, such as job displacement concerns. The disparity in focus between subreddits suggests a gap in the public understanding of AI. We leverage GPT-3.5 with zero-shot prompting and LIWC to analyze the sentiment and perception of AI among individual users. Through a comprehensive sentiment and emotion analysis, we discover that tech-centric communities exhibit greater polarization compared to non-tech communities when discussing AI topics. This suggests that individuals with a deeper understanding or familiarity with AI technologies might have more divided opinions, possibly reflecting a mix of optimism about technological advancements and skepticism about potential impacts. This research contributes to our broader understanding of public opinion surrounding artificial intelligence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Telematics and Informatics
Telematics and Informatics INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Telematics and Informatics is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes cutting-edge theoretical and methodological research exploring the social, economic, geographic, political, and cultural impacts of digital technologies. It covers various application areas, such as smart cities, sensors, information fusion, digital society, IoT, cyber-physical technologies, privacy, knowledge management, distributed work, emergency response, mobile communications, health informatics, social media's psychosocial effects, ICT for sustainable development, blockchain, e-commerce, and e-government.
期刊最新文献
Towards harmonization of EU and UN methodologies for the assessment of eGovernment How to fight loneliness: The importance of networked friendship quality and self-esteem differs with age Overcoming social and ethical challenges of AI through organizational resilience. A PLS-SEM approach Understanding online shopping fraud among Chinese elderly: Extending routine activity theory in the online context Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1