在生物疗法时代,家族性炎症性肠病对使用免疫抑制剂、生物制剂和手术的影响。ENEIDA 项目的成果。

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Postgraduate Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1093/postmj/qgae076
Carlos González-Muñoza, Margalida Calafat, Javier P Gisbert, Eva Iglesias, Miguel Mínguez, Beatriz Sicilia, Montserrat Aceituno, Fernando Gomollón, Xavier Calvet, Elena Ricart, Luisa De Castro, Montserrat Rivero, Francisco Mesonero, Lucía Márquez, Pilar Nos, Ainhoa Rodríguez-Pescador, Jordi Guardiola, MarianaFe García-Sepulcre, Santiago García-López, Rufo H Lorente-Poyatos, Cristina Alba, Ramon Sánchez-Ocaña, Isabel Vera, Lucía Madero, Sabino Riestra, Mercedes Navarro-Llavat, Jose L Pérez-Calle, Blau Camps, Manuel Van Domselaar, Alfredo J Lucendo, Maria Dolores Martín-Arranz, Miguel A Montoro-Huguet, Mónica Sierra-Ausín, Jordina Llaó, Daniel Carpio, Pilar Varela, Olga Merino, Luis I Fernández-Salazar, Marta Piqueras, Eva Sesé, David Busquets, Carlos Tardillo, Nuria Maroto, Joan Riera, Carlos Martínez-Flores, Fernando Muñoz, Jordi Gordillo-Ábalos, Federico Bertoletti, Esther Garcia-Planella, Eugeni Domènech
{"title":"在生物疗法时代,家族性炎症性肠病对使用免疫抑制剂、生物制剂和手术的影响。ENEIDA 项目的成果。","authors":"Carlos González-Muñoza, Margalida Calafat, Javier P Gisbert, Eva Iglesias, Miguel Mínguez, Beatriz Sicilia, Montserrat Aceituno, Fernando Gomollón, Xavier Calvet, Elena Ricart, Luisa De Castro, Montserrat Rivero, Francisco Mesonero, Lucía Márquez, Pilar Nos, Ainhoa Rodríguez-Pescador, Jordi Guardiola, MarianaFe García-Sepulcre, Santiago García-López, Rufo H Lorente-Poyatos, Cristina Alba, Ramon Sánchez-Ocaña, Isabel Vera, Lucía Madero, Sabino Riestra, Mercedes Navarro-Llavat, Jose L Pérez-Calle, Blau Camps, Manuel Van Domselaar, Alfredo J Lucendo, Maria Dolores Martín-Arranz, Miguel A Montoro-Huguet, Mónica Sierra-Ausín, Jordina Llaó, Daniel Carpio, Pilar Varela, Olga Merino, Luis I Fernández-Salazar, Marta Piqueras, Eva Sesé, David Busquets, Carlos Tardillo, Nuria Maroto, Joan Riera, Carlos Martínez-Flores, Fernando Muñoz, Jordi Gordillo-Ábalos, Federico Bertoletti, Esther Garcia-Planella, Eugeni Domènech","doi":"10.1093/postmj/qgae076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Familial inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) history is a controversial prognostic factor in IBD. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a familial history of IBD on the use of medical and surgical treatments in the biological era.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients included in the prospectively maintained ENEIDA database and diagnosed with IBD after 2005 were included. Familial forms were defined as those cases with at least one first-degree relative diagnosed with IBD. Disease phenotype, the use of biological agents, or surgical treatments were the main outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5263 patients [2627 Crohn's disease (CD); 2636 ulcerative colitis (UC)] were included, with a median follow-up of 31 months. Of these, 507 (10%) corresponded to familial forms. No clinical differences were observed between familial and sporadic IBD forms except a lower age at IBD diagnosis and a higher rate of males in familial forms of UC. In CD, the proportions of patients treated with thiopurines (54.4% vs 46.7%; P = .015) and survival time free of thiopurines (P = .009) were lower in familial forms. No differences were found regarding the use of biological agents. Concerning surgery, a higher rate of intestinal resections was observed in sporadic CD (14.8% vs 9.9%, P = .027). No differences were observed in UC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the era of biological therapies, familial and sporadic forms of IBD show similar phenotypes and are managed medically in a similar way; whether these is due to lack of phenotypical differences or an effect of biological therapies is uncertain. What is already known on this topic: IBD's etiopathogenesis points to an interaction between environmental and genetic factors, being familial history a controversial prognostic factor. Biological agents use and need for surgery regarding familial or sporadic forms of IBDs present conflicting results. What this study adds: Familial and sporadic forms of IBD have similar phenotypes and are managed medically and surgically in a similar way. How this study might affect research, practice or policy: Familial aggregation should not be considered a factor associated with more aggressive disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":20374,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of familial forms of inflammatory bowel disease on the use of immunosuppressants, biological agents, and surgery in the era of biological therapies. Results from the ENEIDA project.