精神病诊断的第二意见:提供针对特定阶段的建议。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Psychiatric services Pub Date : 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.20230623
Carol Lim, Abigail L Donovan, Sophie Freudenreich, Corinne Cather, Sarah Maclaurin, Oliver Freudenreich
{"title":"精神病诊断的第二意见:提供针对特定阶段的建议。","authors":"Carol Lim, Abigail L Donovan, Sophie Freudenreich, Corinne Cather, Sarah Maclaurin, Oliver Freudenreich","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20230623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The impact of obtaining second-opinion consultations on diagnoses of schizophrenia spectrum disorders was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted for 177 patients referred to a psychosis consultation service at an academic medical center from January 1, 2017, to October 1, 2023; these consultations aimed to clarify a diagnosis of psychosis. Diagnoses made before and after consultations were compared, and treatment recommendations resulting from the consultation visit were summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among patients without a preconsultation diagnosis of schizophrenia, 28% (N=28 of 100) received a postconsultation diagnosis of schizophrenia. Among 62 patients with a postconsultation diagnosis of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), 56% (N=35) received this diagnosis only after consultation. Nearly all of these patients were advised to begin taking clozapine, and electroconvulsive therapy was less commonly recommended.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Expert consultation facilitates timely identification and optimal treatment of schizophrenia and its more severe subtype, TRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":20878,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Second Opinions for Diagnoses of Psychotic Disorders: Delivering Stage-Specific Recommendations.\",\"authors\":\"Carol Lim, Abigail L Donovan, Sophie Freudenreich, Corinne Cather, Sarah Maclaurin, Oliver Freudenreich\",\"doi\":\"10.1176/appi.ps.20230623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The impact of obtaining second-opinion consultations on diagnoses of schizophrenia spectrum disorders was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted for 177 patients referred to a psychosis consultation service at an academic medical center from January 1, 2017, to October 1, 2023; these consultations aimed to clarify a diagnosis of psychosis. Diagnoses made before and after consultations were compared, and treatment recommendations resulting from the consultation visit were summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among patients without a preconsultation diagnosis of schizophrenia, 28% (N=28 of 100) received a postconsultation diagnosis of schizophrenia. Among 62 patients with a postconsultation diagnosis of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), 56% (N=35) received this diagnosis only after consultation. Nearly all of these patients were advised to begin taking clozapine, and electroconvulsive therapy was less commonly recommended.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Expert consultation facilitates timely identification and optimal treatment of schizophrenia and its more severe subtype, TRS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatric services\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatric services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20230623\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric services","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20230623","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估第二意见咨询对精神分裂症谱系障碍诊断的影响:评估获得第二意见咨询对精神分裂症谱系障碍诊断的影响:对2017年1月1日至2023年10月1日期间转诊至某学术医疗中心精神病咨询服务的177名患者进行了回顾性病历审查;这些会诊旨在明确精神病的诊断。对会诊前后的诊断结果进行了比较,并总结了会诊后提出的治疗建议:在会诊前未确诊为精神分裂症的患者中,28%(100 人中有 28 人)在会诊后确诊为精神分裂症。在 62 名会诊后确诊为耐药精神分裂症(TRS)的患者中,56%(35 人)是在会诊后才确诊的。几乎所有这些患者都被建议开始服用氯氮平,而电休克疗法则较少被推荐:专家会诊有助于及时发现精神分裂症及其更严重的亚型 TRS,并对其进行最佳治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Second Opinions for Diagnoses of Psychotic Disorders: Delivering Stage-Specific Recommendations.

Objective: The impact of obtaining second-opinion consultations on diagnoses of schizophrenia spectrum disorders was evaluated.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted for 177 patients referred to a psychosis consultation service at an academic medical center from January 1, 2017, to October 1, 2023; these consultations aimed to clarify a diagnosis of psychosis. Diagnoses made before and after consultations were compared, and treatment recommendations resulting from the consultation visit were summarized.

Results: Among patients without a preconsultation diagnosis of schizophrenia, 28% (N=28 of 100) received a postconsultation diagnosis of schizophrenia. Among 62 patients with a postconsultation diagnosis of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), 56% (N=35) received this diagnosis only after consultation. Nearly all of these patients were advised to begin taking clozapine, and electroconvulsive therapy was less commonly recommended.

Conclusions: Expert consultation facilitates timely identification and optimal treatment of schizophrenia and its more severe subtype, TRS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatric services
Psychiatric services 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
295
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatric Services, established in 1950, is published monthly by the American Psychiatric Association. The peer-reviewed journal features research reports on issues related to the delivery of mental health services, especially for people with serious mental illness in community-based treatment programs. Long known as an interdisciplinary journal, Psychiatric Services recognizes that provision of high-quality care involves collaboration among a variety of professionals, frequently working as a team. Authors of research reports published in the journal include psychiatrists, psychologists, pharmacists, nurses, social workers, drug and alcohol treatment counselors, economists, policy analysts, and professionals in related systems such as criminal justice and welfare systems. In the mental health field, the current focus on patient-centered, recovery-oriented care and on dissemination of evidence-based practices is transforming service delivery systems at all levels. Research published in Psychiatric Services contributes to this transformation.
期刊最新文献
A Lived Experience Perspective in Suicide Prevention Research. State Policy Strategies for the Workforce Emergency in Behavioral Health. Employment Experiences and Employability of People in China Living With Schizophrenia: A Qualitative Study. Recovery Coach Program Implementation Across an Integrated Health System. Influenza and COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Among Individuals With Versus Without Diagnosed Psychiatric Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1