内科住院医师在电子病历使用和住院负担方面的性别差异。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-08861-0
Savannah S Liddell, Alessandra G Tomasi, Andrew J Halvorsen, Brianna E Vaa Stelling, Emily L Leasure
{"title":"内科住院医师在电子病历使用和住院负担方面的性别差异。","authors":"Savannah S Liddell, Alessandra G Tomasi, Andrew J Halvorsen, Brianna E Vaa Stelling, Emily L Leasure","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-08861-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies have demonstrated patients hold different expectations for female physicians compared to male physicians, including higher expectations for patient-centered communication and addressing socioeconomic or emotional needs. Recent evidence indicates this gender disparity extends to the electronic health record (EHR). Similar studies have not been conducted with resident physicians.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study seeks to characterize differences in EHR workload for female resident physicians compared to male resident physicians.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study evaluated 12 months of 156 Mayo Clinic internal medicine residents' inbasket data from July 2020 to June 2021 using Epic's Signal and Physician Efficiency Profile (PEP) data. Excel, BlueSky Statistics, and SAS analytical software were used for analysis. Paired t-tests and analysis of variance were used to compare PEP data by gender and postgraduate year (PGY). \"Male\" and \"female\" were used in substitute for \"gender\" as is precedent in the literature.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Mayo Clinic internal medicine residents.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Total time spent in EHR per day; time in inbasket and notes per day; time in notes per appointment; number of patient advice requests made through the portal; message turnaround time.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Female residents received more patient advice requests per year (p = 0.004) with an average of 86.7 compared to 68, resulting in 34% more patient advice requests per day worked (p < 0.001). Female residents spent more time in inbasket per day (p = 0.002), in notes per day (p < 0.001), and in notes per appointment (p = 0.001). Resident panel comparisons revealed equivocal sizes with significantly more female patients on female (n = 55) vs male (n = 34) resident panels (p < 0.001). There was no difference in message turnaround time, total messages, or number of results received.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Female resident physicians experience significantly more patient-initiated messages and EHR workload despite equivalent number of results and panel size. Gender differences in inbasket burden may disproportionally impact the resident educational experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2904-2909"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576718/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender Disparities in Electronic Health Record Usage and Inbasket Burden for Internal Medicine Residents.\",\"authors\":\"Savannah S Liddell, Alessandra G Tomasi, Andrew J Halvorsen, Brianna E Vaa Stelling, Emily L Leasure\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11606-024-08861-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies have demonstrated patients hold different expectations for female physicians compared to male physicians, including higher expectations for patient-centered communication and addressing socioeconomic or emotional needs. Recent evidence indicates this gender disparity extends to the electronic health record (EHR). Similar studies have not been conducted with resident physicians.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study seeks to characterize differences in EHR workload for female resident physicians compared to male resident physicians.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study evaluated 12 months of 156 Mayo Clinic internal medicine residents' inbasket data from July 2020 to June 2021 using Epic's Signal and Physician Efficiency Profile (PEP) data. Excel, BlueSky Statistics, and SAS analytical software were used for analysis. Paired t-tests and analysis of variance were used to compare PEP data by gender and postgraduate year (PGY). \\\"Male\\\" and \\\"female\\\" were used in substitute for \\\"gender\\\" as is precedent in the literature.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Mayo Clinic internal medicine residents.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Total time spent in EHR per day; time in inbasket and notes per day; time in notes per appointment; number of patient advice requests made through the portal; message turnaround time.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Female residents received more patient advice requests per year (p = 0.004) with an average of 86.7 compared to 68, resulting in 34% more patient advice requests per day worked (p < 0.001). Female residents spent more time in inbasket per day (p = 0.002), in notes per day (p < 0.001), and in notes per appointment (p = 0.001). Resident panel comparisons revealed equivocal sizes with significantly more female patients on female (n = 55) vs male (n = 34) resident panels (p < 0.001). There was no difference in message turnaround time, total messages, or number of results received.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Female resident physicians experience significantly more patient-initiated messages and EHR workload despite equivalent number of results and panel size. Gender differences in inbasket burden may disproportionally impact the resident educational experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2904-2909\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576718/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-08861-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-08861-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:研究表明,与男医生相比,患者对女医生抱有不同的期望,包括对以患者为中心的沟通和满足社会经济或情感需求的期望更高。最近的证据表明,这种性别差异也延伸到了电子健康记录(EHR)中。目前尚未对住院医生进行类似的研究:本研究旨在描述女性住院医师与男性住院医师在电子病历工作量方面的差异:本研究使用 Epic 的信号和医生效率档案 (PEP) 数据,评估了 2020 年 7 月至 2021 年 6 月期间 156 名梅奥诊所内科住院医生的 12 个月篮内数据。使用 Excel、BlueSky Statistics 和 SAS 分析软件进行分析。使用配对 t 检验和方差分析来比较不同性别和研究生年级 (PGY) 的 PEP 数据。根据文献中的先例,用 "男性 "和 "女性 "代替 "性别":梅奥诊所内科住院医师:主要测量指标:每天在电子病历中花费的总时间;每天在inbasket和笔记中花费的时间;每次预约在笔记中花费的时间;通过门户网站提出的病人建议请求数量;信息周转时间:女住院医师每年收到更多的患者咨询请求(p = 0.004),平均为 86.7 个,而男住院医师为 68 个,导致每天工作的患者咨询请求增加了 34%(p尽管结果数量和小组规模相当,但女性住院医师收到的患者发起的信息和电子病历工作量明显更多。篮内负担的性别差异可能会对住院医师的教育体验造成不成比例的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gender Disparities in Electronic Health Record Usage and Inbasket Burden for Internal Medicine Residents.

