参与终末期肾病治疗的日本医疗保健专业人员在肾脏保守治疗方面遇到的障碍。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Clinical and Experimental Nephrology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1007/s10157-024-02529-z
Yumi Sota, Takuya Fujimaru, Kyoko Kobayashi, Kevin Y Urayama, Nozomi Kadota, Kasumi Konishi, Yugo Ito, Masahiko Nagahama, Fumika Taki, Michiko Suzuki, Masaaki Nakayama
{"title":"参与终末期肾病治疗的日本医疗保健专业人员在肾脏保守治疗方面遇到的障碍。","authors":"Yumi Sota, Takuya Fujimaru, Kyoko Kobayashi, Kevin Y Urayama, Nozomi Kadota, Kasumi Konishi, Yugo Ito, Masahiko Nagahama, Fumika Taki, Michiko Suzuki, Masaaki Nakayama","doi":"10.1007/s10157-024-02529-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conservative kidney management (CKM) is a treatment alternative for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Despite the increasing population of elderly dialysis patients in Japan, CKM is not as readily available compared with that in North America and Europe. Therefore, it is important to clarify the barriers to CKM in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We interviewed 11 experts to explore their beliefs and issues regarding CKM. Based on the interviews, we categorized the CKM barriers into eight categories and created a 24-item questionnaire. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 112 medical professionals involved in ESKD management. To investigate the types of barriers, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis using the questionnaire results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were obtained from 53 (47.3%) of 112 subjects (18 doctors, 29 nurses, 6 clinical engineers), with 94.3% considering CKM as a treatment option for ESKD. Factor analysis categorized the questions into the following: (1) Lack of palliative care experience, (2) Ethics and responsibility, (3) Patient's problem, (4) Dialog with patients and families, and (5) Lack of support system. Regarding barriers to CKM, \"lack of experience in palliative care\" and \"lack of support system\" scored the highest, and \"ethics and responsibility\" scored the lowest.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Barriers to CKM may be classified into five factors, with \"lack of experience in palliative care\" and \"lack of support system\" being the important barriers to overcome. Additionally, most healthcare professionals consider CKM as the fourth option for renal replacement therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10349,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"1261-1271"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers to conservative kidney management for Japanese healthcare professionals involved in the treatment of end-stage renal disease.\",\"authors\":\"Yumi Sota, Takuya Fujimaru, Kyoko Kobayashi, Kevin Y Urayama, Nozomi Kadota, Kasumi Konishi, Yugo Ito, Masahiko Nagahama, Fumika Taki, Michiko Suzuki, Masaaki Nakayama\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10157-024-02529-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conservative kidney management (CKM) is a treatment alternative for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Despite the increasing population of elderly dialysis patients in Japan, CKM is not as readily available compared with that in North America and Europe. Therefore, it is important to clarify the barriers to CKM in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We interviewed 11 experts to explore their beliefs and issues regarding CKM. Based on the interviews, we categorized the CKM barriers into eight categories and created a 24-item questionnaire. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 112 medical professionals involved in ESKD management. To investigate the types of barriers, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis using the questionnaire results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were obtained from 53 (47.3%) of 112 subjects (18 doctors, 29 nurses, 6 clinical engineers), with 94.3% considering CKM as a treatment option for ESKD. Factor analysis categorized the questions into the following: (1) Lack of palliative care experience, (2) Ethics and responsibility, (3) Patient's problem, (4) Dialog with patients and families, and (5) Lack of support system. Regarding barriers to CKM, \\\"lack of experience in palliative care\\\" and \\\"lack of support system\\\" scored the highest, and \\\"ethics and responsibility\\\" scored the lowest.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Barriers to CKM may be classified into five factors, with \\\"lack of experience in palliative care\\\" and \\\"lack of support system\\\" being the important barriers to overcome. Additionally, most healthcare professionals consider CKM as the fourth option for renal replacement therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1261-1271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-024-02529-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-024-02529-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:保守性肾脏管理(CKM)是终末期肾病(ESKD)患者的一种治疗选择。尽管日本的老年透析患者人数不断增加,但与北美和欧洲相比,保守性肾脏管理并不容易获得。因此,弄清在日本使用 CKM 的障碍非常重要:方法:我们采访了 11 位专家,了解他们对 CKM 的看法和问题。在访谈的基础上,我们将 CKM 障碍分为八类,并制作了一份包含 24 个项目的问卷。我们对参与 ESKD 管理的 112 名专业医务人员进行了问卷调查。为了调查障碍的类型,我们利用问卷结果进行了探索性因子分析:112名受试者(18名医生、29名护士、6名临床工程师)中有53人(47.3%)做出了回答,94.3%的受试者认为CKM是ESKD的一种治疗方案。因子分析将问题分为以下几类:(1)缺乏姑息治疗经验;(2)伦理和责任;(3)患者的问题;(4)与患者和家属的对话;(5)缺乏支持系统。关于慢性病管理的障碍,"缺乏姑息关怀经验 "和 "缺乏支持系统 "得分最高,而 "伦理和责任 "得分最低:CKM的障碍可分为五个因素,其中 "缺乏姑息关怀经验 "和 "缺乏支持系统 "是需要克服的重要障碍。此外,大多数医护人员认为 CKM 是肾脏替代疗法的第四种选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Barriers to conservative kidney management for Japanese healthcare professionals involved in the treatment of end-stage renal disease.

