1932-LB: 国家糖尿病预防计划的成本效益--一项为期两年的前瞻性真实世界研究

IF 6.2 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI:10.2337/db24-1932-lb
SHIHCHEN KUO, WEN YE, DI WANG, LAURA N. MCEWEN, CLAUDIA VILLATORO SANTOS, WILLIAM H. HERMAN
{"title":"1932-LB: 国家糖尿病预防计划的成本效益--一项为期两年的前瞻性真实世界研究","authors":"SHIHCHEN KUO, WEN YE, DI WANG, LAURA N. MCEWEN, CLAUDIA VILLATORO SANTOS, WILLIAM H. HERMAN","doi":"10.2337/db24-1932-lb","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Few studies have examined the cost-effectiveness of the National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP) in real-world settings. We evaluated the real-world cost-effectiveness of the NDPP in people with prediabetes in a large workforce with employer-sponsored health insurance. We performed individual-level, empirical data analyses using surveys and health insurance claims for 6,179 adult employees, dependents, and retirees with prediabetes who enrolled (n=592) or did not enroll (n=5,587) in the NDPP. We assessed direct medical costs the year before NDPP enrollment/index date (baseline) through 2 years afterward, EQ-5D-5L utility scores at baseline and 2 years afterward, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over 2 years for NDPP enrollees and non-enrollees. We applied propensity score weighting to adjust for bias due to self-selection for enrollment, multiple imputations to handle missing data, and bootstrap method to produce confidence intervals (CIs). We adopted a health system perspective and discounted costs and QALYs at 3% annually. Costs were expressed in 2020 U.S. dollars. Compared to non-enrollees, the average reduction in direct medical costs per enrollee was $3,979 (95% CI: -$11,962 to $2,019) over 2 years. The cost savings were primarily related to fewer hospitalizations (-$3,016), outpatient visits (-$639), and emergency room visits (-$272) among enrollees. Each enrollee accrued 1.726 QALYs and each non-enrollee accrued 1.702 QALYs over 2 years, representing a gain of 0.024 (95% CI: -0.007 to 0.052) QALY per enrollee. The uncertainty analyses showed a high probability (75%) of cost savings, and an 89% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY gained, for NDPP enrollees versus non-enrollees. In this real-world population with prediabetes, enrollment in the NDPP was likely to provide cost savings and improve quality-adjusted life-expectancy. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings. Disclosure S. Kuo: None. W. Ye: None. D. Wang: None. L.N. McEwen: None. C. Villatoro Santos: None. W.H. Herman: Consultant; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Advisory Panel; American Diabetes Association. Other Relationship; National Institutes of Health. Advisory Panel; National Committee for Quality Assurance. Funding National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK109995 and P30DK092926), and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U18DP006712)","PeriodicalId":11376,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"1932-LB: Cost-Effectiveness of the National Diabetes Prevention Program—A Real-World, Two-Year Prospective Study\",\"authors\":\"SHIHCHEN KUO, WEN YE, DI WANG, LAURA N. MCEWEN, CLAUDIA VILLATORO SANTOS, WILLIAM H. HERMAN\",\"doi\":\"10.2337/db24-1932-lb\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Few studies have examined the cost-effectiveness of the National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP) in real-world settings. We evaluated the real-world cost-effectiveness of the NDPP in people with prediabetes in a large workforce with employer-sponsored health insurance. We performed individual-level, empirical data analyses using surveys and health insurance claims for 6,179 adult employees, dependents, and retirees with prediabetes who enrolled (n=592) or did not enroll (n=5,587) in the NDPP. We assessed direct medical costs the year before NDPP enrollment/index date (baseline) through 2 years afterward, EQ-5D-5L utility scores at baseline and 2 years afterward, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over 2 years for NDPP enrollees and non-enrollees. We applied propensity score weighting to adjust for bias due to self-selection for enrollment, multiple imputations to handle missing data, and bootstrap method to produce confidence intervals (CIs). We adopted a health system perspective and discounted costs and QALYs at 3% annually. Costs were expressed in 2020 U.S. dollars. Compared to non-enrollees, the average reduction in direct medical costs per enrollee was $3,979 (95% CI: -$11,962 to $2,019) over 2 years. The cost savings were primarily related to fewer hospitalizations (-$3,016), outpatient visits (-$639), and emergency room visits (-$272) among enrollees. Each enrollee accrued 1.726 QALYs and each non-enrollee accrued 1.702 QALYs over 2 years, representing a gain of 0.024 (95% CI: -0.007 to 0.052) QALY per enrollee. The uncertainty analyses showed a high probability (75%) of cost savings, and an 89% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY gained, for NDPP enrollees versus non-enrollees. In this real-world population with prediabetes, enrollment in the NDPP was likely to provide cost savings and improve quality-adjusted life-expectancy. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings. Disclosure S. Kuo: None. W. Ye: None. D. Wang: None. L.N. McEwen: None. C. Villatoro Santos: None. W.H. Herman: Consultant; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Advisory Panel; American Diabetes Association. Other Relationship; National Institutes of Health. Advisory Panel; National Committee for Quality Assurance. Funding National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK109995 and P30DK092926), and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U18DP006712)\",\"PeriodicalId\":11376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2337/db24-1932-lb\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/db24-1932-lb","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