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos González-Muñoza, Margalida Calafat, Javier P Gisbert, Eva Iglesias, Miguel Mínguez, Beatriz Sicilia, Montserrat Aceituno, Fernando Gomollón, Xavier Calvet, Elena Ricart, Luisa De Castro, Montserrat Rivero, Francisco Mesonero, Lucía Márquez, Pilar Nos, Ainhoa Rodríguez-Pescador, Jordi Guardiola, MarianaFe García-Sepulcre, Santiago García-López, Rufo H Lorente-Poyatos, Cristina Alba, Ramon Sánchez-Ocaña, Isabel Vera, Lucía Madero, Sabino Riestra, Mercedes Navarro-Llavat, Jose L Pérez-Calle, Blau Camps, Manuel Van Domselaar, Alfredo J Lucendo, Maria Dolores Martín-Arranz, Miguel A Montoro-Huguet, Mónica Sierra-Ausín, Jordina Llaó, Daniel Carpio, Pilar Varela, Olga Merino, Luis I Fernández-Salazar, Marta Piqueras, Eva Sesé, David Busquets, Carlos Tardillo, Nuria Maroto, Joan Riera, Carlos Martínez-Flores, Fernando Muñoz, Jordi Gordillo-Ábalos, Federico Bertoletti, Esther Garcia-Planella, Eugeni Domènech\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/postmj/qgae076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Familial inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) history is a controversial prognostic factor in IBD. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a familial history of IBD on the use of medical and surgical treatments in the biological era.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients included in the prospectively maintained ENEIDA database and diagnosed with IBD after 2005 were included. Familial forms were defined as those cases with at least one first-degree relative diagnosed with IBD. Disease phenotype, the use of biological agents, or surgical treatments were the main outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5263 patients [2627 Crohn's disease (CD); 2636 ulcerative colitis (UC)] were included, with a median follow-up of 31 months. Of these, 507 (10%) corresponded to familial forms. No clinical differences were observed between familial and sporadic IBD forms except a lower age at IBD diagnosis and a higher rate of males in familial forms of UC. In CD, the proportions of patients treated with thiopurines (54.4% vs 46.7%; P = .015) and survival time free of thiopurines (P = .009) were lower in familial forms. No differences were found regarding the use of biological agents. Concerning surgery, a higher rate of intestinal resections was observed in sporadic CD (14.8% vs 9.9%, P = .027). No differences were observed in UC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the era of biological therapies, familial and sporadic forms of IBD show similar phenotypes and are managed medically in a similar way; whether these is due to lack of phenotypical differences or an effect of biological therapies is uncertain. What is already known on this topic: IBD's etiopathogenesis points to an interaction between environmental and genetic factors, being familial history a controversial prognostic factor. Biological agents use and need for surgery regarding familial or sporadic forms of IBDs present conflicting results. What this study adds: Familial and sporadic forms of IBD have similar phenotypes and are managed medically and surgically in a similar way. How this study might affect research, practice or policy: Familial aggregation should not be considered a factor associated with more aggressive disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postgraduate Medical Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postgraduate Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgae076\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgae076","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:家族性炎症性肠病(IBD)病史是一个有争议的IBD预后因素。我们旨在评估家族性 IBD 病史对生物时代内外科治疗的影响:方法:纳入前瞻性维护的 ENEIDA 数据库中 2005 年后确诊为 IBD 的患者。家族性病例是指至少有一名一级亲属被诊断患有 IBD 的病例。疾病表型、生物制剂的使用或手术治疗是主要结果:共纳入 5263 名患者[2627 名克罗恩病(CD)患者;2636 名溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者],中位随访时间为 31 个月。其中 507 例(10%)为家族性。除了家族性溃疡性结肠炎患者确诊 IBD 的年龄较低和男性比例较高外,未观察到家族性 IBD 与散发性 IBD 在临床上有任何差异。在 CD 中,使用硫嘌呤类药物治疗的患者比例(54.4% vs 46.7%;P = .015)和不使用硫嘌呤类药物的存活时间(P = .009)在家族性 IBD 中较低。在使用生物制剂方面没有发现差异。在手术方面,散发性 CD 的肠切除率更高(14.8% vs 9.9%,P = .027)。在 UC 中未观察到差异:结论:在生物疗法时代,家族性和散发性 IBD 表现出相似的表型,药物治疗的方式也相似;至于这是由于缺乏表型差异还是生物疗法的影响,目前尚不确定。关于这一主题的已知信息:IBD 的发病机理是环境因素和遗传因素之间的相互作用,家族史是一个有争议的预后因素。关于家族性或散发性 IBD,生物制剂的使用和手术治疗的需求呈现出相互矛盾的结果。本研究的补充:家族性和散发性 IBD 具有相似的表型,药物治疗和手术治疗的方式也相似。本研究对研究、实践或政策有何影响?不应将家族聚集性视为与更具侵袭性疾病相关的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of familial forms of inflammatory bowel disease on the use of immunosuppressants, biological agents, and surgery in the era of biological therapies. Results from the ENEIDA project.

