健康儿童和青少年视网膜和脉络膜光学相干断层血管造影指数的可重复性。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1111/opo.13357
Barsha Lal, David Alonso-Caneiro, Scott A Read, Andrew Carkeet
{"title":"健康儿童和青少年视网膜和脉络膜光学相干断层血管造影指数的可重复性。","authors":"Barsha Lal, David Alonso-Caneiro, Scott A Read, Andrew Carkeet","doi":"10.1111/opo.13357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the repeatability of retinal and choroidal optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) indices among healthy children and compare it to healthy young adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study captured 3 mm × 3 mm and 6 mm × 6 mm macular OCT-A scans including superficial and deep retinal layers, choriocapillaris and deep choroid over two visits, 1 week apart at approximately the same time of day, for 22 healthy adults (18-30 years) and 21 children (6-15 years). Magnification and projection-artefact corrected indices extracted using a custom image analysis program and individual biometry were compared between visits using Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation (ICC). Retinal indices included foveal avascular zone metrics, perfusion and vessel density and choroidal indices included choriocapillaris flow deficit metrics and deep choroid perfusion density, in the foveal, parafoveal and perifoveal regions. Repeatability between adults and children was compared with F-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bland-Altman analysis showed that the mean differences between repeated OCT-A indices were not significantly different from zero for either of the zones, layers and scan sizes in the two age groups (p > 0.05) except for foveal vessel density and foveal avascular zone perimeter (p = 0.04 for both) of 6-mm-deep retinal layer scans. The ICC ranged between 0.67 and 0.99. Significantly higher variability between visits (p < 0.05) in the indices was noted among adults than children, especially for choroidal indices of larger scan size.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The retinal and choroidal OCT-A indices in the foveal, parafoveal and perifoveal zones were repeatable in healthy children except for the foveal vessel density and foveal avascular zone perimeter of the 6-mm-deep retinal layer, which exhibited statistically borderline differences between visits. The adult group showed more variability between visits compared to children, especially in the larger scan size for choroidal OCT-A indices.</p>","PeriodicalId":19522,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repeatability of retinal and choroidal optical coherence tomography angiography indices in healthy children and young adults.\",\"authors\":\"Barsha Lal, David Alonso-Caneiro, Scott A Read, Andrew Carkeet\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/opo.13357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the repeatability of retinal and choroidal optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) indices among healthy children and compare it to healthy young adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study captured 3 mm × 3 mm and 6 mm × 6 mm macular OCT-A scans including superficial and deep retinal layers, choriocapillaris and deep choroid over two visits, 1 week apart at approximately the same time of day, for 22 healthy adults (18-30 years) and 21 children (6-15 years). Magnification and projection-artefact corrected indices extracted using a custom image analysis program and individual biometry were compared between visits using Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation (ICC). Retinal indices included foveal avascular zone metrics, perfusion and vessel density and choroidal indices included choriocapillaris flow deficit metrics and deep choroid perfusion density, in the foveal, parafoveal and perifoveal regions. Repeatability between adults and children was compared with F-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bland-Altman analysis showed that the mean differences between repeated OCT-A indices were not significantly different from zero for either of the zones, layers and scan sizes in the two age groups (p > 0.05) except for foveal vessel density and foveal avascular zone perimeter (p = 0.04 for both) of 6-mm-deep retinal layer scans. The ICC ranged between 0.67 and 0.99. Significantly higher variability between visits (p < 0.05) in the indices was noted among adults than children, especially for choroidal indices of larger scan size.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The retinal and choroidal OCT-A indices in the foveal, parafoveal and perifoveal zones were repeatable in healthy children except for the foveal vessel density and foveal avascular zone perimeter of the 6-mm-deep retinal layer, which exhibited statistically borderline differences between visits. The adult group showed more variability between visits compared to children, especially in the larger scan size for choroidal OCT-A indices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13357\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13357","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估健康儿童视网膜和脉络膜光学相干断层血管成像(OCT-A)指数的可重复性,并将其与健康年轻成人进行比较:这项前瞻性研究采集了 22 名健康成人(18-30 岁)和 21 名儿童(6-15 岁)的 3 mm × 3 mm 和 6 mm × 6 mm 黄斑 OCT-A 扫描图像,包括视网膜浅层和深层、脉络膜和脉络膜深层。使用定制的图像分析程序提取放大和投影图像误差校正指数,并使用布兰-阿尔特曼分析和类内相关性(ICC)比较各次检查的个体生物测量值。视网膜指数包括眼窝无血管区指标、灌注和血管密度,脉络膜指数包括眼窝、眼窝旁和眼窝周围区域的绒毛膜血流缺损指标和深脉络膜灌注密度。用 F 检验比较了成人和儿童之间的重复性:Bland-Altman分析表明,除了6毫米深视网膜层扫描的眼窝血管密度和眼窝无血管区周长(两者的P = 0.04)外,两个年龄组的重复OCT-A指数在区域、层和扫描尺寸上的平均差与零无显著差异(P > 0.05)。ICC 在 0.67 和 0.99 之间。各次检查之间的变异性显著较高(p 结论:视网膜和脉络膜视网膜扫描结果的ICC介于0.67和0.99之间:健康儿童眼窝、眼底旁和眼底周围的视网膜和脉络膜 OCT-A 指数具有可重复性,但 6 毫米深视网膜层的眼窝血管密度和眼窝无血管区周长除外,这两项指数在各次检查之间显示出统计学上的边缘性差异。与儿童相比,成人组在各次检查之间表现出更大的变异性,尤其是在扫描尺寸较大的脉络膜 OCT-A 指数方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Repeatability of retinal and choroidal optical coherence tomography angiography indices in healthy children and young adults.

