{"title":"轮椅座椅系统对患有神经和神经肌肉疾病的儿童脊柱侧弯进展的影响:对定制轮椅座椅和模块化轮椅座椅的回顾性研究。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To retrospectively evaluate the comparative effect of 2 wheelchair seating systems, Custom-Contoured Wheelchair Seating (CCS) and Modular Wheelchair Seating (MWS), on scoliosis progression in children with neuromuscular and neurologic disorders and to determine any predictors for scoliosis progression.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Longitudinal, retrospective cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>A national health service regional posture and mobility service.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Nonambulant pediatric wheelchair users with neuromuscular and neurologic disorders (N=75; 36 men, 39 women; mean age at seating intervention, 10.50±3.97y) issued CCS and MWS by the South Wales Posture and Mobility Service from 2012-2022.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Two specialized wheelchair seating systems, CCS and MWS.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>A generalized least squares model was used to estimate the effect of seat type on Cobb angle over time.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 75 participants enrolled, 51% had cerebral palsy. Fifty were issued CCS and 25 were issued MWS. Baseline Cobb angle was 32.9±18.9° for the MWS group and 48.0±31.0° for the CCS group. The generalized least squares model demonstrated that time since seating intervention (χ<sup>2</sup>=122, <em>P</em><.0001), seating type (χ<sup>2</sup>=52.5, <em>P</em><.0001), and baseline scoliosis severity (χ<sup>2</sup>=41.6, <em>P</em><.0001) were predictive of scoliosis progression. Condition was not a strong predictor (χ<sup>2</sup>=9.96, <em>P</em> =.0069), and sex (χ<sup>2</sup>=5.67, <em>P</em>=.13) and age at intervention (χ<sup>2</sup>=4.47, <em>P</em>=.35) were not predictive. Estimated contrasts of medical condition with seat type over time demonstrated smaller differences between MWS and CCS over time. Predicted scoliosis velocity was found to attenuate with use of CCS over time compared with MWS, although scoliosis deteriorated regardless of intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings showed pediatric wheelchair users with neurologic and neuromuscular disorders prescribed CCS showed greater mitigation of scoliosis progression over time compared with those issued MWS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"105 10","pages":"Pages 1921-1929"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Wheelchair Seating Systems on Scoliosis Progression for Children With Neurologic and Neuromuscular Disorders: A Retrospective Study of Custom-Contoured Wheelchair Seating and Modular Wheelchair Seating\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.06.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To retrospectively evaluate the comparative effect of 2 wheelchair seating systems, Custom-Contoured Wheelchair Seating (CCS) and Modular Wheelchair Seating (MWS), on scoliosis progression in children with neuromuscular and neurologic disorders and to determine any predictors for scoliosis progression.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Longitudinal, retrospective cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>A national health service regional posture and mobility service.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Nonambulant pediatric wheelchair users with neuromuscular and neurologic disorders (N=75; 36 men, 39 women; mean age at seating intervention, 10.50±3.97y) issued CCS and MWS by the South Wales Posture and Mobility Service from 2012-2022.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Two specialized wheelchair seating systems, CCS and MWS.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>A generalized least squares model was used to estimate the effect of seat type on Cobb angle over time.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 75 participants enrolled, 51% had cerebral palsy. Fifty were issued CCS and 25 were issued MWS. Baseline Cobb angle was 32.9±18.9° for the MWS group and 48.0±31.0° for the CCS group. The generalized least squares model demonstrated that time since seating intervention (χ<sup>2</sup>=122, <em>P</em><.0001), seating type (χ<sup>2</sup>=52.5, <em>P</em><.0001), and baseline scoliosis severity (χ<sup>2</sup>=41.6, <em>P</em><.0001) were predictive of scoliosis progression. Condition was not a strong predictor (χ<sup>2</sup>=9.96, <em>P</em> =.0069), and sex (χ<sup>2</sup>=5.67, <em>P</em>=.13) and age at intervention (χ<sup>2</sup>=4.47, <em>P</em>=.35) were not predictive. Estimated contrasts of medical condition with seat type over time demonstrated smaller differences between MWS and CCS over time. Predicted scoliosis velocity was found to attenuate with use of CCS over time compared with MWS, although scoliosis deteriorated regardless of intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings showed pediatric wheelchair users with neurologic and neuromuscular disorders prescribed CCS showed greater mitigation of scoliosis progression over time compared with those issued MWS.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"105 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1921-1929\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999324010669\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999324010669","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of Wheelchair Seating Systems on Scoliosis Progression for Children With Neurologic and Neuromuscular Disorders: A Retrospective Study of Custom-Contoured Wheelchair Seating and Modular Wheelchair Seating
Objectives
To retrospectively evaluate the comparative effect of 2 wheelchair seating systems, Custom-Contoured Wheelchair Seating (CCS) and Modular Wheelchair Seating (MWS), on scoliosis progression in children with neuromuscular and neurologic disorders and to determine any predictors for scoliosis progression.
Design
Longitudinal, retrospective cohort study.
Setting
A national health service regional posture and mobility service.
Participants
Nonambulant pediatric wheelchair users with neuromuscular and neurologic disorders (N=75; 36 men, 39 women; mean age at seating intervention, 10.50±3.97y) issued CCS and MWS by the South Wales Posture and Mobility Service from 2012-2022.
Interventions
Two specialized wheelchair seating systems, CCS and MWS.
Main Outcome Measures
A generalized least squares model was used to estimate the effect of seat type on Cobb angle over time.
Results
Of the 75 participants enrolled, 51% had cerebral palsy. Fifty were issued CCS and 25 were issued MWS. Baseline Cobb angle was 32.9±18.9° for the MWS group and 48.0±31.0° for the CCS group. The generalized least squares model demonstrated that time since seating intervention (χ2=122, P<.0001), seating type (χ2=52.5, P<.0001), and baseline scoliosis severity (χ2=41.6, P<.0001) were predictive of scoliosis progression. Condition was not a strong predictor (χ2=9.96, P =.0069), and sex (χ2=5.67, P=.13) and age at intervention (χ2=4.47, P=.35) were not predictive. Estimated contrasts of medical condition with seat type over time demonstrated smaller differences between MWS and CCS over time. Predicted scoliosis velocity was found to attenuate with use of CCS over time compared with MWS, although scoliosis deteriorated regardless of intervention.
Conclusions
Our findings showed pediatric wheelchair users with neurologic and neuromuscular disorders prescribed CCS showed greater mitigation of scoliosis progression over time compared with those issued MWS.
期刊介绍:
The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities.
Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.