为开发医疗保健领域数字素养、可用性和可接受性技术工具而进行的试点研究。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1097/CIN.0000000000001156
Lisa L Groom, Dawn Feldthouse, Gina Robertiello, Jason Fletcher, Allison Squires
{"title":"为开发医疗保健领域数字素养、可用性和可接受性技术工具而进行的试点研究。","authors":"Lisa L Groom, Dawn Feldthouse, Gina Robertiello, Jason Fletcher, Allison Squires","doi":"10.1097/CIN.0000000000001156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electronic health record proficiency is critical for health professionals to deliver and document patient care. There is scarce research on this topic within undergraduate nursing student populations. The purpose of this study is to describe the psychometric evaluation of the Digital Literacy, Usability, and Acceptability of Technology Instrument for Healthcare. A cross-sectional pilot study for psychometric evaluation of the instrument was conducted using data collected through an emailed survey. Exploratory factor analysis, inter-item and adjusted item-total correlations, and Cronbach's α calculated subscale reliability. A total of 297 nursing students completed the survey. A seven-factor structure best fit the data: technology use-engagement, technology use-confidence, technology use-history, electronic health record-ease of use, electronic health record-comparability, and electronic health record-burden. Cronbach's α indicated good to very good internal consistency (α = .68 to .89). The instrument effectively measured digital literacy, acceptance, and usability of an electronic health record and may be implemented with good to very good reliability across varied healthcare simulation and training experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":50694,"journal":{"name":"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Pilot Study Toward Development of the Digital Literacy, Usability, and Acceptability of Technology Instrument for Healthcare.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa L Groom, Dawn Feldthouse, Gina Robertiello, Jason Fletcher, Allison Squires\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CIN.0000000000001156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Electronic health record proficiency is critical for health professionals to deliver and document patient care. There is scarce research on this topic within undergraduate nursing student populations. The purpose of this study is to describe the psychometric evaluation of the Digital Literacy, Usability, and Acceptability of Technology Instrument for Healthcare. A cross-sectional pilot study for psychometric evaluation of the instrument was conducted using data collected through an emailed survey. Exploratory factor analysis, inter-item and adjusted item-total correlations, and Cronbach's α calculated subscale reliability. A total of 297 nursing students completed the survey. A seven-factor structure best fit the data: technology use-engagement, technology use-confidence, technology use-history, electronic health record-ease of use, electronic health record-comparability, and electronic health record-burden. Cronbach's α indicated good to very good internal consistency (α = .68 to .89). The instrument effectively measured digital literacy, acceptance, and usability of an electronic health record and may be implemented with good to very good reliability across varied healthcare simulation and training experiences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000001156\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000001156","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

熟练掌握电子健康记录对于医护人员提供和记录病人护理至关重要。在护理专业本科生群体中,有关这一主题的研究很少。本研究的目的是描述数字素养、可用性和医疗保健技术可接受性工具的心理测量评估。通过电子邮件调查收集的数据,对该工具进行了心理测量评估的横断面试点研究。通过探索性因子分析、项目间和调整后的项目-总相关性以及 Cronbach's α 计算出了子量表的信度。共有 297 名护理专业学生完成了调查。七因素结构最适合数据:技术使用-参与、技术使用-信心、技术使用-历史、电子病历-易用性、电子病历-可比性和电子病历-负担。Cronbach's α 表明内部一致性良好至非常好(α = .68 至 .89)。该工具有效地测量了电子健康记录的数字素养、接受度和可用性,在不同的医疗模拟和培训经验中使用时具有良好到非常好的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Pilot Study Toward Development of the Digital Literacy, Usability, and Acceptability of Technology Instrument for Healthcare.

Electronic health record proficiency is critical for health professionals to deliver and document patient care. There is scarce research on this topic within undergraduate nursing student populations. The purpose of this study is to describe the psychometric evaluation of the Digital Literacy, Usability, and Acceptability of Technology Instrument for Healthcare. A cross-sectional pilot study for psychometric evaluation of the instrument was conducted using data collected through an emailed survey. Exploratory factor analysis, inter-item and adjusted item-total correlations, and Cronbach's α calculated subscale reliability. A total of 297 nursing students completed the survey. A seven-factor structure best fit the data: technology use-engagement, technology use-confidence, technology use-history, electronic health record-ease of use, electronic health record-comparability, and electronic health record-burden. Cronbach's α indicated good to very good internal consistency (α = .68 to .89). The instrument effectively measured digital literacy, acceptance, and usability of an electronic health record and may be implemented with good to very good reliability across varied healthcare simulation and training experiences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing
Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing 工程技术-护理
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 30 years, CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing has been at the interface of the science of information and the art of nursing, publishing articles on the latest developments in nursing informatics, research, education and administrative of health information technology. CIN connects you with colleagues as they share knowledge on implementation of electronic health records systems, design decision-support systems, incorporate evidence-based healthcare in practice, explore point-of-care computing in practice and education, and conceptually integrate nursing languages and standard data sets. Continuing education contact hours are available in every issue.
期刊最新文献
A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study to Determine the Effect of Real-Time Videos With Smart Glass on the Performance of the Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. A Question Answering Chatbot for Gastric Cancer Patients After Curative Gastrectomy: Development and Evaluation of User Experience and Performance. Migrating Mobile Applications to the Web: Adult Crash Cart Training. Relationship Between Individual Innovativeness Levels and Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence Among Nursing and Midwifery Students. The Content, Reliability, and Quality of Insulin Pen Injection Videos on YouTube as Patient Education Resource.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1