{"title":"增强安慰剂镇痛:揭示所有权和语言暗示的强大相互作用。","authors":"Victoria Wai Lan Yeung","doi":"10.1002/ejp.2303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Placebo analgesic research demonstrates pain reduction after <i>using</i> a placebo analgesic. Recent studies have documented that sometimes <i>possessing</i> a placebo analgesic induces placebo analgesia. These prior studies used a ‘cream’ as the stimulus and proposed that the effect is driven by an expectancy of obtaining benefits from the owned analgesic. This paper examines three pivotal components of placebo analgesia: placebo form, ownership and expectancy induced by verbal suggestion. We investigate analgesic expectancy between cream versus oil form of placebo stimulus and systematically isolate the effects of ownership, verbal suggestion and their interaction, comparing with the effect of use, to decipher the dynamics of placebo analgesia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 46) evaluated analgesic expectancy between cream and oil. Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 119) exposed participants to a placebo analgesic oil and randomized them into PU (possess and use), PA (possess and anticipate), P (possess-only) or A (anticipate-only) conditions. Pain outcomes were assessed using a cold pressor test. Comparing PA and P conditions assessed the verbal suggestion effect, comparing PA and A conditions evaluated the possession effect, while comparing PU and PA conditions shed light on the use effect.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In Study 1, participants showed comparable analgesic expectancy for cream and oil. In Study 2, both PA and PU groups performed equally well, reporting higher pain threshold, <i>F</i>(3, 115) = 5.14, <i>p</i> = 0.002, <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msubsup>\n <mi>η</mi>\n <mi>p</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msubsup>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> = 0.12; and a greater probability of persistent hand submersion than P and A groups, <i>X</i><sup>2</sup>(3) = 8.06, <i>p</i> = 0.045.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The findings highlight the significance of integrating possession with expectancy to induce placebo analgesia, which has clinical implications.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance</h3>\n \n <p>This study delves into the intricate dynamics of placebo analgesia, shedding light on the significant influence of ownership and verbal suggestion. Through a meticulous exploration of the relationship between ownership and expectancy induced by verbal suggestion, we propose novel avenues for enhancing placebo responses. This research has implications for clinical practice and pain management strategies, potentially revolutionizing approaches to pain relief and therapeutic outcomes. Our findings contribute to a paradigm shift in understanding placebo analgesia, emphasizing the pivotal interaction between ownership and verbal suggestion.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":"28 10","pages":"1701-1718"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejp.2303","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing placebo analgesia: Unravelling the powerful interplay of ownership and verbal suggestion\",\"authors\":\"Victoria Wai Lan Yeung\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejp.2303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Placebo analgesic research demonstrates pain reduction after <i>using</i> a placebo analgesic. Recent studies have documented that sometimes <i>possessing</i> a placebo analgesic induces placebo analgesia. These prior studies used a ‘cream’ as the stimulus and proposed that the effect is driven by an expectancy of obtaining benefits from the owned analgesic. This paper examines three pivotal components of placebo analgesia: placebo form, ownership and expectancy induced by verbal suggestion. We investigate analgesic expectancy between cream versus oil form of placebo stimulus and systematically isolate the effects of ownership, verbal suggestion and their interaction, comparing with the effect of use, to decipher the dynamics of placebo analgesia.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 46) evaluated analgesic expectancy between cream and oil. Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 119) exposed participants to a placebo analgesic oil and randomized them into PU (possess and use), PA (possess and anticipate), P (possess-only) or A (anticipate-only) conditions. Pain outcomes were assessed using a cold pressor test. Comparing PA and P conditions assessed the verbal suggestion effect, comparing PA and A conditions evaluated the possession effect, while comparing PU and PA conditions shed light on the use effect.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In Study 1, participants showed comparable analgesic expectancy for cream and oil. In Study 2, both PA and PU groups performed equally well, reporting higher pain threshold, <i>F</i>(3, 115) = 5.14, <i>p</i> = 0.002, <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msubsup>\\n <mi>η</mi>\\n <mi>p</mi>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msubsup>\\n </mrow>\\n </semantics></math> = 0.12; and a greater probability of persistent hand submersion than P and A groups, <i>X</i><sup>2</sup>(3) = 8.06, <i>p</i> = 0.045.