人工智能在泌尿系结石感染风险中的应用:范围综述。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Minerva Urology and Nephrology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05686-6
Davide Campobasso, Matteo Panizzi, Valentina Bellini, Stefania Ferretti, Daniele Amparore, Daniele Castellani, Cristian Fiori, Stefano Puliatti, Amelia Pietropaolo, Bhaskar K Somani, Salvatore Micali, Francesco Porpiglia, Umberto V Maestroni, Elena G Bignami
{"title":"人工智能在泌尿系结石感染风险中的应用:范围综述。","authors":"Davide Campobasso, Matteo Panizzi, Valentina Bellini, Stefania Ferretti, Daniele Amparore, Daniele Castellani, Cristian Fiori, Stefano Puliatti, Amelia Pietropaolo, Bhaskar K Somani, Salvatore Micali, Francesco Porpiglia, Umberto V Maestroni, Elena G Bignami","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05686-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Artificial intelligence and machine learning are the new frontier in urology; they can assist the diagnostic work-up and in prognostication bring superior to the existing nomograms. Infectious events and in particular the septic risk, are one of the most common and in some cases life threatening complication in patients with urolithiasis. We performed a scoping review to provide an overview of the current application of AI in prediction the infectious complications in patients affected by urolithiasis.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A systematic scoping review of the literature was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines by screening Medline, PubMed, and Embase to detect pertinent studies.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>A total of 467 articles were found, of which nine met the inclusion criteria and were considered. All studies are retrospective and published between 2021 and 2023. Only two studies performed an external validation of the described models. The main event considered is urosepsis in four articles, urinary tract infection in two articles and diagnosis of infection stones in three articles. Different AI models were trained, each of which exploited several types and numbers of variables. All studies reveal good performance. Random forest and artificial neural networks seem to have higher AUC, specificity and sensibility and perform better than the traditional statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Further prospective and multi-institutional studies with external validation are needed to better clarify which variables and AI models should be integrated in our clinical practice to predict infectious events.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"76 3","pages":"295-302"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of AI in urolithiasis risk of infection: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Davide Campobasso, Matteo Panizzi, Valentina Bellini, Stefania Ferretti, Daniele Amparore, Daniele Castellani, Cristian Fiori, Stefano Puliatti, Amelia Pietropaolo, Bhaskar K Somani, Salvatore Micali, Francesco Porpiglia, Umberto V Maestroni, Elena G Bignami\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05686-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Artificial intelligence and machine learning are the new frontier in urology; they can assist the diagnostic work-up and in prognostication bring superior to the existing nomograms. Infectious events and in particular the septic risk, are one of the most common and in some cases life threatening complication in patients with urolithiasis. We performed a scoping review to provide an overview of the current application of AI in prediction the infectious complications in patients affected by urolithiasis.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A systematic scoping review of the literature was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines by screening Medline, PubMed, and Embase to detect pertinent studies.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>A total of 467 articles were found, of which nine met the inclusion criteria and were considered. All studies are retrospective and published between 2021 and 2023. Only two studies performed an external validation of the described models. The main event considered is urosepsis in four articles, urinary tract infection in two articles and diagnosis of infection stones in three articles. Different AI models were trained, each of which exploited several types and numbers of variables. All studies reveal good performance. Random forest and artificial neural networks seem to have higher AUC, specificity and sensibility and perform better than the traditional statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Further prospective and multi-institutional studies with external validation are needed to better clarify which variables and AI models should be integrated in our clinical practice to predict infectious events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva Urology and Nephrology\",\"volume\":\"76 3\",\"pages\":\"295-302\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva Urology and Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05686-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05686-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介人工智能和机器学习是泌尿外科的新前沿;它们可以协助诊断工作,并在预后方面优于现有的提名图。感染事件,尤其是脓毒症风险,是泌尿系结石患者最常见的并发症之一,在某些情况下甚至危及生命。我们对人工智能在预测泌尿系结石患者感染并发症方面的应用进行了一次范围性综述:证据综述:我们根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses for Scoping Reviews,PRISMA-ScR)指南,通过筛选 Medline、PubMed 和 Embase 来检测相关研究,对文献进行了系统的范围界定综述:共找到 467 篇文章,其中 9 篇符合纳入标准并被考虑。所有研究均为回顾性研究,发表于 2021 年至 2023 年之间。只有两项研究对所述模型进行了外部验证。四篇文章考虑的主要事件是尿毒症,两篇文章考虑的主要事件是尿路感染,三篇文章考虑的主要事件是感染结石的诊断。对不同的人工智能模型进行了训练,每个模型都利用了多种类型和数量的变量。所有研究都显示出良好的性能。随机森林和人工神经网络似乎具有更高的AUC、特异性和敏感性,比传统的统计分析方法表现更好:需要进一步开展具有外部验证的前瞻性多机构研究,以更好地明确哪些变量和人工智能模型应纳入我们的临床实践,用于预测感染性事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Application of AI in urolithiasis risk of infection: a scoping review.

Introduction: Artificial intelligence and machine learning are the new frontier in urology; they can assist the diagnostic work-up and in prognostication bring superior to the existing nomograms. Infectious events and in particular the septic risk, are one of the most common and in some cases life threatening complication in patients with urolithiasis. We performed a scoping review to provide an overview of the current application of AI in prediction the infectious complications in patients affected by urolithiasis.

Evidence acquisition: A systematic scoping review of the literature was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines by screening Medline, PubMed, and Embase to detect pertinent studies.

Evidence synthesis: A total of 467 articles were found, of which nine met the inclusion criteria and were considered. All studies are retrospective and published between 2021 and 2023. Only two studies performed an external validation of the described models. The main event considered is urosepsis in four articles, urinary tract infection in two articles and diagnosis of infection stones in three articles. Different AI models were trained, each of which exploited several types and numbers of variables. All studies reveal good performance. Random forest and artificial neural networks seem to have higher AUC, specificity and sensibility and perform better than the traditional statistical analysis.

Conclusions: Further prospective and multi-institutional studies with external validation are needed to better clarify which variables and AI models should be integrated in our clinical practice to predict infectious events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva Urology and Nephrology
Minerva Urology and Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
32.70%
发文量
237
期刊最新文献
Modified robot-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for adult patients with horseshoe kidney: techniques and medium-term outcomes. Partial penectomy with reconstruction using a split-thickness skin graft: a multicenter experience. Robot-assisted retroperitoneoscopic kidney surgery with Versius®. The association between MET c.3328G>A p.Val1110Ile mutation and renal cell carcinomas in a specific population: data on histology, focality, onset and the need for surgery from a monocentric study. Augmentation cystoplasty in children with neuropathic bladder: long-term outcomes after 30 years experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1