评估选择性 CB2 大麻受体激动剂 Lenabasum 的滥用潜力。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1124/jpet.124.002129
Rachel Luba, Gabriela Madera, Rebecca Schusterman, Andrew Kolodziej, Ian Hodgson, Sandra D Comer
{"title":"评估选择性 CB2 大麻受体激动剂 Lenabasum 的滥用潜力。","authors":"Rachel Luba, Gabriela Madera, Rebecca Schusterman, Andrew Kolodziej, Ian Hodgson, Sandra D Comer","doi":"10.1124/jpet.124.002129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endocannabinoids, which are present throughout the central nervous system (CNS), can activate cannabinoid receptors 1 and 2 (CB1 and CB2). CB1 and CB2 agonists exhibit broad anti-inflammatory properties, suggesting their potential to treat inflammatory diseases. However, careful evaluation of abuse potential is necessary. This study evaluated the abuse potential of lenabasum, a selective CB2 receptor agonist in participants (<i>n</i> = 56) endorsing recreational cannabis use. Three doses of lenabasum (20, 60, and 120 mg) were compared with placebo and nabilone (3 and 6 mg). The primary endpoint was the peak effect (E<sub>max</sub>) on a bipolar Drug Liking visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary VAS and pharmacokinetic (PK) endpoints and adverse events were assessed. Lenabasum was safe and well tolerated. Compared with placebo, a 20-mg dose of lenabasum did not increase ratings of Drug Liking and had no distinguishable effect on other VAS endpoints. Dose-dependent increases in ratings of Drug Liking were observed with 60 and 120 mg lenabasum. Drug Liking and all other VAS outcomes were greatest for nabilone 3 mg and 6 mg, a medication currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). At a target therapeutic dose (20 mg), lenabasum did not elicit subjective ratings of Drug Liking. However, supratherapeutic doses of lenabasum (60 and 120 mg) did elicit subjective ratings of Drug Liking compared with placebo. Although both doses of lenabasum were associated with lower ratings of Drug Liking compared with 3 mg and 6 mg nabilone, lenabasum does have abuse potential and should be used cautiously in clinical settings. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This work provides evidence that in people with a history of recreational cannabis use, lenabasum was safe and well tolerated, although it did demonstrate abuse potential. This work supports further development of lenabasum for potential therapeutic indications.</p>","PeriodicalId":16798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11493446/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Abuse Potential of Lenabasum, a Selective Cannabinoid Receptor 2 Agonist.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Luba, Gabriela Madera, Rebecca Schusterman, Andrew Kolodziej, Ian Hodgson, Sandra D Comer\",\"doi\":\"10.1124/jpet.124.002129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Endocannabinoids, which are present throughout the central nervous system (CNS), can activate cannabinoid receptors 1 and 2 (CB1 and CB2). CB1 and CB2 agonists exhibit broad anti-inflammatory properties, suggesting their potential to treat inflammatory diseases. However, careful evaluation of abuse potential is necessary. This study evaluated the abuse potential of lenabasum, a selective CB2 receptor agonist in participants (<i>n</i> = 56) endorsing recreational cannabis use. Three doses of lenabasum (20, 60, and 120 mg) were compared with placebo and nabilone (3 and 6 mg). The primary endpoint was the peak effect (E<sub>max</sub>) on a bipolar Drug Liking visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary VAS and pharmacokinetic (PK) endpoints and adverse events were assessed. Lenabasum was safe and well tolerated. Compared with placebo, a 20-mg dose of lenabasum did not increase ratings of Drug Liking and had no distinguishable effect on other VAS endpoints. Dose-dependent increases in ratings of Drug Liking were observed with 60 and 120 mg lenabasum. Drug Liking and all other VAS outcomes were greatest for nabilone 3 mg and 6 mg, a medication currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). At a target therapeutic dose (20 mg), lenabasum did not elicit subjective ratings of Drug Liking. However, supratherapeutic doses of lenabasum (60 and 120 mg) did elicit subjective ratings of Drug Liking compared with placebo. Although both doses of lenabasum were associated with lower ratings of Drug Liking compared with 3 mg and 6 mg nabilone, lenabasum does have abuse potential and should be used cautiously in clinical settings. