印度奥迪沙邦医院的患者满意度和基于价值的采购。

IF 8.4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Bulletin of the World Health Organization Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-04 DOI:10.2471/BLT.24.290519
Liana Woskie, Anuska Kalita, Bijetri Bose, Arpita Chakraborty, Kirti Gupta, Winnie Yip
{"title":"印度奥迪沙邦医院的患者满意度和基于价值的采购。","authors":"Liana Woskie, Anuska Kalita, Bijetri Bose, Arpita Chakraborty, Kirti Gupta, Winnie Yip","doi":"10.2471/BLT.24.290519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine how a general inpatient satisfaction survey functions as a hospital performance measure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a mixed-methods pilot study of the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Health Providers and Systems survey in Odisha, India. We divided the study into three steps: cognitive testing of the survey, item testing with exploratory factor analysis and content validity indexing. Cognitive testing involved 50 participants discussing their interpretation of survey items. The survey was then administered to 507 inpatients across five public hospitals in Odisha, followed by exploratory factor analysis. Finally, we interviewed 15 individuals to evaluate the content validity of the survey items.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Cognitive testing revealed that six out of 18 survey questions were not consistently understood within the Odisha inpatient setting, highlighting issues around responsibilities for care. Exploratory factor analysis identified a six-factor structure explaining 66.7% of the variance. Regression models showed that interpersonal care from doctors and nurses had the strongest association with overall satisfaction. An assessment of differential item functioning revealed that patients with a socially marginalized caste reported higher disrespectful care, though this did not translate into differences in reported satisfaction. Content validity indexing suggested that discordance between experiences of disrespectful care and satisfaction ratings might be due to low patient expectations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using satisfaction ratings without nuanced approaches in value-based purchasing programmes may mask poor-quality interpersonal services, particularly for historically marginalized patients. Surveys should be designed to accurately capture true levels of dissatisfaction, ensuring that patient concerns are not hidden.</p>","PeriodicalId":9465,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the World Health Organization","volume":"102 7","pages":"509-520"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11197647/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient satisfaction and value based purchasing in hospitals, Odisha, India.\",\"authors\":\"Liana Woskie, Anuska Kalita, Bijetri Bose, Arpita Chakraborty, Kirti Gupta, Winnie Yip\",\"doi\":\"10.2471/BLT.24.290519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine how a general inpatient satisfaction survey functions as a hospital performance measure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a mixed-methods pilot study of the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Health Providers and Systems survey in Odisha, India. We divided the study into three steps: cognitive testing of the survey, item testing with exploratory factor analysis and content validity indexing. Cognitive testing involved 50 participants discussing their interpretation of survey items. The survey was then administered to 507 inpatients across five public hospitals in Odisha, followed by exploratory factor analysis. Finally, we interviewed 15 individuals to evaluate the content validity of the survey items.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Cognitive testing revealed that six out of 18 survey questions were not consistently understood within the Odisha inpatient setting, highlighting issues around responsibilities for care. Exploratory factor analysis identified a six-factor structure explaining 66.7% of the variance. Regression models showed that interpersonal care from doctors and nurses had the strongest association with overall satisfaction. An assessment of differential item functioning revealed that patients with a socially marginalized caste reported higher disrespectful care, though this did not translate into differences in reported satisfaction. Content validity indexing suggested that discordance between experiences of disrespectful care and satisfaction ratings might be due to low patient expectations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using satisfaction ratings without nuanced approaches in value-based purchasing programmes may mask poor-quality interpersonal services, particularly for historically marginalized patients. Surveys should be designed to accurately capture true levels of dissatisfaction, ensuring that patient concerns are not hidden.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the World Health Organization\",\"volume\":\"102 7\",\"pages\":\"509-520\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11197647/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the World Health Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.24.290519\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the World Health Organization","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.24.290519","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要研究普通住院病人满意度调查如何发挥医院绩效衡量标准的作用:我们在印度奥迪沙邦开展了一项医院消费者对医疗机构和系统评估调查的混合方法试点研究。我们将研究分为三个步骤:调查认知测试、探索性因子分析项目测试和内容效度指标。认知测试包括 50 名参与者讨论他们对调查项目的解释。然后,我们对奥迪沙邦五家公立医院的 507 名住院病人进行了调查,随后进行了探索性因素分析。最后,我们对 15 人进行了访谈,以评估调查项目的内容有效性:认知测试表明,在 18 个调查问题中,有 6 个问题在奥迪沙的住院环境中没有得到一致的理解,这凸显了与护理责任有关的问题。探索性因素分析确定了一个六因素结构,可解释 66.7% 的方差。回归模型显示,医生和护士的人际关怀与总体满意度的关系最为密切。对差异项目功能的评估显示,社会边缘种姓的患者报告的不尊重护理程度较高,但这并没有转化为报告满意度的差异。内容效度指数表明,不尊重护理的经历与满意度评分之间的不一致可能是由于患者期望值过低造成的:结论:在基于价值的采购计划中,如果不采用细致入微的方法而使用满意度评分,可能会掩盖劣质的人际服务,尤其是对历史上被边缘化的患者而言。调查的设计应能准确捕捉真实的不满意度,确保患者的担忧不会被掩盖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient satisfaction and value based purchasing in hospitals, Odisha, India.

Objective: To examine how a general inpatient satisfaction survey functions as a hospital performance measure.

Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods pilot study of the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Health Providers and Systems survey in Odisha, India. We divided the study into three steps: cognitive testing of the survey, item testing with exploratory factor analysis and content validity indexing. Cognitive testing involved 50 participants discussing their interpretation of survey items. The survey was then administered to 507 inpatients across five public hospitals in Odisha, followed by exploratory factor analysis. Finally, we interviewed 15 individuals to evaluate the content validity of the survey items.

Findings: Cognitive testing revealed that six out of 18 survey questions were not consistently understood within the Odisha inpatient setting, highlighting issues around responsibilities for care. Exploratory factor analysis identified a six-factor structure explaining 66.7% of the variance. Regression models showed that interpersonal care from doctors and nurses had the strongest association with overall satisfaction. An assessment of differential item functioning revealed that patients with a socially marginalized caste reported higher disrespectful care, though this did not translate into differences in reported satisfaction. Content validity indexing suggested that discordance between experiences of disrespectful care and satisfaction ratings might be due to low patient expectations.

Conclusion: Using satisfaction ratings without nuanced approaches in value-based purchasing programmes may mask poor-quality interpersonal services, particularly for historically marginalized patients. Surveys should be designed to accurately capture true levels of dissatisfaction, ensuring that patient concerns are not hidden.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Bulletin of the World Health Organization 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
0.90%
发文量
317
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of the World Health Organization Journal Overview: Leading public health journal Peer-reviewed monthly journal Special focus on developing countries Global scope and authority Top public and environmental health journal Impact factor of 6.818 (2018), according to Web of Science ranking Audience: Essential reading for public health decision-makers and researchers Provides blend of research, well-informed opinion, and news
期刊最新文献
A health system assessment approach to analysis of political parties' health proposals, Portugal. Barriers to WHO prequalification of similar biotherapeutic insulin. Behaviour of motorcyclists and bicyclists before and after a road safety campaign, China. Inequalities in geographical access to emergency obstetric and newborn care. Legal changes and evidence on unmet need for contraception, Philippines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1