{"title":"欧盟和日本对 AAV 向量的 GMO 监管要求的比较分析,重点是脱落数据和遏制措施。","authors":"Hirokuni Mizoguchi, Tobias Fleischmann, Masato Komuro, Takahiro Hirai, Akiko Ikeda, Kojiro Saito, Tomohiro Watahiki, Gentaro Tajima","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2024.2371042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recombinant viral-based gene therapy products, such as those incorporating adeno-associated viruses (AAVs), fall under the category of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The European Union (EU) countries and Japan must obtain environmental risk assessment (ERA) approval for the use of GMOs before starting any clinical trials. It has been reported that the development of GMO-containing products in these two regions encounters several regulatory obstacles due to the longer regulatory procedures and document preparation for ERA.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this article, we comparatively analyzed the ERA document requirements in the EU and Japan for AAV-based recombinant medicinal products to highlight the differences in the context of potential future attempts of convergence. Additionally, we analyzed non-clinical and clinical shedding data requirements, which are key components of ERA reviews in the EU and Japan. Lastly, we compared the containment measures to minimize the spread of GMOs in the environment in the EU and Japan.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Based on our comparative analysis, we present several policy recommendations of standardizing and simplifying the application materials and procedures for the ERA regulations on GMOs in the EU and Japan in the mid-, and long-term timeframe to achieve global regulatory convergence.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"529-542"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of GMO regulatory requirements for AAV vectors in the EU and Japan focusing on the shedding data and containment measures.\",\"authors\":\"Hirokuni Mizoguchi, Tobias Fleischmann, Masato Komuro, Takahiro Hirai, Akiko Ikeda, Kojiro Saito, Tomohiro Watahiki, Gentaro Tajima\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14712598.2024.2371042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recombinant viral-based gene therapy products, such as those incorporating adeno-associated viruses (AAVs), fall under the category of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The European Union (EU) countries and Japan must obtain environmental risk assessment (ERA) approval for the use of GMOs before starting any clinical trials. It has been reported that the development of GMO-containing products in these two regions encounters several regulatory obstacles due to the longer regulatory procedures and document preparation for ERA.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this article, we comparatively analyzed the ERA document requirements in the EU and Japan for AAV-based recombinant medicinal products to highlight the differences in the context of potential future attempts of convergence. Additionally, we analyzed non-clinical and clinical shedding data requirements, which are key components of ERA reviews in the EU and Japan. Lastly, we compared the containment measures to minimize the spread of GMOs in the environment in the EU and Japan.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Based on our comparative analysis, we present several policy recommendations of standardizing and simplifying the application materials and procedures for the ERA regulations on GMOs in the EU and Japan in the mid-, and long-term timeframe to achieve global regulatory convergence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"529-542\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2024.2371042\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2024.2371042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:以重组病毒为基础的基因治疗产品,如含有腺相关病毒(AAV)的产品,属于转基因生物(GMO)的范畴。欧盟国家和日本在使用转基因生物进行临床试验之前,必须获得环境风险评估(ERA)批准。据报道,由于ERA的监管程序和文件准备时间较长,在这两个地区开发含有转基因生物的产品会遇到一些监管障碍:在本文中,我们比较分析了欧盟和日本对基于 AAV 的重组药物产品的 ERA 文件要求,以突出在未来可能的趋同尝试中存在的差异。此外,我们还分析了非临床和临床脱落数据要求,这是欧盟和日本 ERA 审查的关键组成部分。最后,我们比较了欧盟和日本为尽量减少转基因生物在环境中扩散而采取的遏制措施:根据我们的比较分析,我们提出了若干政策建议,即在中长期内规范和简化欧盟和日本转基因生物ERA法规的申请材料和程序,以实现全球法规趋同。
Comparative analysis of GMO regulatory requirements for AAV vectors in the EU and Japan focusing on the shedding data and containment measures.
Introduction: Recombinant viral-based gene therapy products, such as those incorporating adeno-associated viruses (AAVs), fall under the category of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The European Union (EU) countries and Japan must obtain environmental risk assessment (ERA) approval for the use of GMOs before starting any clinical trials. It has been reported that the development of GMO-containing products in these two regions encounters several regulatory obstacles due to the longer regulatory procedures and document preparation for ERA.
Areas covered: In this article, we comparatively analyzed the ERA document requirements in the EU and Japan for AAV-based recombinant medicinal products to highlight the differences in the context of potential future attempts of convergence. Additionally, we analyzed non-clinical and clinical shedding data requirements, which are key components of ERA reviews in the EU and Japan. Lastly, we compared the containment measures to minimize the spread of GMOs in the environment in the EU and Japan.
Expert opinion: Based on our comparative analysis, we present several policy recommendations of standardizing and simplifying the application materials and procedures for the ERA regulations on GMOs in the EU and Japan in the mid-, and long-term timeframe to achieve global regulatory convergence.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (1471-2598; 1744-7682) is a MEDLINE-indexed, international journal publishing peer-reviewed research across all aspects of biological therapy.
Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the impact of the topic on research and clinical practice and the scope for future development.
The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and biopharmaceutical industries and others closely involved in the development and application of biological therapies for the treatment of human disease.
The journal welcomes:
Reviews covering therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, peptides and proteins, gene therapies and gene transfer technologies, cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine
Drug evaluations reviewing the clinical data on a particular biological agent
Original research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on biological agents and biotherapeutic-based studies with a strong link to clinical practice
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Collection format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results;
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.