Impact of Teprotumumab on Clinical Practice in Thyroid Eye Disease

Background

Following its Food and Drug Administration approval in January 2020, we examined the impact of teprotumumab on thyroid eye disease (TED) clinical practices.

Methods

Across 3 referral centers from January 1, 2018, to December 30, 2022, we retrospectively analyzed demographics, clinical features, treatment choices, and insurance status of patients with active, moderate to severe TED.

Results

Of 74 patients recommended for medical therapy, 53% received collaborative recommendations from endocrinologists and ophthalmologists in a TED clinic. Prior to teprotumumab availability, 19 patients were recommended medical therapy, and all received medical therapy (100%), which consists of corticosteroids (14, 73.7%) or tocilizumab (5, 26.3%). After teprotumumab became available, out of 55 patients that were recommended medical therapy, only 41 (74.6%) received medical therapy, mostly teprotumumab (33, 60%), followed by corticosteroids (5, 9.1%) or tocilizumab (3, 5.4%), while 14 (25.4%) did not receive medical therapy. Discordance between physicians’ recommendations and therapy received or lack thereof was explained by patients’ refusal (9, 64.3%), mostly due to side effect concerns (8, 88.9%), and insurance denial (5, 35.7%). Teprotumumab use was mostly associated with otic changes (10, 30.3%), weight loss (9, 27.3%), and hyperglycemia (6, 18.2%), but 2 (6.1%) patients developed serious infections. Corticosteroids were associated with insomnia (4, 21.1%), and 1 patient in the tocilizumab group had an infusion reaction requiring hospitalization.

Conclusion

Teprotumumab introduction increased TED therapy evaluations, yet not all received recommended treatment due to safety concerns or accessibility issues. Enhancing collaborative care, medication accessibility, and adverse effect management is crucial.