H L Sanjaya, B P Maharani, A P Baskara, Muhlisin, R Martien, Zuprizal
{"title":"病原菌脂多糖对肉鸡生产率的影响:一项荟萃分析。","authors":"H L Sanjaya, B P Maharani, A P Baskara, Muhlisin, R Martien, Zuprizal","doi":"10.1080/00071668.2024.2364331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>1. This meta-analysis investigated the impact of LPS and covariates (serotype, rearing period and administration route) on the productivity parameters of broiler chickens (average daily feed intake (ADFI), average daily gain (ADG) and feed conversion ratio (FCR)).2. Thirty-two eligible studies were included. Hedges' g effect size was determined using a random-effects model at 95% confidence interval.3. Results showed that LPS significantly decreased average daily feed intake (ADFI; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and average daily gain (ADG; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and increased FCR (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). The serotypes <i>Escherichia coli</i> 055: B5 (EC055: B5) and <i>Escherichia coli</i> 0127: B8 (EC 0127: B8) significantly reduced ADFI and ADG, and the serotype EC 055: B5 significantly increased the FCR (<i>p</i> < 0.05).4. The intraperitoneal administration of the LPS significantly reduced the productivity of broiler chickens (<i>p</i> < 0.05), but other administration routes did not show such effects. The reduction in ADFI and ADG was found in all rearing periods (<i>p</i> < 0.05), and the increase in FCR was observed in the starter (<i>p</i> = 0.0302) and grower periods (<i>p</i> = 0.0031).5. Exposure to LPS significantly reduced the productivity of broiler chickens (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, no relationship was observed between LPS dosage and productivity as indicated by the meta-regression study.6. The findings indicated that LPS has detrimental effects on broiler chickens' ADFI, ADG and FCR across various LPS serotypes and rearing periods. These detrimental impacts of LPS remain consistent regardless of the administered dosage.</p>","PeriodicalId":9322,"journal":{"name":"British Poultry Science","volume":" ","pages":"708-721"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of lipopolysaccharides from pathogenic bacteria on broiler chickens' productivity: a meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"H L Sanjaya, B P Maharani, A P Baskara, Muhlisin, R Martien, Zuprizal\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00071668.2024.2364331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>1. This meta-analysis investigated the impact of LPS and covariates (serotype, rearing period and administration route) on the productivity parameters of broiler chickens (average daily feed intake (ADFI), average daily gain (ADG) and feed conversion ratio (FCR)).2. Thirty-two eligible studies were included. Hedges' g effect size was determined using a random-effects model at 95% confidence interval.3. Results showed that LPS significantly decreased average daily feed intake (ADFI; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and average daily gain (ADG; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and increased FCR (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). The serotypes <i>Escherichia coli</i> 055: B5 (EC055: B5) and <i>Escherichia coli</i> 0127: B8 (EC 0127: B8) significantly reduced ADFI and ADG, and the serotype EC 055: B5 significantly increased the FCR (<i>p</i> < 0.05).4. The intraperitoneal administration of the LPS significantly reduced the productivity of broiler chickens (<i>p</i> < 0.05), but other administration routes did not show such effects. The reduction in ADFI and ADG was found in all rearing periods (<i>p</i> < 0.05), and the increase in FCR was observed in the starter (<i>p</i> = 0.0302) and grower periods (<i>p</i> = 0.0031).5. Exposure to LPS significantly reduced the productivity of broiler chickens (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, no relationship was observed between LPS dosage and productivity as indicated by the meta-regression study.6. The findings indicated that LPS has detrimental effects on broiler chickens' ADFI, ADG and FCR across various LPS serotypes and rearing periods. These detrimental impacts of LPS remain consistent regardless of the administered dosage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Poultry Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"708-721\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Poultry Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2024.2364331\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Poultry Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2024.2364331","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
1.这项荟萃分析调查了 LPS 及其协变量(血清型、饲养期和给药途径)对肉鸡生产性能参数(日均采食量(ADFI)、日均增重(ADG)和饲料转化率(FCR))的影响。采用随机效应模型,以 95% 的置信区间确定赫奇斯 g效应大小。结果表明,LPS 可显著降低平均日采食量(ADFI;p p p 大肠杆菌 055:B5(EC055:B5)和大肠杆菌 0127:B8(EC 0127:B8)可显著降低 ADFI 和 ADG,而血清型 EC 055:B5 可显著提高 FCR(p p p = 0.0302)和生长期(p = 0.0031)。
Effect of lipopolysaccharides from pathogenic bacteria on broiler chickens' productivity: a meta-analysis.
1. This meta-analysis investigated the impact of LPS and covariates (serotype, rearing period and administration route) on the productivity parameters of broiler chickens (average daily feed intake (ADFI), average daily gain (ADG) and feed conversion ratio (FCR)).2. Thirty-two eligible studies were included. Hedges' g effect size was determined using a random-effects model at 95% confidence interval.3. Results showed that LPS significantly decreased average daily feed intake (ADFI; p < 0.0001) and average daily gain (ADG; p < 0.0001) and increased FCR (p < 0.0001). The serotypes Escherichia coli 055: B5 (EC055: B5) and Escherichia coli 0127: B8 (EC 0127: B8) significantly reduced ADFI and ADG, and the serotype EC 055: B5 significantly increased the FCR (p < 0.05).4. The intraperitoneal administration of the LPS significantly reduced the productivity of broiler chickens (p < 0.05), but other administration routes did not show such effects. The reduction in ADFI and ADG was found in all rearing periods (p < 0.05), and the increase in FCR was observed in the starter (p = 0.0302) and grower periods (p = 0.0031).5. Exposure to LPS significantly reduced the productivity of broiler chickens (p < 0.05). However, no relationship was observed between LPS dosage and productivity as indicated by the meta-regression study.6. The findings indicated that LPS has detrimental effects on broiler chickens' ADFI, ADG and FCR across various LPS serotypes and rearing periods. These detrimental impacts of LPS remain consistent regardless of the administered dosage.
期刊介绍:
From its first volume in 1960, British Poultry Science has been a leading international journal for poultry scientists and advisers to the poultry industry throughout the world. Over 60% of the independently refereed papers published originate outside the UK. Most typically they report the results of biological studies with an experimental approach which either make an original contribution to fundamental science or are of obvious application to the industry. Subjects which are covered include: anatomy, embryology, biochemistry, biophysics, physiology, reproduction and genetics, behaviour, microbiology, endocrinology, nutrition, environmental science, food science, feeding stuffs and feeding, management and housing welfare, breeding, hatching, poultry meat and egg yields and quality.Papers that adopt a modelling approach or describe the scientific background to new equipment or apparatus directly relevant to the industry are also published. The journal also features rapid publication of Short Communications. Summaries of papers presented at the Spring Meeting of the UK Branch of the WPSA are published in British Poultry Abstracts .