标准化伤口护理:修修补补的做法?

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Advances in wound care Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1089/wound.2024.0130
Chandan K Sen
{"title":"标准化伤口护理:修修补补的做法?","authors":"Chandan K Sen","doi":"10.1089/wound.2024.0130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Standardized care is crucial in health care for ensuring consistent, safe, high-quality, efficient, and evidence-based practices. Care pathways that standardize procedures promote adherence to best practices, reduce variability in treatment, and encourage collaboration among health care teams. This approach ultimately improves patient outcomes, enhances safety, and boosts the overall effectiveness of health care services. However, despite these benefits being widespread across most of the U.S. health care system, wound care stands out as an area where standards can vary significantly. The inconsistency in wound care standards in the United States can be traced to several factors. These include limited structured clinical wound care education, the discretion of health care providers in different business environments, differences in wound care settings, varying access to advanced treatments and technology, patient demographics and socioeconomic status, as well as differences in state laws and regional or institutional practices. Addressing these disparities requires a comprehensive approach that considers the complex interplay of the abovementioned factors. Active measures are needed to improve access, equity, and the quality of wound care services for all patients, regardless of where they live, their socioeconomic status, their health care coverage, or the business interests of providers and their institutions as well as of vendors marketing wound care products inconsistent with evidence-based practice. By understanding and actively addressing these factors, we can work toward achieving more standardized, evidence-based, and patient-centered practices in wound care across the nation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7413,"journal":{"name":"Advances in wound care","volume":" ","pages":"485-493"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standardized Wound Care: Patchwork Practices?\",\"authors\":\"Chandan K Sen\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/wound.2024.0130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Standardized care is crucial in health care for ensuring consistent, safe, high-quality, efficient, and evidence-based practices. Care pathways that standardize procedures promote adherence to best practices, reduce variability in treatment, and encourage collaboration among health care teams. This approach ultimately improves patient outcomes, enhances safety, and boosts the overall effectiveness of health care services. However, despite these benefits being widespread across most of the U.S. health care system, wound care stands out as an area where standards can vary significantly. The inconsistency in wound care standards in the United States can be traced to several factors. These include limited structured clinical wound care education, the discretion of health care providers in different business environments, differences in wound care settings, varying access to advanced treatments and technology, patient demographics and socioeconomic status, as well as differences in state laws and regional or institutional practices. Addressing these disparities requires a comprehensive approach that considers the complex interplay of the abovementioned factors. Active measures are needed to improve access, equity, and the quality of wound care services for all patients, regardless of where they live, their socioeconomic status, their health care coverage, or the business interests of providers and their institutions as well as of vendors marketing wound care products inconsistent with evidence-based practice. By understanding and actively addressing these factors, we can work toward achieving more standardized, evidence-based, and patient-centered practices in wound care across the nation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in wound care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"485-493\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in wound care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2024.0130\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2024.0130","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

标准化护理对医疗保健至关重要,可确保一致、安全、优质、高效和循证实践。程序标准化的护理路径可促进对最佳实践的坚持,减少治疗中的变异性,并鼓励医疗团队之间的协作。这种方法最终会改善患者的治疗效果,提高安全性,并提升医疗服务的整体效益。然而,尽管这些优点在美国大部分医疗保健系统中普遍存在,伤口护理仍是标准差异较大的一个领域。美国伤口护理标准的不统一受到多种因素的影响。这些因素包括有限的结构化临床教育、医疗服务提供者在遵循指南时的自由裁量权、伤口护理环境的差异、获得先进治疗和技术的机会不同、患者的人口统计和社会经济状况,以及各州法律和地区或机构实践的差异。要解决这些差异问题,需要采取综合方法,考虑上述因素的复杂相互作用。需要采取有针对性的干预措施,以改善所有患者的伤口护理服务的可及性、公平性和质量,无论其居住地、社会经济地位或医疗保险范围如何。通过了解并积极应对这些因素,我们可以努力在全国范围内实现更加标准化、循证和以患者为中心的伤口护理实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Standardized Wound Care: Patchwork Practices?

Standardized care is crucial in health care for ensuring consistent, safe, high-quality, efficient, and evidence-based practices. Care pathways that standardize procedures promote adherence to best practices, reduce variability in treatment, and encourage collaboration among health care teams. This approach ultimately improves patient outcomes, enhances safety, and boosts the overall effectiveness of health care services. However, despite these benefits being widespread across most of the U.S. health care system, wound care stands out as an area where standards can vary significantly. The inconsistency in wound care standards in the United States can be traced to several factors. These include limited structured clinical wound care education, the discretion of health care providers in different business environments, differences in wound care settings, varying access to advanced treatments and technology, patient demographics and socioeconomic status, as well as differences in state laws and regional or institutional practices. Addressing these disparities requires a comprehensive approach that considers the complex interplay of the abovementioned factors. Active measures are needed to improve access, equity, and the quality of wound care services for all patients, regardless of where they live, their socioeconomic status, their health care coverage, or the business interests of providers and their institutions as well as of vendors marketing wound care products inconsistent with evidence-based practice. By understanding and actively addressing these factors, we can work toward achieving more standardized, evidence-based, and patient-centered practices in wound care across the nation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in wound care
Advances in wound care Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
4.10%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Advances in Wound Care rapidly shares research from bench to bedside, with wound care applications for burns, major trauma, blast injuries, surgery, and diabetic ulcers. The Journal provides a critical, peer-reviewed forum for the field of tissue injury and repair, with an emphasis on acute and chronic wounds. Advances in Wound Care explores novel research approaches and practices to deliver the latest scientific discoveries and developments. Advances in Wound Care coverage includes: Skin bioengineering, Skin and tissue regeneration, Acute, chronic, and complex wounds, Dressings, Anti-scar strategies, Inflammation, Burns and healing, Biofilm, Oxygen and angiogenesis, Critical limb ischemia, Military wound care, New devices and technologies.
期刊最新文献
Alginate Formulation for Wound Healing Applications. Local Treatment of Wound Infections: A Review of Clinical Trials from 2013 to 2024. A Prospective Observational Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy for Complex Wounds: Influential Clinical Variables on Wound Healing Outcomes. Prediction of Healing Trajectory of Chronic Wounds Using a Machine Learning Approach. Topical Reconstituted High-Density Lipoproteins Elicit Anti-Inflammatory Effects in Diabetic Wounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1