早期同步引入心力衰竭四大支柱疗法的策略:单个中心的经验结果。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs Pub Date : 2024-06-23 DOI:10.1007/s40256-024-00660-6
Paolo Severino, Andrea D’Amato, Silvia Prosperi, Marco Valerio Mariani, Vincenzo Myftari, Aurora Labbro Francia, Claudia Cestiè, Elisa Tomarelli, Giovanna Manzi, Lucia Ilaria Birtolo, Stefanie Marek-Iannucci, Viviana Maestrini, Massimo Mancone, Roberto Badagliacca, Francesco Fedele, Carmine Dario Vizza
{"title":"早期同步引入心力衰竭四大支柱疗法的策略:单个中心的经验结果。","authors":"Paolo Severino,&nbsp;Andrea D’Amato,&nbsp;Silvia Prosperi,&nbsp;Marco Valerio Mariani,&nbsp;Vincenzo Myftari,&nbsp;Aurora Labbro Francia,&nbsp;Claudia Cestiè,&nbsp;Elisa Tomarelli,&nbsp;Giovanna Manzi,&nbsp;Lucia Ilaria Birtolo,&nbsp;Stefanie Marek-Iannucci,&nbsp;Viviana Maestrini,&nbsp;Massimo Mancone,&nbsp;Roberto Badagliacca,&nbsp;Francesco Fedele,&nbsp;Carmine Dario Vizza","doi":"10.1007/s40256-024-00660-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The 2021 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines recommend the use of four different classes of drugs for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF): beta blockers (BB), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs). Moreover, the 2023 ESC updated Guidelines suggest an intensive strategy of initiation and rapid up-titration of evidence-based treatment before discharge, based on trials not using the four-pillars. We hypothesized that an early concomitantly administration and up-titration of four-pillars, compared with a conventional stepwise approach, may impact the vulnerable phase after hospitalization owing to HF.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This prospective, single center, observational study included consecutive in-hospital patients with HFrEF. After performing propensity score matching, they were divided according to treatment strategy into group 1 (G1), with predischarge start of all four-pillars, with their up-titration within 1 month, and group 2 (G2) with the pre Guidelines update stepwise four-pillars introduction. HF hospitalization, cardiovascular (CV) death, and the composite of both were evaluated between the two groups at 6-month follow-up.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The study included a total of 278 patients who completed 6-month follow-up (139 for both groups). There were no differences in terms of baseline features between the two groups. At survival analysis, HF hospitalization risk was significantly lower in G1 compared with G2 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), while no significant differences were observed regarding CV death (<i>p</i> = 0.642) or the composite of CV death and HF hospitalization (<i>p</i> = 0.135).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In our real-world population, patients with HF treated with a predischarge and simultaneous use of four-pillars showed a reduced risk of HF hospitalization during the vulnerable phase after discharge, compared with  a conventional stepwise approach. </p></div>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":"24 5","pages":"663 - 671"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11344711/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategy for an early simultaneous introduction of four-pillars of heart failure therapy: results from a single center experience\",\"authors\":\"Paolo Severino,&nbsp;Andrea D’Amato,&nbsp;Silvia Prosperi,&nbsp;Marco Valerio Mariani,&nbsp;Vincenzo Myftari,&nbsp;Aurora Labbro Francia,&nbsp;Claudia Cestiè,&nbsp;Elisa Tomarelli,&nbsp;Giovanna Manzi,&nbsp;Lucia Ilaria Birtolo,&nbsp;Stefanie Marek-Iannucci,&nbsp;Viviana Maestrini,&nbsp;Massimo Mancone,&nbsp;Roberto Badagliacca,&nbsp;Francesco Fedele,&nbsp;Carmine Dario Vizza\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40256-024-00660-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The 2021 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines recommend the use of four different classes of drugs for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF): beta blockers (BB), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs). Moreover, the 2023 ESC updated Guidelines suggest an intensive strategy of initiation and rapid up-titration of evidence-based treatment before discharge, based on trials not using the four-pillars. We hypothesized that an early concomitantly administration and up-titration of four-pillars, compared with a conventional stepwise approach, may impact the vulnerable phase after hospitalization owing to HF.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This prospective, single center, observational study included consecutive in-hospital patients with HFrEF. After performing propensity score matching, they were divided according to treatment strategy into group 1 (G1), with predischarge start of all four-pillars, with their up-titration within 1 month, and group 2 (G2) with the pre Guidelines update stepwise four-pillars introduction. HF hospitalization, cardiovascular (CV) death, and the composite of both were evaluated between the two groups at 6-month follow-up.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The study included a total of 278 patients who completed 6-month follow-up (139 for both groups). There were no differences in terms of baseline features between the two groups. At survival analysis, HF hospitalization risk was significantly lower in G1 compared with G2 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), while no significant differences were observed regarding CV death (<i>p</i> = 0.642) or the composite of CV death and HF hospitalization (<i>p</i> = 0.135).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In our real-world population, patients with HF treated with a predischarge and simultaneous use of four-pillars showed a reduced risk of HF hospitalization during the vulnerable phase after discharge, compared with  a conventional stepwise approach. </p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs\",\"volume\":\"24 5\",\"pages\":\"663 - 671\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11344711/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40256-024-00660-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40256-024-00660-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:2021 年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)指南建议使用四种不同类别的药物治疗射血分数降低型心力衰竭(HFrEF):β 受体阻滞剂(BB)、钠-葡萄糖共转运体-2 抑制剂(SGLT2i)、血管紧张素受体/肾素抑制剂(ARNI)和矿物质皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)。此外,2023 年 ESC 更新指南建议在出院前根据未使用四柱疗法的试验,采取强化的循证治疗起始和快速升级策略。我们假设,与传统的分步法相比,早期同时使用四种药物并进行升级治疗,可能会影响因高血压住院后的脆弱期:这项前瞻性、单中心、观察性研究纳入了连续住院的 HFrEF 患者。在进行倾向评分匹配后,根据治疗策略将他们分为第一组(G1)和第二组(G2),第一组在出院前开始使用所有四种药物,并在一个月内进行加量治疗,第二组在指南更新前逐步引入四种药物。在 6 个月的随访中,对两组患者的高血压住院率、心血管(CV)死亡以及两者的复合死亡率进行了评估:研究共纳入了 278 名完成 6 个月随访的患者(两组均为 139 人)。两组患者的基线特征没有差异。在生存分析中,G1 组的心房颤动住院风险明显低于 G2 组(p < 0.001),而在心房颤动死亡(p = 0.642)或心房颤动死亡和心房颤动住院的复合风险(p = 0.135)方面没有观察到显著差异:结论:在我们的实际人群中,与传统的分步法相比,出院前同时使用四柱疗法治疗的心房颤动患者在出院后的脆弱期心房颤动住院风险更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Strategy for an early simultaneous introduction of four-pillars of heart failure therapy: results from a single center experience