Background: Studies have demonstrated patients hold different expectations for female physicians compared to male physicians, including higher expectations for patient-centered communication and addressing socioeconomic or emotional needs. Recent evidence indicates this gender disparity extends to the electronic health record (EHR). Similar studies have not been conducted with resident physicians.

Objective: This study seeks to characterize differences in EHR workload for female resident physicians compared to male resident physicians.

Design: This study evaluated 12 months of 156 Mayo Clinic internal medicine residents' inbasket data from July 2020 to June 2021 using Epic's Signal and Physician Efficiency Profile (PEP) data. Excel, BlueSky Statistics, and SAS analytical software were used for analysis. Paired t-tests and analysis of variance were used to compare PEP data by gender and postgraduate year (PGY). "Male" and "female" were used in substitute for "gender" as is precedent in the literature.

Subjects: Mayo Clinic internal medicine residents.

Main measures: Total time spent in EHR per day; time in inbasket and notes per day; time in notes per appointment; number of patient advice requests made through the portal; message turnaround time.

Key results: Female residents received more patient advice requests per year (p = 0.004) with an average of 86.7 compared to 68, resulting in 34% more patient advice requests per day worked (p < 0.001). Female residents spent more time in inbasket per day (p = 0.002), in notes per day (p < 0.001), and in notes per appointment (p = 0.001). Resident panel comparisons revealed equivocal sizes with significantly more female patients on female (n = 55) vs male (n = 34) resident panels (p < 0.001). There was no difference in message turnaround time, total messages, or number of results received.

Conclusions: Female resident physicians experience significantly more patient-initiated messages and EHR workload despite equivalent number of results and panel size. Gender differences in inbasket burden may disproportionally impact the resident educational experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Identifying Demographic Trends in the Use of Audio-Video and Audio-Only Telehealth by Arizona Medicaid Beneficiaries Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Private Equity Penetration in Behavioral Health in the United States, 2010-2022. Approach to Estimating Adherence to Heart Failure Medications Using Linked Electronic Health Record and Pharmacy Data. National Survey of Factors Associated with Physician Antibiotic Prescribing Preferences. Antipsychotics and Risk of Acute Respiratory Failure in U.S. Medicare Beneficiaries with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1