新西兰卫生部关于 2023 年妊娠败血症调查和管理的立场声明。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1111/ajo.13848
Lucy Bowyer, Briony A Cutts, Helen L Barrett, Kendall Bein, Timothy M Crozier, Jessica Gehlert, Michelle L Giles, Jennifer Hocking, Sandra Lowe, Karin Lust, Angela Makris, Mark R Morton, Tara Pidgeon, Joanne Said, Helen L Tanner, Lucille Wilkinson, Maggie Wong
{"title":"新西兰卫生部关于 2023 年妊娠败血症调查和管理的立场声明。","authors":"Lucy Bowyer, Briony A Cutts, Helen L Barrett, Kendall Bein, Timothy M Crozier, Jessica Gehlert, Michelle L Giles, Jennifer Hocking, Sandra Lowe, Karin Lust, Angela Makris, Mark R Morton, Tara Pidgeon, Joanne Said, Helen L Tanner, Lucille Wilkinson, Maggie Wong","doi":"10.1111/ajo.13848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Society of Australia and New Zealand (SOMANZ) published its first sepsis in pregnancy and the postpartum period guideline in 2017 (Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 57, 2017, 540). In the intervening 6 years, maternal mortality from sepsis has remained static.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To update clinical practice with a review of the subsequent literature. In particular, to review the definition and screening tools for the diagnosis of sepsis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A multi-disciplinary group of clinicians with experience in all aspects of the care of pregnant women analysed the clinical evidence according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system following searches of Cochrane, Medline and EMBASE. Where there were conflicting views, the authors reviewed the topic and came to a consensus. All authors reviewed the final position statement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This position statement has abandoned the use of the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (qSOFA) score to diagnose sepsis due to its poor performance in clinical practice. Whilst New Zealand has a national maternity observation chart, in Australia maternity early warning system charts and vital sign cut-offs differ between states. Rapid recognition, early antimicrobials and involvement of senior staff remain essential factors to improving outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ongoing research is required to discover and validate tools to recognize and diagnose sepsis in pregnancy. Australia should follow New Zealand and have a single national maternity early warning system observation chart.</p>","PeriodicalId":55429,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SOMANZ position statement for the investigation and management of sepsis in pregnancy 2023.\",\"authors\":\"Lucy Bowyer, Briony A Cutts, Helen L Barrett, Kendall Bein, Timothy M Crozier, Jessica Gehlert, Michelle L Giles, Jennifer Hocking, Sandra Lowe, Karin Lust, Angela Makris, Mark R Morton, Tara Pidgeon, Joanne Said, Helen L Tanner, Lucille Wilkinson, Maggie Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajo.13848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Society of Australia and New Zealand (SOMANZ) published its first sepsis in pregnancy and the postpartum period guideline in 2017 (Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 57, 2017, 540). In the intervening 6 years, maternal mortality from sepsis has remained static.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To update clinical practice with a review of the subsequent literature. In particular, to review the definition and screening tools for the diagnosis of sepsis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A multi-disciplinary group of clinicians with experience in all aspects of the care of pregnant women analysed the clinical evidence according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system following searches of Cochrane, Medline and EMBASE. Where there were conflicting views, the authors reviewed the topic and came to a consensus. All authors reviewed the final position statement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This position statement has abandoned the use of the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (qSOFA) score to diagnose sepsis due to its poor performance in clinical practice. Whilst New Zealand has a national maternity observation chart, in Australia maternity early warning system charts and vital sign cut-offs differ between states. Rapid recognition, early antimicrobials and involvement of senior staff remain essential factors to improving outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ongoing research is required to discover and validate tools to recognize and diagnose sepsis in pregnancy. Australia should follow New Zealand and have a single national maternity early warning system observation chart.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13848\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13848","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:澳大利亚和新西兰协会(SOMANZ)于 2017 年发布了第一份妊娠期和产后败血症指南(Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 57, 2017, 540)。在这 6 年间,败血症导致的孕产妇死亡率一直保持不变。目的:通过回顾后续文献,更新临床实践。材料与方法:一个由具有孕妇护理各方面经验的多学科临床医生组成的小组,在对 Cochrane、Medline 和 EMBASE 进行检索后,根据 GRADE(建议评估、发展和评价分级)系统对临床证据进行了分析。对于存在冲突的观点,作者们对该主题进行了审查,并达成了共识。所有作者都审阅了最终的立场声明:由于快速器官功能衰竭评估评分(qSOFA)在临床实践中表现不佳,该立场声明放弃了使用该评分来诊断败血症。新西兰制定了全国孕产妇观察图表,而澳大利亚各州的孕产妇预警系统图表和生命体征临界值各不相同。快速识别、及早使用抗菌药物和高级员工的参与仍是改善预后的关键因素:结论:需要持续开展研究,以发现并验证识别和诊断妊娠期败血症的工具。澳大利亚应效仿新西兰,建立单一的全国孕产妇预警系统观察图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SOMANZ position statement for the investigation and management of sepsis in pregnancy 2023.

Background: The Society of Australia and New Zealand (SOMANZ) published its first sepsis in pregnancy and the postpartum period guideline in 2017 (Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 57, 2017, 540). In the intervening 6 years, maternal mortality from sepsis has remained static.

Aims: To update clinical practice with a review of the subsequent literature. In particular, to review the definition and screening tools for the diagnosis of sepsis.

Materials and methods: A multi-disciplinary group of clinicians with experience in all aspects of the care of pregnant women analysed the clinical evidence according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system following searches of Cochrane, Medline and EMBASE. Where there were conflicting views, the authors reviewed the topic and came to a consensus. All authors reviewed the final position statement.

Results: This position statement has abandoned the use of the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (qSOFA) score to diagnose sepsis due to its poor performance in clinical practice. Whilst New Zealand has a national maternity observation chart, in Australia maternity early warning system charts and vital sign cut-offs differ between states. Rapid recognition, early antimicrobials and involvement of senior staff remain essential factors to improving outcomes.

Conclusion: Ongoing research is required to discover and validate tools to recognize and diagnose sepsis in pregnancy. Australia should follow New Zealand and have a single national maternity early warning system observation chart.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
165
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ANZJOG) is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) and the RANZCOG Research foundation. ANZJOG aims to provide a medium for the publication of original contributions to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of obstetrics and gynaecology and related disciplines. Articles are peer reviewed by clinicians or researchers expert in the field of the submitted work. From time to time the journal will also publish printed abstracts from the RANZCOG Annual Scientific Meeting and meetings of relevant special interest groups, where the accepted abstracts have undergone the journals peer review acceptance process.
期刊最新文献
Long-term outcomes for women after dilator therapy with or without surgery in the creation of a neovagina. Management of detected syphilis in pregnancy adheres to guideline recommendations, but the crisis of congenital syphilis persists. An endometrial thickness of <12 mm does not exclude malignancy or pre-malignancy in cases of abnormal uterine bleeding: An observational study. Clinician compliance to intrapartum antibiotics prophylaxis for minimising neonatal group B streptococcal infection risk. 'Kind of scared but happy something was detected.' Cross-sectional survey of Let's Test for HPV participants to understand perspectives on an HPV detected result.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1