{"title":"类风湿性关节炎的全因和特因死亡率:一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Young Ho Lee, Gwan Gyu Song","doi":"10.1007/s00393-024-01538-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for both all-cause and cause-specific mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an extensive search across the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify studies investigating SMRs for all-cause and/or cause-specific mortality in individuals with RA compared to the general population. Subsequently, we performed a comprehensive meta-analysis, examining SMRs across various categories, including all-cause, sex-specific, ethnicity-specific, and cause-specific SMRs in RA patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies involving 486,098 patients with RA and 63,988 deaths met the inclusion criteria. Patients with RA had a 1.522-fold increase in all-cause SMR (SMR 1.522, 95% CI 1.340-1.704, p < 0.001) compared to the general population. Stratification by ethnicity revealed that the all-cause SMR was 1.575 (95% CI 1.207-1.943) in Caucasians and 1.355 (95% CI 1.140-1.569) in Asians. The gender-specific meta-analysis revealed elevated SMR in both women and men. RA patients exhibited an increased risk of mortality attributed to cardiovascular disease (CVD), respiratory disease, infection, and cerebrovascular accidents (CVA). However, no significant increase in SMR was observed for mortality due to malignancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis study highlights a 1.522-fold increase in SMR in patients with RA compared to that in the general population, irrespective of sex or region. Additionally, a notable increase in mortality associated with specific causes, including CVD, respiratory disease, infection, and CVA, underscores the critical need for targeted interventions to manage these heightened risks in patients with RA.</p>","PeriodicalId":23834,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"All-cause and cause-specific mortality in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Young Ho Lee, Gwan Gyu Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00393-024-01538-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for both all-cause and cause-specific mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an extensive search across the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify studies investigating SMRs for all-cause and/or cause-specific mortality in individuals with RA compared to the general population. Subsequently, we performed a comprehensive meta-analysis, examining SMRs across various categories, including all-cause, sex-specific, ethnicity-specific, and cause-specific SMRs in RA patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies involving 486,098 patients with RA and 63,988 deaths met the inclusion criteria. Patients with RA had a 1.522-fold increase in all-cause SMR (SMR 1.522, 95% CI 1.340-1.704, p < 0.001) compared to the general population. Stratification by ethnicity revealed that the all-cause SMR was 1.575 (95% CI 1.207-1.943) in Caucasians and 1.355 (95% CI 1.140-1.569) in Asians. The gender-specific meta-analysis revealed elevated SMR in both women and men. RA patients exhibited an increased risk of mortality attributed to cardiovascular disease (CVD), respiratory disease, infection, and cerebrovascular accidents (CVA). However, no significant increase in SMR was observed for mortality due to malignancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis study highlights a 1.522-fold increase in SMR in patients with RA compared to that in the general population, irrespective of sex or region. Additionally, a notable increase in mortality associated with specific causes, including CVD, respiratory disease, infection, and CVA, underscores the critical need for targeted interventions to manage these heightened risks in patients with RA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-024-01538-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-024-01538-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的本研究旨在评估类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者全因死亡率和病因特异性死亡率的标准化死亡率比(SMRs):我们在 Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库中进行了广泛搜索,以确定与普通人群相比,调查类风湿性关节炎患者全因和/或病因特异性死亡率标准化死亡率的研究。随后,我们进行了一项全面的荟萃分析,研究了不同类别的SMRs,包括RA患者的全因、性别特异性、种族特异性和病因特异性SMRs:符合纳入标准的研究有 17 项,涉及 486,098 名 RA 患者和 63,988 例死亡病例。RA患者的全因SMR增加了1.522倍(SMR 1.522,95% CI 1.340-1.704,P 结论:这项荟萃分析研究发现,RA患者的全因SMR增加了1.522倍:这项荟萃分析研究表明,与普通人群相比,RA 患者的全因死亡率增加了 1.522 倍,与性别和地区无关。此外,与心血管疾病、呼吸系统疾病、感染和脑梗死等特定原因相关的死亡率明显增加,这突出表明亟需采取有针对性的干预措施来控制 RA 患者的这些高风险。
All-cause and cause-specific mortality in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for both all-cause and cause-specific mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Methods: We conducted an extensive search across the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify studies investigating SMRs for all-cause and/or cause-specific mortality in individuals with RA compared to the general population. Subsequently, we performed a comprehensive meta-analysis, examining SMRs across various categories, including all-cause, sex-specific, ethnicity-specific, and cause-specific SMRs in RA patients.
Results: Seventeen studies involving 486,098 patients with RA and 63,988 deaths met the inclusion criteria. Patients with RA had a 1.522-fold increase in all-cause SMR (SMR 1.522, 95% CI 1.340-1.704, p < 0.001) compared to the general population. Stratification by ethnicity revealed that the all-cause SMR was 1.575 (95% CI 1.207-1.943) in Caucasians and 1.355 (95% CI 1.140-1.569) in Asians. The gender-specific meta-analysis revealed elevated SMR in both women and men. RA patients exhibited an increased risk of mortality attributed to cardiovascular disease (CVD), respiratory disease, infection, and cerebrovascular accidents (CVA). However, no significant increase in SMR was observed for mortality due to malignancy.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis study highlights a 1.522-fold increase in SMR in patients with RA compared to that in the general population, irrespective of sex or region. Additionally, a notable increase in mortality associated with specific causes, including CVD, respiratory disease, infection, and CVA, underscores the critical need for targeted interventions to manage these heightened risks in patients with RA.
期刊介绍:
Die Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie ist ein international angesehenes Publikationsorgan und dient der Fortbildung von niedergelassenen und in der Klinik tätigen Rheumatologen. Die Zeitschrift widmet sich allen Aspekten der klinischen Rheumatologie, der Therapie rheumatischer Erkrankungen sowie der rheumatologischen Grundlagenforschung.
Umfassende Übersichtsarbeiten zu einem aktuellen Schwerpunktthema sind das Kernstück jeder Ausgabe. Im Mittelpunkt steht dabei gesichertes Wissen zu Diagnostik und Therapie mit hoher Relevanz für die tägliche Arbeit – der Leser erhält konkrete Handlungsempfehlungen.
Frei eingereichte Originalien ermöglichen die Präsentation wichtiger klinischer Studien und dienen dem wissenschaftlichen Austausch.