降低医疗补助绝育等待期长度的影响模型:多站点队列研究。

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Contraception Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110531
{"title":"降低医疗补助绝育等待期长度的影响模型:多站点队列研究。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the impact of length of the Medicaid sterilization waiting period and postpartum permanent contraception fulfillment.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Simulations from a retrospective cohort study estimating the potential increase in permanent contraception within 365 days of delivery.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In our sample of 2076 patients, 61% achieved permanent contraception with the current waiting period of 30 days. With the waiting period hypothetically reduced to 15, 3, 1, and 0 days, 62.9%, 63.7%, 64.5%, and 75% patients, respectively, would have achieved permanent contraception.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>As potential Medicaid sterilization policy revisions are considered, understanding the impact on fulfillment rates is critical.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 110531"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling the impact of decreasing waiting period length for Medicaid sterilization: A multi-site cohort study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the impact of length of the Medicaid sterilization waiting period and postpartum permanent contraception fulfillment.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Simulations from a retrospective cohort study estimating the potential increase in permanent contraception within 365 days of delivery.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In our sample of 2076 patients, 61% achieved permanent contraception with the current waiting period of 30 days. With the waiting period hypothetically reduced to 15, 3, 1, and 0 days, 62.9%, 63.7%, 64.5%, and 75% patients, respectively, would have achieved permanent contraception.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>As potential Medicaid sterilization policy revisions are considered, understanding the impact on fulfillment rates is critical.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception\",\"volume\":\"139 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110531\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782424002191\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782424002191","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的: 评估医疗补助计划绝育等待期的长短对产后永久避孕的影响:评估医疗补助计划绝育等待期的长短对产后永久避孕的影响:研究设计:通过一项回顾性队列研究进行模拟,估算产后 365 天内永久避孕率的潜在增长结果:在我们的 2076 名患者样本中,61% 的患者在当前 30 天的等待期内实现了永久避孕。如果假设将等待期缩短至 15 天、3 天、1 天和 0 天,则分别有 62.9%、63.7%、64.5% 和 75% 的患者可以实现永久避孕:结论:在考虑潜在的医疗补助绝育政策修订时,了解其对完成率的影响至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modeling the impact of decreasing waiting period length for Medicaid sterilization: A multi-site cohort study

Objective

To evaluate the impact of length of the Medicaid sterilization waiting period and postpartum permanent contraception fulfillment.

Study design

Simulations from a retrospective cohort study estimating the potential increase in permanent contraception within 365 days of delivery.

Results

In our sample of 2076 patients, 61% achieved permanent contraception with the current waiting period of 30 days. With the waiting period hypothetically reduced to 15, 3, 1, and 0 days, 62.9%, 63.7%, 64.5%, and 75% patients, respectively, would have achieved permanent contraception.

Conclusions

As potential Medicaid sterilization policy revisions are considered, understanding the impact on fulfillment rates is critical.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception
Contraception 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
211
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.
期刊最新文献
Alignment of contraceptive method attribute preferences and use among Kenyan women living with HIV Consideration of vasectomy among patients desiring postpartum permanent contraception and their obstetrician-gynecologists: A United States-based study Provision of contraceptive prescriptions following medication abortion in Australian general practice: A National Longitudinal Study using MedicineInsight, 2013–2022 Clinical evaluation of a low-cost and high-fidelity animal model for palpable and nonpalpable implant removal Label comprehension study for a proposed over-the-counter progestin-only pill
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1