Background and aims: Familial inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) history is a controversial prognostic factor in IBD. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a familial history of IBD on the use of medical and surgical treatments in the biological era.

Methods: Patients included in the prospectively maintained ENEIDA database and diagnosed with IBD after 2005 were included. Familial forms were defined as those cases with at least one first-degree relative diagnosed with IBD. Disease phenotype, the use of biological agents, or surgical treatments were the main outcomes.

Results: A total of 5263 patients [2627 Crohn's disease (CD); 2636 ulcerative colitis (UC)] were included, with a median follow-up of 31 months. Of these, 507 (10%) corresponded to familial forms. No clinical differences were observed between familial and sporadic IBD forms except a lower age at IBD diagnosis and a higher rate of males in familial forms of UC. In CD, the proportions of patients treated with thiopurines (54.4% vs 46.7%; P = .015) and survival time free of thiopurines (P = .009) were lower in familial forms. No differences were found regarding the use of biological agents. Concerning surgery, a higher rate of intestinal resections was observed in sporadic CD (14.8% vs 9.9%, P = .027). No differences were observed in UC.

Conclusions: In the era of biological therapies, familial and sporadic forms of IBD show similar phenotypes and are managed medically in a similar way; whether these is due to lack of phenotypical differences or an effect of biological therapies is uncertain. What is already known on this topic: IBD's etiopathogenesis points to an interaction between environmental and genetic factors, being familial history a controversial prognostic factor. Biological agents use and need for surgery regarding familial or sporadic forms of IBDs present conflicting results. What this study adds: Familial and sporadic forms of IBD have similar phenotypes and are managed medically and surgically in a similar way. How this study might affect research, practice or policy: Familial aggregation should not be considered a factor associated with more aggressive disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Postgraduate Medical Journal
Postgraduate Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Postgraduate Medical Journal is a peer reviewed journal published on behalf of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. The journal aims to support junior doctors and their teachers and contribute to the continuing professional development of all doctors by publishing papers on a wide range of topics relevant to the practicing clinician and teacher. Papers published in PMJ include those that focus on core competencies; that describe current practice and new developments in all branches of medicine; that describe relevance and impact of translational research on clinical practice; that provide background relevant to examinations; and papers on medical education and medical education research. PMJ supports CPD by providing the opportunity for doctors to publish many types of articles including original clinical research; reviews; quality improvement reports; editorials, and correspondence on clinical matters.
期刊最新文献
A Mendelian analysis of the causality between inflammatory cytokines and digestive tract cancers. Cholecystectomy and cancer risk: evidence from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and Mendelian randomization. The key to addressing the issue of academic misconduct in the medical field is to reform the evaluation system. Timeliness of reperfusion in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and outcomes in Kerala, India: results of the TRUST outcomes registry. Variation of brain natriuretic peptide assists with volume management and predicts prognosis of hemodialysis patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1