Li Sun , Gun Bernes , Mårten Hetta , Anders H. Gustafsson , Annika Höjer , Karin Hallin Saedén , Åse Lundh , Johan Dicksved
{"title":"瑞典北部奶牛场贮藏饲草和散装罐装牛奶中的微生物群--一项案例研究。","authors":"Li Sun , Gun Bernes , Mårten Hetta , Anders H. Gustafsson , Annika Höjer , Karin Hallin Saedén , Åse Lundh , Johan Dicksved","doi":"10.3168/jds.2024-24971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Factors contributing to variations in the quality and microbiota of ensiled forages and in bulk tank microbiota in milk from cows fed different forages were investigated. Nutritional quality, fermentation parameters and hygiene quality of forage samples and corresponding bulk tank milk samples collected in 3 periods from 18 commercial farms located in northern Sweden were compared. Principal coordinates analysis revealed that the microbiota in forage and bulk milk, analyzed using 16S rRNA gene-based amplicon sequencing, were significantly different. The genera <em>Lactobacillus</em>, <em>Weissella</em>, and <em>Leuconostoc</em> dominated in forage samples, whereas <em>Pseudomonas</em>, <em>Staphylococcus</em>, and <em>Streptococcus</em> dominated in bulk milk samples. Forage quality and forage-associated microbiota were affected by ensiling method and by use of silage additive. Forages stored in bunker and tower silos (confounded with use of additive) were associated with higher levels of acetic and lactic acid and <em>Lactobacillus</em>. Forage ensiled as bales (confounded with no use of additive) was associated with higher DM content, water-soluble carbohydrate content, pH, yeast count, and the genera <em>Weissella</em>, <em>Leuconostoc</em>, and <em>Enterococcus</em>. For bulk tank milk samples, milking system was identified as the major factor affecting the microbiota and type of forage preservation had little effect. Analysis of common amplicon sequence variants (ASV) suggested that forage was not the major source of <em>Lactobacillus</em> found in bulk tank milk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dairy Science","volume":"107 11","pages":"Pages 8961-8976"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The microbiota of ensiled forages and of bulk tank milk on dairy cattle farms in northern Sweden\",\"authors\":\"Li Sun , Gun Bernes , Mårten Hetta , Anders H. Gustafsson , Annika Höjer , Karin Hallin Saedén , Åse Lundh , Johan Dicksved\",\"doi\":\"10.3168/jds.2024-24971\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Factors contributing to variations in the quality and microbiota of ensiled forages and in bulk tank microbiota in milk from cows fed different forages were investigated. Nutritional quality, fermentation parameters and hygiene quality of forage samples and corresponding bulk tank milk samples collected in 3 periods from 18 commercial farms located in northern Sweden were compared. Principal coordinates analysis revealed that the microbiota in forage and bulk milk, analyzed using 16S rRNA gene-based amplicon sequencing, were significantly different. The genera <em>Lactobacillus</em>, <em>Weissella</em>, and <em>Leuconostoc</em> dominated in forage samples, whereas <em>Pseudomonas</em>, <em>Staphylococcus</em>, and <em>Streptococcus</em> dominated in bulk milk samples. Forage quality and forage-associated microbiota were affected by ensiling method and by use of silage additive. Forages stored in bunker and tower silos (confounded with use of additive) were associated with higher levels of acetic and lactic acid and <em>Lactobacillus</em>. Forage ensiled as bales (confounded with no use of additive) was associated with higher DM content, water-soluble carbohydrate content, pH, yeast count, and the genera <em>Weissella</em>, <em>Leuconostoc</em>, and <em>Enterococcus</em>. For bulk tank milk samples, milking system was identified as the major factor affecting the microbiota and type of forage preservation had little effect. Analysis of common amplicon sequence variants (ASV) suggested that forage was not the major source of <em>Lactobacillus</em> found in bulk tank milk.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dairy Science\",\"volume\":\"107 11\",\"pages\":\"Pages 8961-8976\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dairy Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030224009731\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dairy Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030224009731","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The microbiota of ensiled forages and of bulk tank milk on dairy cattle farms in northern Sweden
Factors contributing to variations in the quality and microbiota of ensiled forages and in bulk tank microbiota in milk from cows fed different forages were investigated. Nutritional quality, fermentation parameters and hygiene quality of forage samples and corresponding bulk tank milk samples collected in 3 periods from 18 commercial farms located in northern Sweden were compared. Principal coordinates analysis revealed that the microbiota in forage and bulk milk, analyzed using 16S rRNA gene-based amplicon sequencing, were significantly different. The genera Lactobacillus, Weissella, and Leuconostoc dominated in forage samples, whereas Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, and Streptococcus dominated in bulk milk samples. Forage quality and forage-associated microbiota were affected by ensiling method and by use of silage additive. Forages stored in bunker and tower silos (confounded with use of additive) were associated with higher levels of acetic and lactic acid and Lactobacillus. Forage ensiled as bales (confounded with no use of additive) was associated with higher DM content, water-soluble carbohydrate content, pH, yeast count, and the genera Weissella, Leuconostoc, and Enterococcus. For bulk tank milk samples, milking system was identified as the major factor affecting the microbiota and type of forage preservation had little effect. Analysis of common amplicon sequence variants (ASV) suggested that forage was not the major source of Lactobacillus found in bulk tank milk.
期刊介绍:
The official journal of the American Dairy Science Association®, Journal of Dairy Science® (JDS) is the leading peer-reviewed general dairy research journal in the world. JDS readers represent education, industry, and government agencies in more than 70 countries with interests in biochemistry, breeding, economics, engineering, environment, food science, genetics, microbiology, nutrition, pathology, physiology, processing, public health, quality assurance, and sanitation.