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This work provides evidence that in people with a history of recreational cannabis use, lenabasum was safe and well tolerated, although it did demonstrate abuse potential. This work supports further development of lenabasum for potential therapeutic indications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11493446/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.124.002129\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.124.002129","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:内源性大麻素存在于整个中枢神经系统(CNS),可激活 CB1 和 CB2 受体。CB1 和 CB2 激动剂具有广泛的抗炎特性,这表明它们具有治疗炎症性疾病的潜力。然而,有必要对其滥用潜力进行仔细评估。方法:本研究评估了来那巴苏姆的滥用潜力,这是一种选择性 CB2 受体激动剂,受试者(n=56)均赞同娱乐性使用大麻。来那巴苏姆的三种剂量(20 毫克、60 毫克和 120 毫克)与安慰剂和纳比隆(3 毫克和 6 毫克)进行了比较。主要终点是双相嗜药视觉模拟量表(VAS)的峰值效应(Emax)。还评估了次要 VAS 和药代动力学 (PK) 终点以及不良事件。结果来那巴苏姆安全且耐受性良好。与安慰剂相比,20毫克剂量的来那巴苏不会增加药物喜爱度,对其他VAS终点也没有明显影响。服用60毫克和120毫克来那巴苏后,药物喜爱度的增加呈剂量依赖性。3毫克和6毫克的纳比隆对药物喜爱度和所有其他VAS结果的影响最大,纳比隆是目前美国食品及药物管理局批准的药物。结论在目标治疗剂量(20 毫克)下,来那巴苏不会引起药物喜爱度的主观评价。然而,与安慰剂相比,超治疗剂量(60毫克和120毫克)的来那巴散确实能引起主观的 "喜欢药物 "评级。尽管与3毫克和6毫克纳比隆相比,这两种剂量的来那巴苏都会引起较低的 "喜欢吸毒 "评级,但这表明来那巴苏确实有滥用的可能,因此在临床上应谨慎使用。意义声明 这项研究提供的证据表明,来那巴苏对有大麻娱乐使用史的人安全且耐受性良好,尽管它确实有滥用的可能性。这项研究支持进一步开发来那巴苏姆的潜在治疗适应症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating the Abuse Potential of Lenabasum, a Selective Cannabinoid Receptor 2 Agonist.

Endocannabinoids, which are present throughout the central nervous system (CNS), can activate cannabinoid receptors 1 and 2 (CB1 and CB2). CB1 and CB2 agonists exhibit broad anti-inflammatory properties, suggesting their potential to treat inflammatory diseases. However, careful evaluation of abuse potential is necessary. This study evaluated the abuse potential of lenabasum, a selective CB2 receptor agonist in participants (n = 56) endorsing recreational cannabis use. Three doses of lenabasum (20, 60, and 120 mg) were compared with placebo and nabilone (3 and 6 mg). The primary endpoint was the peak effect (Emax) on a bipolar Drug Liking visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary VAS and pharmacokinetic (PK) endpoints and adverse events were assessed. Lenabasum was safe and well tolerated. Compared with placebo, a 20-mg dose of lenabasum did not increase ratings of Drug Liking and had no distinguishable effect on other VAS endpoints. Dose-dependent increases in ratings of Drug Liking were observed with 60 and 120 mg lenabasum. Drug Liking and all other VAS outcomes were greatest for nabilone 3 mg and 6 mg, a medication currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). At a target therapeutic dose (20 mg), lenabasum did not elicit subjective ratings of Drug Liking. However, supratherapeutic doses of lenabasum (60 and 120 mg) did elicit subjective ratings of Drug Liking compared with placebo. Although both doses of lenabasum were associated with lower ratings of Drug Liking compared with 3 mg and 6 mg nabilone, lenabasum does have abuse potential and should be used cautiously in clinical settings. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This work provides evidence that in people with a history of recreational cannabis use, lenabasum was safe and well tolerated, although it did demonstrate abuse potential. This work supports further development of lenabasum for potential therapeutic indications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: A leading research journal in the field of pharmacology published since 1909, JPET provides broad coverage of all aspects of the interactions of chemicals with biological systems, including autonomic, behavioral, cardiovascular, cellular, clinical, developmental, gastrointestinal, immuno-, neuro-, pulmonary, and renal pharmacology, as well as analgesics, drug abuse, metabolism and disposition, chemotherapy, and toxicology.
期刊最新文献
Preclinical Evaluation of MK-8189: A Novel Phosphodiesterase 10A Inhibitor for the Treatment of Schizophrenia. Molecular mechanisms underlying amyloid beta peptide mediated upregulation of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 in Alzheimer's disease. Clinical Development of the GluN2B-selective NMDA Receptor Inhibitor NP10679 for the Treatment of Neurologic Deficit after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. The Influence of the Estrous Cycle on Neuropeptide S Receptor-Mediated Behaviors. Dopamine D1-Like Receptor-Mediated Insurmountable Blockade of the Reinforcing Effects of Cocaine in Rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1