Introduction

The 2021 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines recommend the use of four different classes of drugs for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF): beta blockers (BB), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs). Moreover, the 2023 ESC updated Guidelines suggest an intensive strategy of initiation and rapid up-titration of evidence-based treatment before discharge, based on trials not using the four-pillars. We hypothesized that an early concomitantly administration and up-titration of four-pillars, compared with a conventional stepwise approach, may impact the vulnerable phase after hospitalization owing to HF.

Methods

This prospective, single center, observational study included consecutive in-hospital patients with HFrEF. After performing propensity score matching, they were divided according to treatment strategy into group 1 (G1), with predischarge start of all four-pillars, with their up-titration within 1 month, and group 2 (G2) with the pre Guidelines update stepwise four-pillars introduction. HF hospitalization, cardiovascular (CV) death, and the composite of both were evaluated between the two groups at 6-month follow-up.

Results

The study included a total of 278 patients who completed 6-month follow-up (139 for both groups). There were no differences in terms of baseline features between the two groups. At survival analysis, HF hospitalization risk was significantly lower in G1 compared with G2 (p < 0.001), while no significant differences were observed regarding CV death (p = 0.642) or the composite of CV death and HF hospitalization (p = 0.135).

Conclusions

In our real-world population, patients with HF treated with a predischarge and simultaneous use of four-pillars showed a reduced risk of HF hospitalization during the vulnerable phase after discharge, compared with  a conventional stepwise approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting rational therapy within the discipline of cardiology, the American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs covers all aspects of the treatment of cardiovascular disorders, particularly the place in therapy of newer and established agents. Via a program of reviews and original clinical research articles, the journal addresses major issues relating to treatment of these disorders, including the pharmacology, efficacy and adverse effects of the major classes of drugs; information on newly developed drugs and drug classes; the therapeutic implications of latest research into the aetiology of cardiovascular disorders; and the practical management of specific clinical situations. The American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.
期刊最新文献
Cost Effectiveness of Catheter Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction between Cilostazol and Rosuvastatin in Healthy Participants. Use of Direct Anticoagulants in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Review of the Current Evidence and Emerging Perspectives. Impact of Antibacterials on the Quality of Anticoagulation Control in Patients Initiating Warfarin Therapy. Sacubitril-Valsartan Lowers Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence and Left Atrial Volume Post-catheter Ablation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1