Kristin Öster, Philip Tucker, Marie Söderström, Anna Dahlgren
{"title":"快速回报、睡眠、嗜睡和压力--对客观睡眠和日记数据的个体内部实地研究。","authors":"Kristin Öster, Philip Tucker, Marie Söderström, Anna Dahlgren","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Quick returns (<11 hours of rest between shifts) have been associated with shortened sleep length and increased sleepiness, but previous efforts have failed to find effects on sleep quality or stress. A shortcoming of most previous research has been the reliance on subjective measures of sleep. The aim of this study was to combine diary and actigraphy data to investigate intra-individual differences in sleep length, sleep quality, sleepiness, and stress during quick returns compared to day-day transitions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of 225 nurses and assistant nurses who wore actigraphy wristbands and kept a diary of work and sleep for seven days, a subsample of 90 individuals with one observation of both a quick return and a control condition (day-day transition) was extracted. Sleep quality was assessed with actigraphy data on sleep fragmentation and subjective ratings of perceived sleep quality. Stress and sleepiness levels were rated every third hour throughout the day. Shifts were identified from self-reported working hours. Data was analyzed in multilevel models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quick returns were associated with 1 hour shorter sleep length [95% confidence interval (CI) -1.23- -0.81], reduced subjective sleep quality (-0.49, 95% CI -0.69- -0.31), increased anxiety at bedtime (-0.38, 95% CI -0.69- -0.08) and increased worktime sleepiness (0.45, 95%CI 0.22- 0.71), compared to day-day transitions. Sleep fragmentation and stress ratings did not differ between conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of impaired sleep and increased sleepiness highlight the need for caution when scheduling shift combinations with quick returns.</p>","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":"466-474"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11393759/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quick returns, sleep, sleepiness and stress - An intra-individual field study on objective sleep and diary data.\",\"authors\":\"Kristin Öster, Philip Tucker, Marie Söderström, Anna Dahlgren\",\"doi\":\"10.5271/sjweh.4175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Quick returns (<11 hours of rest between shifts) have been associated with shortened sleep length and increased sleepiness, but previous efforts have failed to find effects on sleep quality or stress. A shortcoming of most previous research has been the reliance on subjective measures of sleep. The aim of this study was to combine diary and actigraphy data to investigate intra-individual differences in sleep length, sleep quality, sleepiness, and stress during quick returns compared to day-day transitions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of 225 nurses and assistant nurses who wore actigraphy wristbands and kept a diary of work and sleep for seven days, a subsample of 90 individuals with one observation of both a quick return and a control condition (day-day transition) was extracted. Sleep quality was assessed with actigraphy data on sleep fragmentation and subjective ratings of perceived sleep quality. Stress and sleepiness levels were rated every third hour throughout the day. Shifts were identified from self-reported working hours. Data was analyzed in multilevel models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quick returns were associated with 1 hour shorter sleep length [95% confidence interval (CI) -1.23- -0.81], reduced subjective sleep quality (-0.49, 95% CI -0.69- -0.31), increased anxiety at bedtime (-0.38, 95% CI -0.69- -0.08) and increased worktime sleepiness (0.45, 95%CI 0.22- 0.71), compared to day-day transitions. Sleep fragmentation and stress ratings did not differ between conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of impaired sleep and increased sleepiness highlight the need for caution when scheduling shift combinations with quick returns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"466-474\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11393759/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4175\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4175","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目标:快速返回(方法:在 225 名佩戴动图腕带并记录 7 天工作和睡眠日记的护士和助理护士中,抽取了 90 人作为子样本,对快速返回和对照条件(日-日转换)进行了一次观察。睡眠质量的评估采用了关于睡眠片段的动图数据和对感知睡眠质量的主观评分。全天每隔三小时对压力和嗜睡程度进行评分。根据自我报告的工作时间确定轮班。数据通过多层次模型进行分析:与白班相比,快班导致睡眠时间缩短 1 小时[95% 置信区间 (CI)-1.23--0.81],主观睡眠质量下降(-0.49,95% CI -0.69--0.31),睡前焦虑增加(-0.38,95% CI -0.69--0.08),工作时间嗜睡增加(0.45,95%CI 0.22-0.71)。不同条件下的睡眠片段和压力评分没有差异:睡眠受损和嗜睡增加的研究结果突出表明,在安排快速返回的轮班组合时需要谨慎。
Quick returns, sleep, sleepiness and stress - An intra-individual field study on objective sleep and diary data.
Objectives: Quick returns (<11 hours of rest between shifts) have been associated with shortened sleep length and increased sleepiness, but previous efforts have failed to find effects on sleep quality or stress. A shortcoming of most previous research has been the reliance on subjective measures of sleep. The aim of this study was to combine diary and actigraphy data to investigate intra-individual differences in sleep length, sleep quality, sleepiness, and stress during quick returns compared to day-day transitions.
Methods: Of 225 nurses and assistant nurses who wore actigraphy wristbands and kept a diary of work and sleep for seven days, a subsample of 90 individuals with one observation of both a quick return and a control condition (day-day transition) was extracted. Sleep quality was assessed with actigraphy data on sleep fragmentation and subjective ratings of perceived sleep quality. Stress and sleepiness levels were rated every third hour throughout the day. Shifts were identified from self-reported working hours. Data was analyzed in multilevel models.
Results: Quick returns were associated with 1 hour shorter sleep length [95% confidence interval (CI) -1.23- -0.81], reduced subjective sleep quality (-0.49, 95% CI -0.69- -0.31), increased anxiety at bedtime (-0.38, 95% CI -0.69- -0.08) and increased worktime sleepiness (0.45, 95%CI 0.22- 0.71), compared to day-day transitions. Sleep fragmentation and stress ratings did not differ between conditions.
Conclusions: The findings of impaired sleep and increased sleepiness highlight the need for caution when scheduling shift combinations with quick returns.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the Journal is to promote research in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety and to increase knowledge through the publication of original research articles, systematic reviews, and other information of high interest. Areas of interest include occupational and environmental epidemiology, occupational and environmental medicine, psychosocial factors at work, physical work load, physical activity work-related mental and musculoskeletal problems, aging, work ability and return to work, working hours and health, occupational hygiene and toxicology, work safety and injury epidemiology as well as occupational health services. In addition to observational studies, quasi-experimental and intervention studies are welcome as well as methodological papers, occupational cohort profiles, and studies associated with economic evaluation. The Journal also publishes short communications, case reports, commentaries, discussion papers, clinical questions, consensus reports, meeting reports, other reports, book reviews, news, and announcements (jobs, courses, events etc).