AKI 对重症监护病房 AECOPD 患者呼吸性酸中毒代谢补偿的影响。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of critical care Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154846
Florian Marcy MD , Katharina Goettfried , Philipp Enghard MD, PhD , Sophie K. Piper PhD , Julius Valentin Kunz MD , Tim Schroeder MD
{"title":"AKI 对重症监护病房 AECOPD 患者呼吸性酸中毒代谢补偿的影响。","authors":"Florian Marcy MD ,&nbsp;Katharina Goettfried ,&nbsp;Philipp Enghard MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Sophie K. Piper PhD ,&nbsp;Julius Valentin Kunz MD ,&nbsp;Tim Schroeder MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) can result in severe respiratory acidosis. Metabolic compensation is primarily achieved by renal retention of bicarbonate. The extent to which acute kidney injury (AKI) impairs the kidney's capacity to compensate for respiratory acidosis remains unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This retrospective analysis covers clinical data between January 2009 and December 2021 for 498 ICU patients with AECOPD and need for respiratory support.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>278 patients (55.8%) presented with or developed AKI. Patients with AKI exhibited higher 30-day-mortality rates (14.5% vs. 4.5% <em>p</em> = 0.001), longer duration of mechanical ventilation (median 90 h vs. 14 h; p = 0.001) and more severe hypercapnic acidosis (pH 7.23 vs. 7.28; pCO<sub>2</sub> 68.5 mmHg vs. 61.8 mmHg). Patients with higher AKI stages exhibited lower HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>/pCO<sub>2</sub> ratios and did not reach expected HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> levels. In a mixed model analysis with random intercept per patient we analyzed the association of pCO<sub>2</sub> (independent) and HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> (dependent variable). Lower estimates for averaged change in HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> were observed in patients with more severe AKI.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>AKI leads to poor outcomes and compromises metabolic compensation of respiratory acidosis in ICU patients with AECOPD. While buffering agents may aid compensation for severe AKI, their use should be approached with caution.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 154846"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944124003332/pdfft?md5=a8841a8e8611c65de8cd30e2a6074d0b&pid=1-s2.0-S0883944124003332-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of AKI on metabolic compensation for respiratory acidosis in ICU patients with AECOPD\",\"authors\":\"Florian Marcy MD ,&nbsp;Katharina Goettfried ,&nbsp;Philipp Enghard MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Sophie K. Piper PhD ,&nbsp;Julius Valentin Kunz MD ,&nbsp;Tim Schroeder MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154846\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) can result in severe respiratory acidosis. Metabolic compensation is primarily achieved by renal retention of bicarbonate. The extent to which acute kidney injury (AKI) impairs the kidney's capacity to compensate for respiratory acidosis remains unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This retrospective analysis covers clinical data between January 2009 and December 2021 for 498 ICU patients with AECOPD and need for respiratory support.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>278 patients (55.8%) presented with or developed AKI. Patients with AKI exhibited higher 30-day-mortality rates (14.5% vs. 4.5% <em>p</em> = 0.001), longer duration of mechanical ventilation (median 90 h vs. 14 h; p = 0.001) and more severe hypercapnic acidosis (pH 7.23 vs. 7.28; pCO<sub>2</sub> 68.5 mmHg vs. 61.8 mmHg). Patients with higher AKI stages exhibited lower HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>/pCO<sub>2</sub> ratios and did not reach expected HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> levels. In a mixed model analysis with random intercept per patient we analyzed the association of pCO<sub>2</sub> (independent) and HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> (dependent variable). Lower estimates for averaged change in HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> were observed in patients with more severe AKI.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>AKI leads to poor outcomes and compromises metabolic compensation of respiratory acidosis in ICU patients with AECOPD. While buffering agents may aid compensation for severe AKI, their use should be approached with caution.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of critical care\",\"volume\":\"83 \",\"pages\":\"Article 154846\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944124003332/pdfft?md5=a8841a8e8611c65de8cd30e2a6074d0b&pid=1-s2.0-S0883944124003332-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of critical care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944124003332\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944124003332","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(AECOPD)的急性加重可导致严重的呼吸性酸中毒。代谢补偿主要通过肾脏潴留碳酸氢盐来实现。急性肾损伤(AKI)对肾脏代偿呼吸性酸中毒能力的损害程度尚不清楚:结果:278 名患者(55.8%)出现或发展为 AKI。AKI 患者的 30 天死亡率更高(14.5% 对 4.5%,p = 0.001),机械通气时间更长(中位 90 小时对 14 小时;p = 0.001),高碳酸血症酸中毒更严重(pH 值 7.23 对 7.28;pCO2 68.5 mmHg 对 61.8 mmHg)。AKI 分期较高的患者表现出较低的 HCO3-/pCO2 比率,并且没有达到预期的 HCO3- 水平。在对每位患者进行随机截距的混合模型分析中,我们分析了 pCO2(自变量)和 HCO3-(因变量)之间的关系。在更严重的 AKI 患者中观察到较低的 HCO3- 平均变化估计值:结论:AKI 会导致不良预后,并影响 ICU AECOPD 患者呼吸性酸中毒的代谢补偿。虽然缓冲剂可能有助于补偿严重的 AKI,但应谨慎使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of AKI on metabolic compensation for respiratory acidosis in ICU patients with AECOPD

Purpose

Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) can result in severe respiratory acidosis. Metabolic compensation is primarily achieved by renal retention of bicarbonate. The extent to which acute kidney injury (AKI) impairs the kidney's capacity to compensate for respiratory acidosis remains unclear.

Materials and methods

This retrospective analysis covers clinical data between January 2009 and December 2021 for 498 ICU patients with AECOPD and need for respiratory support.

Results

278 patients (55.8%) presented with or developed AKI. Patients with AKI exhibited higher 30-day-mortality rates (14.5% vs. 4.5% p = 0.001), longer duration of mechanical ventilation (median 90 h vs. 14 h; p = 0.001) and more severe hypercapnic acidosis (pH 7.23 vs. 7.28; pCO2 68.5 mmHg vs. 61.8 mmHg). Patients with higher AKI stages exhibited lower HCO3/pCO2 ratios and did not reach expected HCO3 levels. In a mixed model analysis with random intercept per patient we analyzed the association of pCO2 (independent) and HCO3 (dependent variable). Lower estimates for averaged change in HCO3 were observed in patients with more severe AKI.

Conclusion

AKI leads to poor outcomes and compromises metabolic compensation of respiratory acidosis in ICU patients with AECOPD. While buffering agents may aid compensation for severe AKI, their use should be approached with caution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of critical care
Journal of critical care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.70%
发文量
237
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice. The Journal will include articles which discuss: All aspects of health services research in critical care System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients The team approach in the OR and ICU System-based research Medical ethics Technology in medicine Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education Residency Education.
期刊最新文献
Platelet dysfunction in heatstroke-induced coagulopathy: A retrospective observational study Challenges and opportunities in antibiotic allergy de-labeling in intensive care units: The time is now! Letter to the Editor: “Outcomes of continuous renal replacement therapy versus peritoneal dialysis as a renal replacement therapy modality in patients undergoing venoarterial 72 extracorporeal membrane oxygenation” Antibiotic allergy de-labeling in the intensive care unit: The prospective ADE-ICU study The interplay between organizational culture and burnout among ICU professionals: A cross-sectional multicenter study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1