Market Entry Agreements for Innovative Pharmaceuticals Subject to Indication Broadening: A Case Study for Pembrolizumab in The Netherlands

Objectives

Managed entry agreements and especially financial-based agreements are commonly used in European countries for innovative cancer pharmaceuticals. These agreements facilitate access to innovative treatments while mitigating financial risks for payers. This study focuses on the confidential price agreement made by the Dutch government for the reimbursement of pembrolizumab, the implications of broadening indications on cost-effectiveness, and the viability or desirability of said agreement.

Methods

We selected 5 indications in which pembrolizumab was deemed effective and developed portioned survival models for each indication. Survival and progression-free survival data from the published trials were utilized to recreate individual patient data, and we extrapolated—using parametric models—to a time horizon of 30 years. Inputs for both quality of life and costs were derived from the available literature and were indexed.

Results

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranged between €35 313 and €322 349 per quality-adjusted life-year, depending on the indication. Only 1 indication fell under the €80 000 (or €100 000) cost-effectiveness threshold. When applying the average reported discount on intramural pharmaceuticals in The Netherlands, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranged between €20 881 and €252 934 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, and the €80 000 (or €100 000) threshold was met in 3 indications out of 5.

Conclusions

Our results show that pembrolizumab could be cost-effective in some indications, depending on the confidential price agreement established. However, the possibility of reimbursing not cost-effective care when the price is anchored in 1 indication remains possible. Indication-based pricing could help align value and price for innovative pharmaceuticals that are subject to indication broadening.