很少有研究对全国糖尿病预防计划(NDPP)在实际环境中的成本效益进行研究。我们评估了国家糖尿病预防计划在现实世界中的成本效益,该计划针对的是一个由雇主提供医疗保险的大型劳动力群体中的糖尿病前期患者。我们对 6179 名患有糖尿病前期的成年雇员、家属和退休人员进行了个人层面的实证数据分析,这些人参加(人数=592)或未参加(人数=5587)NDPP。我们评估了 NDPP 参保者和未参保者在 NDPP 参保/指数日期(基线)前一年至之后 2 年的直接医疗费用、基线和之后 2 年的 EQ-5D-5L 实用性评分以及 2 年的质量调整生命年 (QALY)。我们采用倾向得分加权法来调整因自我选择加入而产生的偏差,采用多重推定法来处理缺失数据,并采用自举法得出置信区间 (CI)。我们从卫生系统的角度出发,将成本和 QALYs 每年贴现 3%。成本以 2020 年美元表示。与未参保者相比,2 年内每位参保者的直接医疗成本平均减少了 3,979 美元(95% CI:-11,962 美元至 2,019 美元)。节省的费用主要与参保者住院次数(-3,016 美元)、门诊次数(-639 美元)和急诊次数(-272 美元)的减少有关。每名参保者在 2 年内可获得 1.726 QALY,每名非参保者可获得 1.702 QALY,即每名参保者可获得 0.024(95% CI:-0.007 至 0.052)QALY。不确定性分析表明,NDPP 参保者与非参保者相比,成本节约的可能性很高(75%),在每 QALY 收益 100,000 美元的支付意愿阈值下,成本效益的可能性为 89%。在这一现实世界中的糖尿病前期人群中,参加 NDPP 有可能节约成本并提高质量调整寿命。我们需要进一步研究来证实这些发现。披露 S. Kuo:无。W. Ye:无。D. Wang:无。L.N. McEwen:无。C. Villatoro Santos:无。W.H. Herman:顾问;Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.顾问团;美国糖尿病协会。其他关系;美国国立卫生研究院。顾问团;国家质量保证委员会。国家糖尿病、消化道和肾脏疾病研究所 (R01DK109995 和 P30DK092926) 和美国疾病控制和预防中心 (U18DP006712) 资助
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1932-LB: Cost-Effectiveness of the National Diabetes Prevention Program—A Real-World, Two-Year Prospective Study
Few studies have examined the cost-effectiveness of the National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP) in real-world settings. We evaluated the real-world cost-effectiveness of the NDPP in people with prediabetes in a large workforce with employer-sponsored health insurance. We performed individual-level, empirical data analyses using surveys and health insurance claims for 6,179 adult employees, dependents, and retirees with prediabetes who enrolled (n=592) or did not enroll (n=5,587) in the NDPP. We assessed direct medical costs the year before NDPP enrollment/index date (baseline) through 2 years afterward, EQ-5D-5L utility scores at baseline and 2 years afterward, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over 2 years for NDPP enrollees and non-enrollees. We applied propensity score weighting to adjust for bias due to self-selection for enrollment, multiple imputations to handle missing data, and bootstrap method to produce confidence intervals (CIs). We adopted a health system perspective and discounted costs and QALYs at 3% annually. Costs were expressed in 2020 U.S. dollars. Compared to non-enrollees, the average reduction in direct medical costs per enrollee was $3,979 (95% CI: -$11,962 to $2,019) over 2 years. The cost savings were primarily related to fewer hospitalizations (-$3,016), outpatient visits (-$639), and emergency room visits (-$272) among enrollees. Each enrollee accrued 1.726 QALYs and each non-enrollee accrued 1.702 QALYs over 2 years, representing a gain of 0.024 (95% CI: -0.007 to 0.052) QALY per enrollee. The uncertainty analyses showed a high probability (75%) of cost savings, and an 89% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY gained, for NDPP enrollees versus non-enrollees. In this real-world population with prediabetes, enrollment in the NDPP was likely to provide cost savings and improve quality-adjusted life-expectancy. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings. Disclosure S. Kuo: None. W. Ye: None. D. Wang: None. L.N. McEwen: None. C. Villatoro Santos: None. W.H. Herman: Consultant; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Advisory Panel; American Diabetes Association. Other Relationship; National Institutes of Health. Advisory Panel; National Committee for Quality Assurance. Funding National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK109995 and P30DK092926), and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U18DP006712)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes
Diabetes 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1968
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Diabetes is a scientific journal that publishes original research exploring the physiological and pathophysiological aspects of diabetes mellitus. We encourage submissions of manuscripts pertaining to laboratory, animal, or human research, covering a wide range of topics. Our primary focus is on investigative reports investigating various aspects such as the development and progression of diabetes, along with its associated complications. We also welcome studies delving into normal and pathological pancreatic islet function and intermediary metabolism, as well as exploring the mechanisms of drug and hormone action from a pharmacological perspective. Additionally, we encourage submissions that delve into the biochemical and molecular aspects of both normal and abnormal biological processes. However, it is important to note that we do not publish studies relating to diabetes education or the application of accepted therapeutic and diagnostic approaches to patients with diabetes mellitus. Our aim is to provide a platform for research that contributes to advancing our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and processes of diabetes.
期刊最新文献
N 6-Methyladenosine demethylase FTO controls macrophage homeostasis in diabetic vasculopathy Emerging concepts and success stories in type 1 diabetes research: a roadmap for a bright future Induction of a Müller glial-specific protective pathway safeguards the retina from diabetes induced damage Long-term nerve regeneration in diabetic keratopathy mediated by a novel NGF delivery system Effect of Hyperketonemia on Myocardial Function in Patients with Heart Failure and Type 2 Diabetes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1