Tatiana Reichert Assunção de Matos, Ana Paula Gori Palka, Claudemir de Souza, Stenio Perdigão Fragoso, Daniela Parada Pavoni
{"title":"基于重组σB、σC和σNS全长蛋白和蛋白片段的酶联免疫吸附试验检测禽立克次体病毒(ARV)。","authors":"Tatiana Reichert Assunção de Matos, Ana Paula Gori Palka, Claudemir de Souza, Stenio Perdigão Fragoso, Daniela Parada Pavoni","doi":"10.1099/jmm.0.001836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Avian reovirus (ARV) is associated with arthritis/tenosynovitis and malabsorption syndrome in chickens. The σC and σB proteins, both exposed to the virus capsid, are highly immunogenic and could form the basis for diagnostic devices designed to assess the immunological status of the flock.<b>Gap Statement.</b> Commercial ARV ELISAs cannot distinguish between vaccinated and infected animals and might not detect circulating ARV strains.<b>Aim.</b> We aimed to develop a customized test to detect the circulating field ARV strains as well as distinguish between vaccinated and unvaccinated animals.<b>Methodology.</b> We developed ELISA assays based on recombinant (r) σB, σC and the nonstructural protein σNS and tested them using antisera of vaccinated and unvaccinated chickens as well as negative controls. Fragments of σB and σC proteins were also used to study regions that could be further exploited in diagnostic tests.<b>Results.</b> Vaccinated and unvaccinated birds were positive by commercial ELISA, with no difference in optical density values. In contrast, samples of unvaccinated animals showed lower absorbance in the rσB and rσC ELISA tests and higher absorbance in the rσNS ELISA test than the vaccinated animals. Negative control samples were negative in all tests. Fragmentation of σB and σC proteins showed that some regions can differentiate between vaccinated and unvaccinated animals. For example, σB amino acids 128-179 (σB-F4) and σC amino acids 121-165 (σC-F4) exhibited 85 and 95% positivity among samples of vaccinated animals but only 5% and zero positivity among samples of unvaccinated animals, respectively.<b>Conclusion.</b> These data suggest that unvaccinated birds might have been exposed to field strains of ARV. The reduction in absorbance in the recombinant tests possibly reflects an increased specificity of our test since unvaccinated samples showed less cross-reactivity with the vaccine proteins immobilized on ELISAs. The discrepant results obtained with the protein fragment tests between vaccinated and unvaccinated animals are discussed in light of the diversity between ARV strains.</p>","PeriodicalId":94093,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical microbiology","volume":"73 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of avian reovirus (ARV) by ELISA based on recombinant σB, σC and σNS full-length proteins and protein fragments.\",\"authors\":\"Tatiana Reichert Assunção de Matos, Ana Paula Gori Palka, Claudemir de Souza, Stenio Perdigão Fragoso, Daniela Parada Pavoni\",\"doi\":\"10.1099/jmm.0.001836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Avian reovirus (ARV) is associated with arthritis/tenosynovitis and malabsorption syndrome in chickens. The σC and σB proteins, both exposed to the virus capsid, are highly immunogenic and could form the basis for diagnostic devices designed to assess the immunological status of the flock.<b>Gap Statement.</b> Commercial ARV ELISAs cannot distinguish between vaccinated and infected animals and might not detect circulating ARV strains.<b>Aim.</b> We aimed to develop a customized test to detect the circulating field ARV strains as well as distinguish between vaccinated and unvaccinated animals.<b>Methodology.</b> We developed ELISA assays based on recombinant (r) σB, σC and the nonstructural protein σNS and tested them using antisera of vaccinated and unvaccinated chickens as well as negative controls. Fragments of σB and σC proteins were also used to study regions that could be further exploited in diagnostic tests.<b>Results.