定义、识别和量化儿童肌张力障碍的临床医生知识、信心和实践模式:一项横断面调查研究。

IF 1.7 Developmental neurorehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1080/17518423.2024.2363182
Amy E Barbuto, Christina Bickley, Alyssa Fiss, Katy Mitchell
{"title":"定义、识别和量化儿童肌张力障碍的临床医生知识、信心和实践模式:一项横断面调查研究。","authors":"Amy E Barbuto, Christina Bickley, Alyssa Fiss, Katy Mitchell","doi":"10.1080/17518423.2024.2363182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A survey was completed by 183 clinicians at a pediatric hospital to investigate knowledge, confidence, and practice patterns defining, identifying, and quantifying dystonia in children. The definition of dystonia was correctly identified by 86% of participants. While 88% reported identifying dystonia, only 42% of physicians and therapists reported quantifying dystonia. A weak, significant correlation, r<sub>s</sub> =.339, <i>p</i> ≤ .001, was found between years of pediatric experience and confidence identifying dystonia. Clinician reported higher confidence levels identifying and quantifying dystonia if they perform a neurological exam. Clinical training initiatives are needed to improve standardization and build confidence in defining, identifying, and quantifying dystonia.</p>","PeriodicalId":93976,"journal":{"name":"Developmental neurorehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"116-125"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinician Knowledge, Confidence, and Practice Patterns Defining, Identifying, and Quantifying Dystonia in Children: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.\",\"authors\":\"Amy E Barbuto, Christina Bickley, Alyssa Fiss, Katy Mitchell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17518423.2024.2363182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A survey was completed by 183 clinicians at a pediatric hospital to investigate knowledge, confidence, and practice patterns defining, identifying, and quantifying dystonia in children. The definition of dystonia was correctly identified by 86% of participants. While 88% reported identifying dystonia, only 42% of physicians and therapists reported quantifying dystonia. A weak, significant correlation, r<sub>s</sub> =.339, <i>p</i> ≤ .001, was found between years of pediatric experience and confidence identifying dystonia. Clinician reported higher confidence levels identifying and quantifying dystonia if they perform a neurological exam. Clinical training initiatives are needed to improve standardization and build confidence in defining, identifying, and quantifying dystonia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental neurorehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"116-125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental neurorehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2024.2363182\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental neurorehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2024.2363182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一家儿科医院的 183 名临床医生完成了一项调查,以了解对儿童肌张力障碍的定义、识别和量化的知识、信心和实践模式。86%的参与者正确识别了肌张力障碍的定义。88%的参与者表示能识别肌张力障碍,但只有42%的医生和治疗师表示能量化肌张力障碍。研究发现,儿科工作经验年限与识别肌张力障碍的信心之间存在微弱的显著相关性(rs =.339,p ≤ .001)。临床医生表示,如果他们进行了神经系统检查,则识别和量化肌张力障碍的信心水平更高。需要开展临床培训活动,以提高标准化程度,并建立对肌张力障碍的定义、识别和量化的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinician Knowledge, Confidence, and Practice Patterns Defining, Identifying, and Quantifying Dystonia in Children: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

A survey was completed by 183 clinicians at a pediatric hospital to investigate knowledge, confidence, and practice patterns defining, identifying, and quantifying dystonia in children. The definition of dystonia was correctly identified by 86% of participants. While 88% reported identifying dystonia, only 42% of physicians and therapists reported quantifying dystonia. A weak, significant correlation, rs =.339, p ≤ .001, was found between years of pediatric experience and confidence identifying dystonia. Clinician reported higher confidence levels identifying and quantifying dystonia if they perform a neurological exam. Clinical training initiatives are needed to improve standardization and build confidence in defining, identifying, and quantifying dystonia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is the community participation and environment of children with Down syndrome different from their typically developing peers? A cross-sectional study. Examination of the relationship between respiratory muscle strength, postural control, functional exercise capacity, and daily living activities in individuals with spastic cerebral palsy: A case-control study. Parental autistic traits and neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with autism spectrum disorder: a family phenotype perspective. Relations between communication and motor skills in young children with Down syndrome: a brief report. The effects of moderate to high intensity badminton exercise on sleep quality in children with autism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1