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The findings highlight the significance of integrating possession with expectancy to induce placebo analgesia, which has clinical implications.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Significance</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study delves into the intricate dynamics of placebo analgesia, shedding light on the significant influence of ownership and verbal suggestion. Through a meticulous exploration of the relationship between ownership and expectancy induced by verbal suggestion, we propose novel avenues for enhancing placebo responses. This research has implications for clinical practice and pain management strategies, potentially revolutionizing approaches to pain relief and therapeutic outcomes. Our findings contribute to a paradigm shift in understanding placebo analgesia, emphasizing the pivotal interaction between ownership and verbal suggestion.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\"28 10\",\"pages\":\"1701-1718\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejp.2303\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.2303\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.2303","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:安慰剂镇痛研究表明,使用安慰剂镇痛后疼痛会减轻。最近的研究表明,有时使用安慰性镇痛剂会诱发安慰性镇痛。之前的这些研究使用 "药膏 "作为刺激物,并提出这种效应是由对从所拥有的镇痛剂中获益的预期所驱动的。本文研究了安慰剂镇痛的三个关键组成部分:安慰剂形式、所有权和由语言暗示引起的预期。我们研究了膏状与油状安慰剂刺激之间的镇痛预期,并系统地分离了所有权、语言暗示及其相互作用的影响,与使用的影响进行比较,以解读安慰剂镇痛的动态变化:研究 1(N = 46)评估了膏剂和油剂的镇痛预期。研究 2(N = 119)让参与者接触安慰剂镇痛油,并将他们随机分为 PU(拥有和使用)、PA(拥有和预期)、P(仅拥有)或 A(仅预期)条件。疼痛结果通过冷压试验进行评估。比较 PA 和 P 条件评估了语言暗示效应,比较 PA 和 A 条件评估了占有效应,而比较 PU 和 PA 条件则揭示了使用效应:结果:在研究 1 中,参与者对药膏和药油的镇痛期望值相当。在研究 2 中,PA 组和 PU 组表现同样出色,报告了更高的疼痛阈值,F(3, 115) = 5.14, p = 0.002, η p 2 $$ {eta\}_p^2 $$ = 0.12;与 P 组和 A 组相比,手部持续浸没的概率更大,X2(3) = 8.06, p = 0.045:结论:研究结果强调了结合占有和期望来诱导安慰剂镇痛的重要性,这具有临床意义:本研究深入探讨了安慰剂镇痛的复杂动态,揭示了所有权和语言暗示的重要影响。通过对所有权和语言暗示所引起的期望值之间关系的细致探索,我们提出了增强安慰剂反应的新途径。这项研究对临床实践和疼痛管理策略具有重要意义,有可能彻底改变缓解疼痛的方法和治疗效果。我们的研究结果有助于改变对安慰剂镇痛的理解模式,强调所有权和语言暗示之间的关键互动。
Enhancing placebo analgesia: Unravelling the powerful interplay of ownership and verbal suggestion
Background
Placebo analgesic research demonstrates pain reduction after using a placebo analgesic. Recent studies have documented that sometimes possessing a placebo analgesic induces placebo analgesia. These prior studies used a ‘cream’ as the stimulus and proposed that the effect is driven by an expectancy of obtaining benefits from the owned analgesic. This paper examines three pivotal components of placebo analgesia: placebo form, ownership and expectancy induced by verbal suggestion. We investigate analgesic expectancy between cream versus oil form of placebo stimulus and systematically isolate the effects of ownership, verbal suggestion and their interaction, comparing with the effect of use, to decipher the dynamics of placebo analgesia.
Methods
Study 1 (N = 46) evaluated analgesic expectancy between cream and oil. Study 2 (N = 119) exposed participants to a placebo analgesic oil and randomized them into PU (possess and use), PA (possess and anticipate), P (possess-only) or A (anticipate-only) conditions. Pain outcomes were assessed using a cold pressor test. Comparing PA and P conditions assessed the verbal suggestion effect, comparing PA and A conditions evaluated the possession effect, while comparing PU and PA conditions shed light on the use effect.
Results
In Study 1, participants showed comparable analgesic expectancy for cream and oil. In Study 2, both PA and PU groups performed equally well, reporting higher pain threshold, F(3, 115) = 5.14, p = 0.002, = 0.12; and a greater probability of persistent hand submersion than P and A groups, X2(3) = 8.06, p = 0.045.
Conclusion
The findings highlight the significance of integrating possession with expectancy to induce placebo analgesia, which has clinical implications.
Significance
This study delves into the intricate dynamics of placebo analgesia, shedding light on the significant influence of ownership and verbal suggestion. Through a meticulous exploration of the relationship between ownership and expectancy induced by verbal suggestion, we propose novel avenues for enhancing placebo responses. This research has implications for clinical practice and pain management strategies, potentially revolutionizing approaches to pain relief and therapeutic outcomes. Our findings contribute to a paradigm shift in understanding placebo analgesia, emphasizing the pivotal interaction between ownership and verbal suggestion.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Pain (EJP) publishes clinical and basic science research papers relevant to all aspects of pain and its management, including specialties such as anaesthesia, dentistry, neurology and neurosurgery, orthopaedics, palliative care, pharmacology, physiology, psychiatry, psychology and rehabilitation; socio-economic aspects of pain are also covered.
Regular sections in the journal are as follows:
• Editorials and Commentaries
• Position Papers and Guidelines
• Reviews
• Original Articles
• Letters
• Bookshelf
The journal particularly welcomes clinical trials, which are published on an occasional basis.
Research articles are published under the following subject headings:
• Neurobiology
• Neurology
• Experimental Pharmacology
• Clinical Pharmacology
• Psychology
• Behavioural Therapy
• Epidemiology
• Cancer Pain
• Acute Pain
• Clinical Trials.