利用集合人工智能学习模型对突发性感音神经性听力损失进行预后预测

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Otology & Neurotology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004241
Kuan-Hui Li, Chen-Yu Chien, Shu-Yu Tai, Leong-Perng Chan, Ning-Chia Chang, Ling-Feng Wang, Kuen-Yao Ho, Yu-Jui Lien, Wen-Hsien Ho
{"title":"利用集合人工智能学习模型对突发性感音神经性听力损失进行预后预测","authors":"Kuan-Hui Li, Chen-Yu Chien, Shu-Yu Tai, Leong-Perng Chan, Ning-Chia Chang, Ling-Feng Wang, Kuen-Yao Ho, Yu-Jui Lien, Wen-Hsien Ho","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We used simple variables to construct prognostic prediction ensemble learning models for patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospectively study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary medical center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>1,572 patients with SSNHL.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Prognostic.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>We selected four variables, namely, age, days after onset of hearing loss, vertigo, and type of hearing loss. We also compared the accuracy between different ensemble learning models based on the boosting, bagging, AdaBoost, and stacking algorithms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 1,572 patients with SSNHL; 73.5% of them showed improving and 26.5% did not. Significant between-group differences were noted in terms of age ( p = 0.011), days after onset of hearing loss ( p < 0.001), and concurrent vertigo ( p < 0.001), indicating that the patients who showed improving to treatment were younger and had fewer days after onset and fewer vertigo symptoms. Among ensemble learning models, the AdaBoost algorithm, compared with the other algorithms, achieved higher accuracy (82.89%), higher precision (86.66%), a higher F1 score (89.20), and a larger area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (0.79), as indicated by test results of a dataset with 10 independent runs. Furthermore, Gini scores indicated that age and days after onset are two key parameters of the predictive model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AdaBoost model is an effective model for predicting SSNHL. The use of simple parameters can increase its practicality and applicability in remote medical care. Moreover, age may be a key factor influencing prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognosis Prediction of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Ensemble Artificial Intelligence Learning Models.\",\"authors\":\"Kuan-Hui Li, Chen-Yu Chien, Shu-Yu Tai, Leong-Perng Chan, Ning-Chia Chang, Ling-Feng Wang, Kuen-Yao Ho, Yu-Jui Lien, Wen-Hsien Ho\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We used simple variables to construct prognostic prediction ensemble learning models for patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospectively study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary medical center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>1,572 patients with SSNHL.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Prognostic.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>We selected four variables, namely, age, days after onset of hearing loss, vertigo, and type of hearing loss. We also compared the accuracy between different ensemble learning models based on the boosting, bagging, AdaBoost, and stacking algorithms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 1,572 patients with SSNHL; 73.5% of them showed improving and 26.5% did not. Significant between-group differences were noted in terms of age ( p = 0.011), days after onset of hearing loss ( p < 0.001), and concurrent vertigo ( p < 0.001), indicating that the patients who showed improving to treatment were younger and had fewer days after onset and fewer vertigo symptoms. Among ensemble learning models, the AdaBoost algorithm, compared with the other algorithms, achieved higher accuracy (82.89%), higher precision (86.66%), a higher F1 score (89.20), and a larger area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (0.79), as indicated by test results of a dataset with 10 independent runs. Furthermore, Gini scores indicated that age and days after onset are two key parameters of the predictive model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AdaBoost model is an effective model for predicting SSNHL. The use of simple parameters can increase its practicality and applicability in remote medical care. Moreover, age may be a key factor influencing prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004241\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004241","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的我们利用简单变量构建了突发性感音神经性听力损失(SSNHL)患者的预后预测集合学习模型:回顾性研究:三级医疗中心:干预措施:预后:主要结果测量我们选择了四个变量,即年龄、听力损失发生后的天数、眩晕和听力损失类型。我们还比较了不同集合学习模型的准确性,这些模型分别基于提升算法、套袋算法、AdaBoost 算法和堆叠算法:我们招募了 1,572 名 SSNHL 患者,其中 73.5% 的患者听力有所改善,26.5% 的患者听力没有改善。在年龄(p = 0.011)、听力损失发病后天数(p < 0.001)和并发眩晕(p < 0.001)方面,组间存在显著差异,表明治疗后病情好转的患者更年轻,发病后天数更短,眩晕症状更少。在集合学习模型中,AdaBoost 算法与其他算法相比,准确率更高(82.89%),精确度更高(86.66%),F1 分数更高(89.20),接收者工作特征曲线下面积更大(0.79),这是由 10 次独立运行的数据集的测试结果显示的。此外,吉尼评分表明,年龄和发病后天数是预测模型的两个关键参数:结论:AdaBoost 模型是预测 SSNHL 的有效模型。结论:AdaBoost 模型是预测 SSNHL 的有效模型,使用简单的参数可提高其实用性和在远程医疗中的适用性。此外,年龄可能是影响预后的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prognosis Prediction of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Ensemble Artificial Intelligence Learning Models.

Objective: We used simple variables to construct prognostic prediction ensemble learning models for patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL).

Study design: Retrospectively study.

Setting: Tertiary medical center.

Patients: 1,572 patients with SSNHL.

Intervention: Prognostic.

Main outcome measures: We selected four variables, namely, age, days after onset of hearing loss, vertigo, and type of hearing loss. We also compared the accuracy between different ensemble learning models based on the boosting, bagging, AdaBoost, and stacking algorithms.

Results: We enrolled 1,572 patients with SSNHL; 73.5% of them showed improving and 26.5% did not. Significant between-group differences were noted in terms of age ( p = 0.011), days after onset of hearing loss ( p < 0.001), and concurrent vertigo ( p < 0.001), indicating that the patients who showed improving to treatment were younger and had fewer days after onset and fewer vertigo symptoms. Among ensemble learning models, the AdaBoost algorithm, compared with the other algorithms, achieved higher accuracy (82.89%), higher precision (86.66%), a higher F1 score (89.20), and a larger area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (0.79), as indicated by test results of a dataset with 10 independent runs. Furthermore, Gini scores indicated that age and days after onset are two key parameters of the predictive model.

Conclusions: The AdaBoost model is an effective model for predicting SSNHL. The use of simple parameters can increase its practicality and applicability in remote medical care. Moreover, age may be a key factor influencing prognosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes After Transcutaneous Bone-Conduction Implantation in Adults and Children: Erratum. Mendelian Randomization Study Reveals a Predicted Relationship between Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Mitochondrial Proteins. Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Patients With Sporadic Inner Ear Schwannomas With and Without Simultaneous Tumor Resection. Fracture of the Promontory Following Myringotomy. Use of Speech-to-Text Translation Resources to Address Communication Barriers in Patients With Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1