</b> Vaccinated and unvaccinated birds were positive by commercial ELISA, with no difference in optical density values. In contrast, samples of unvaccinated animals showed lower absorbance in the rσB and rσC ELISA tests and higher absorbance in the rσNS ELISA test than the vaccinated animals. Negative control samples were negative in all tests. Fragmentation of σB and σC proteins showed that some regions can differentiate between vaccinated and unvaccinated animals. For example, σB amino acids 128-179 (σB-F4) and σC amino acids 121-165 (σC-F4) exhibited 85 and 95% positivity among samples of vaccinated animals but only 5% and zero positivity among samples of unvaccinated animals, respectively.<b>Conclusion.</b> These data suggest that unvaccinated birds might have been exposed to field strains of ARV. The reduction in absorbance in the recombinant tests possibly reflects an increased specificity of our test since unvaccinated samples showed less cross-reactivity with the vaccine proteins immobilized on ELISAs. The discrepant results obtained with the protein fragment tests between vaccinated and unvaccinated animals are discussed in light of the diversity between ARV strains.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of medical microbiology\",\"volume\":\"73 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of medical microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001836\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言。禽再病毒(ARV)与鸡的关节炎/腱鞘炎和吸收不良综合征有关。σC和σB蛋白都暴露在病毒壳上,具有很强的免疫原性,可作为诊断设备的基础,用于评估鸡群的免疫状态。商用 ARV 酶联免疫吸附试验无法区分接种过疫苗的动物和受感染的动物,也可能无法检测到循环中的 ARV 株系。我们的目标是开发一种定制的检测方法,以检测野外循环的 ARV 株系,并区分已接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的动物。我们开发了基于重组 (r) σB、σC 和非结构蛋白 σNS 的 ELISA 检测方法,并使用接种疫苗和未接种疫苗鸡的抗血清以及阴性对照进行了测试。σB和σC蛋白的片段也被用来研究可进一步用于诊断测试的区域。通过商用酶联免疫吸附法检测,接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的禽类均呈阳性,光密度值无差异。相反,与接种疫苗的动物相比,未接种疫苗的动物样本在rσB和rσC ELISA测试中的吸光度较低,而在rσNS ELISA测试中的吸光度较高。阴性对照样品在所有测试中均为阴性。σB和σC蛋白的片段分析表明,某些区域可以区分接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的动物。例如,σB的128-179个氨基酸(σB-F4)和σC的121-165个氨基酸(σC-F4)在接种过疫苗的动物样本中的阳性率分别为85%和95%,而在未接种疫苗的动物样本中的阳性率仅为5%和0。这些数据表明,未接种疫苗的鸟类可能接触过野外的抗逆转录病毒菌株。由于未接种疫苗的样本与固定在酶联免疫吸附试验上的疫苗蛋白的交叉反应较少,因此重组试验中吸光度的降低可能反映了我们试验的特异性有所提高。接种过疫苗和未接种疫苗的动物在蛋白质片段检测中得到的结果不一致,这与 ARV 株系之间的多样性有关。
Detection of avian reovirus (ARV) by ELISA based on recombinant σB, σC and σNS full-length proteins and protein fragments.
Introduction. Avian reovirus (ARV) is associated with arthritis/tenosynovitis and malabsorption syndrome in chickens. The σC and σB proteins, both exposed to the virus capsid, are highly immunogenic and could form the basis for diagnostic devices designed to assess the immunological status of the flock.Gap Statement. Commercial ARV ELISAs cannot distinguish between vaccinated and infected animals and might not detect circulating ARV strains.Aim. We aimed to develop a customized test to detect the circulating field ARV strains as well as distinguish between vaccinated and unvaccinated animals.Methodology. We developed ELISA assays based on recombinant (r) σB, σC and the nonstructural protein σNS and tested them using antisera of vaccinated and unvaccinated chickens as well as negative controls. Fragments of σB and σC proteins were also used to study regions that could be further exploited in diagnostic tests.Results. Vaccinated and unvaccinated birds were positive by commercial ELISA, with no difference in optical density values. In contrast, samples of unvaccinated animals showed lower absorbance in the rσB and rσC ELISA tests and higher absorbance in the rσNS ELISA test than the vaccinated animals. Negative control samples were negative in all tests. Fragmentation of σB and σC proteins showed that some regions can differentiate between vaccinated and unvaccinated animals. For example, σB amino acids 128-179 (σB-F4) and σC amino acids 121-165 (σC-F4) exhibited 85 and 95% positivity among samples of vaccinated animals but only 5% and zero positivity among samples of unvaccinated animals, respectively.Conclusion. These data suggest that unvaccinated birds might have been exposed to field strains of ARV. The reduction in absorbance in the recombinant tests possibly reflects an increased specificity of our test since unvaccinated samples showed less cross-reactivity with the vaccine proteins immobilized on ELISAs. The discrepant results obtained with the protein fragment tests between vaccinated and unvaccinated animals are discussed in light of the diversity between ARV strains.