{"title":"利用同行评估评级指数，评估牙科监测与传统的透明矫治器治疗监测相比的效果。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.05.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Dental Monitoring (DM) (Dental Monitoring SAS, Paris, France) compared with conventional monitoring (CM) during active orthodontic treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index was used to evaluate the pretreatment and posttreatment records of 51 patients, with 26 in the CM group and 25 in the DM group. The change in weighted PAR was analyzed to assess the effectiveness of treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The chi-square test revealed that the CM group had a higher percentage of patients in the great improvement category compared with the DM group. However, this difference was not statistically significant (<em>P</em> = 0.192). A repeated measures general linear model demonstrated significant improvement over time (<em>P</em> <0.001), with no statistically significant group differences noted between CM and DM (<em>P</em> = 0.181) and no statistically significant time-by-group interaction (<em>P</em> = 0.299).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both CM and DM showed significant improvements in weighted PAR scores, but no statistically significant difference is present between the 2 groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":"166 4","pages":"Pages 350-355"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Dental Monitoring effectiveness compared with conventional monitoring of clear aligner therapy using the Peer Assessment Rating index\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.05.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Dental Monitoring (DM) (Dental Monitoring SAS, Paris, France) compared with conventional monitoring (CM) during active orthodontic treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index was used to evaluate the pretreatment and posttreatment records of 51 patients, with 26 in the CM group and 25 in the DM group. The change in weighted PAR was analyzed to assess the effectiveness of treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The chi-square test revealed that the CM group had a higher percentage of patients in the great improvement category compared with the DM group. However, this difference was not statistically significant (<em>P</em> = 0.192). A repeated measures general linear model demonstrated significant improvement over time (<em>P</em> <0.001), with no statistically significant group differences noted between CM and DM (<em>P</em> = 0.181) and no statistically significant time-by-group interaction (<em>P</em> = 0.299).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both CM and DM showed significant improvements in weighted PAR scores, but no statistically significant difference is present between the 2 groups.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics\",\"volume\":\"166 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 350-355\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889540624002221\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889540624002221","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating Dental Monitoring effectiveness compared with conventional monitoring of clear aligner therapy using the Peer Assessment Rating index
Introduction
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Dental Monitoring (DM) (Dental Monitoring SAS, Paris, France) compared with conventional monitoring (CM) during active orthodontic treatment.
Methods
The Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index was used to evaluate the pretreatment and posttreatment records of 51 patients, with 26 in the CM group and 25 in the DM group. The change in weighted PAR was analyzed to assess the effectiveness of treatment.
Results
The chi-square test revealed that the CM group had a higher percentage of patients in the great improvement category compared with the DM group. However, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.192). A repeated measures general linear model demonstrated significant improvement over time (P <0.001), with no statistically significant group differences noted between CM and DM (P = 0.181) and no statistically significant time-by-group interaction (P = 0.299).
Conclusions
Both CM and DM showed significant improvements in weighted PAR scores, but no statistically significant difference is present between the 2 groups.
期刊介绍：
Published for more than 100 years, the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics remains the leading orthodontic resource. It is the official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, the American Board of Orthodontics, and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Orthodontics. Each month its readers have access to original peer-reviewed articles that examine all phases of orthodontic treatment. Illustrated throughout, the publication includes tables, color photographs, and statistical data. Coverage includes successful diagnostic procedures, imaging techniques, bracket and archwire materials, extraction and impaction concerns, orthognathic surgery, TMJ disorders, removable appliances, and adult therapy.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