Purpose: To evaluate the repeatability of retinal and choroidal optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) indices among healthy children and compare it to healthy young adults.

Methods: This prospective study captured 3 mm × 3 mm and 6 mm × 6 mm macular OCT-A scans including superficial and deep retinal layers, choriocapillaris and deep choroid over two visits, 1 week apart at approximately the same time of day, for 22 healthy adults (18-30 years) and 21 children (6-15 years). Magnification and projection-artefact corrected indices extracted using a custom image analysis program and individual biometry were compared between visits using Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation (ICC). Retinal indices included foveal avascular zone metrics, perfusion and vessel density and choroidal indices included choriocapillaris flow deficit metrics and deep choroid perfusion density, in the foveal, parafoveal and perifoveal regions. Repeatability between adults and children was compared with F-test.

Results: Bland-Altman analysis showed that the mean differences between repeated OCT-A indices were not significantly different from zero for either of the zones, layers and scan sizes in the two age groups (p > 0.05) except for foveal vessel density and foveal avascular zone perimeter (p = 0.04 for both) of 6-mm-deep retinal layer scans. The ICC ranged between 0.67 and 0.99. Significantly higher variability between visits (p < 0.05) in the indices was noted among adults than children, especially for choroidal indices of larger scan size.

Conclusion: The retinal and choroidal OCT-A indices in the foveal, parafoveal and perifoveal zones were repeatable in healthy children except for the foveal vessel density and foveal avascular zone perimeter of the 6-mm-deep retinal layer, which exhibited statistically borderline differences between visits. The adult group showed more variability between visits compared to children, especially in the larger scan size for choroidal OCT-A indices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.80%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, first published in 1925, is a leading international interdisciplinary journal that addresses basic and applied questions pertinent to contemporary research in vision science and optometry. OPO publishes original research papers, technical notes, reviews and letters and will interest researchers, educators and clinicians concerned with the development, use and restoration of vision.
期刊最新文献
Refractive development II: Modelling normal and myopic eye growth. What intrinsic factors affect the central corneal thickness? The effect of lens and fitting characteristics upon scleral lens centration. Recommended improvements to the statistical guidelines. Exploring the relationship between 24-2 visual field and widefield optical coherence tomography data across healthy, glaucoma suspect and glaucoma eyes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1