Rebecca Bull , Laura McFarland , Tamara Cumming , Sandie Wong
{"title":"与工作相关的福利以及工作场所文化和氛围对幼儿教育行业离职意向的影响","authors":"Rebecca Bull , Laura McFarland , Tamara Cumming , Sandie Wong","doi":"10.1016/j.ecresq.2024.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>High-quality early childhood education and care (ECEC) enables families to participate in paid employment and promotes positive outcomes for children. Maintaining a stable ECEC workforce is critical to these endeavours. However, the retention of qualified early childhood educators is a pervasive problem globally. While much has been written about reasons for leaving the sector, there has been less attention to the ‘intention to leave’ stage. This study used a mixed-methods approach to explore how work culture and climate and work-related wellbeing support early childhood professionals’ decisions to stay in or leave the profession, and whether there are significant differences between educators’ and centre directors’ intention to leave. Quantitative findings of survey responses from 713 early childhood professionals suggest that one in three respondents intended to leave the profession, more than half of these within five years. Emotional exhaustion predicted intention to leave in both groups. For centre directors, higher personal accomplishment and older age also predicted higher likelihood of intending to leave. For educators, lower satisfaction with pay and benefits and lower qualification level predicted intention to leave. Qualitative findings highlighted participants’ (n = 97) reasons for intention to leave the sector: feeling undervalued, increased demands with inadequate support, and workforce issues. Understanding these factors may assist in designing interventions to prevent intention turning into a decision to leave, and therefore improve workforce stability. This is especially timely in the Australian context, when attention to supporting the ECEC workforce is high on the political agenda, and real structural and organisational change is possible.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48348,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","volume":"69 ","pages":"Pages 13-24"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200624000942/pdfft?md5=e61e9d1ef4b842df4680b0e436e267c9&pid=1-s2.0-S0885200624000942-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of work-related wellbeing and workplace culture and climate on intention to leave in the early childhood sector\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Bull , Laura McFarland , Tamara Cumming , Sandie Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecresq.2024.06.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>High-quality early childhood education and care (ECEC) enables families to participate in paid employment and promotes positive outcomes for children. Maintaining a stable ECEC workforce is critical to these endeavours. However, the retention of qualified early childhood educators is a pervasive problem globally. While much has been written about reasons for leaving the sector, there has been less attention to the ‘intention to leave’ stage. This study used a mixed-methods approach to explore how work culture and climate and work-related wellbeing support early childhood professionals’ decisions to stay in or leave the profession, and whether there are significant differences between educators’ and centre directors’ intention to leave. Quantitative findings of survey responses from 713 early childhood professionals suggest that one in three respondents intended to leave the profession, more than half of these within five years. Emotional exhaustion predicted intention to leave in both groups. For centre directors, higher personal accomplishment and older age also predicted higher likelihood of intending to leave. For educators, lower satisfaction with pay and benefits and lower qualification level predicted intention to leave. Qualitative findings highlighted participants’ (n = 97) reasons for intention to leave the sector: feeling undervalued, increased demands with inadequate support, and workforce issues. Understanding these factors may assist in designing interventions to prevent intention turning into a decision to leave, and therefore improve workforce stability. This is especially timely in the Australian context, when attention to supporting the ECEC workforce is high on the political agenda, and real structural and organisational change is possible.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Childhood Research Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"69 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 13-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200624000942/pdfft?md5=e61e9d1ef4b842df4680b0e436e267c9&pid=1-s2.0-S0885200624000942-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Childhood Research Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200624000942\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200624000942","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
The impact of work-related wellbeing and workplace culture and climate on intention to leave in the early childhood sector
High-quality early childhood education and care (ECEC) enables families to participate in paid employment and promotes positive outcomes for children. Maintaining a stable ECEC workforce is critical to these endeavours. However, the retention of qualified early childhood educators is a pervasive problem globally. While much has been written about reasons for leaving the sector, there has been less attention to the ‘intention to leave’ stage. This study used a mixed-methods approach to explore how work culture and climate and work-related wellbeing support early childhood professionals’ decisions to stay in or leave the profession, and whether there are significant differences between educators’ and centre directors’ intention to leave. Quantitative findings of survey responses from 713 early childhood professionals suggest that one in three respondents intended to leave the profession, more than half of these within five years. Emotional exhaustion predicted intention to leave in both groups. For centre directors, higher personal accomplishment and older age also predicted higher likelihood of intending to leave. For educators, lower satisfaction with pay and benefits and lower qualification level predicted intention to leave. Qualitative findings highlighted participants’ (n = 97) reasons for intention to leave the sector: feeling undervalued, increased demands with inadequate support, and workforce issues. Understanding these factors may assist in designing interventions to prevent intention turning into a decision to leave, and therefore improve workforce stability. This is especially timely in the Australian context, when attention to supporting the ECEC workforce is high on the political agenda, and real structural and organisational change is possible.
期刊介绍:
For over twenty years, Early Childhood Research Quarterly (ECRQ) has influenced the field of early childhood education and development through the publication of empirical research that meets the highest standards of scholarly and practical significance. ECRQ publishes predominantly empirical research (quantitative or qualitative methods) on issues of interest to early childhood development, theory, and educational practice (Birth through 8 years of age). The journal also occasionally publishes practitioner and/or policy perspectives, book reviews, and significant reviews of research. As an applied journal, we are interested in work that has social, policy, and educational relevance and implications and work that strengthens links between research and practice.