Background: Conservative kidney management (CKM) is a treatment alternative for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Despite the increasing population of elderly dialysis patients in Japan, CKM is not as readily available compared with that in North America and Europe. Therefore, it is important to clarify the barriers to CKM in Japan.

Methods: We interviewed 11 experts to explore their beliefs and issues regarding CKM. Based on the interviews, we categorized the CKM barriers into eight categories and created a 24-item questionnaire. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 112 medical professionals involved in ESKD management. To investigate the types of barriers, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis using the questionnaire results.

Results: Responses were obtained from 53 (47.3%) of 112 subjects (18 doctors, 29 nurses, 6 clinical engineers), with 94.3% considering CKM as a treatment option for ESKD. Factor analysis categorized the questions into the following: (1) Lack of palliative care experience, (2) Ethics and responsibility, (3) Patient's problem, (4) Dialog with patients and families, and (5) Lack of support system. Regarding barriers to CKM, "lack of experience in palliative care" and "lack of support system" scored the highest, and "ethics and responsibility" scored the lowest.

Conclusions: Barriers to CKM may be classified into five factors, with "lack of experience in palliative care" and "lack of support system" being the important barriers to overcome. Additionally, most healthcare professionals consider CKM as the fourth option for renal replacement therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Nephrology is a peer-reviewed monthly journal, officially published by the Japanese Society of Nephrology (JSN) to provide an international forum for the discussion of research and issues relating to the study of nephrology. Out of respect for the founders of the JSN, the title of this journal uses the term “nephrology,” a word created and brought into use with the establishment of the JSN (Japanese Journal of Nephrology, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1960). The journal publishes articles on all aspects of nephrology, including basic, experimental, and clinical research, so as to share the latest research findings and ideas not only with members of the JSN, but with all researchers who wish to contribute to a better understanding of recent advances in nephrology. The journal is unique in that it introduces to an international readership original reports from Japan and also the clinical standards discussed and agreed by JSN.
期刊最新文献
Longitudinal impact of extended-hours hemodialysis with a liberalized diet on nutritional status and survival outcomes: findings from the LIBERTY cohort. Exploring factors associated with Kidney Disease Quality of Life in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: the Reach-J CKD cohort study. Correction: Adolescents and parents' knowledge of chronic kidney disease: the potential of school-based education. Pathophysiology, symptoms, outcomes, and evaluation of hyponatremia: comprehension and best clinical practice. Treatment of hyponatremia: comprehension and best clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1