WATCHMAN™ 和 Amplatzer™ 心塞/Amplatzer™ Amulet™ 装置用于非瓣膜性心房颤动左心房阑尾封闭的比较概况:全面系统回顾和元分析》。

Q3 Medicine Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management Pub Date : 2024-06-15 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.19102/icrm.2024.15061
Fnu Raja, Khimya Rani, Sunny Kumar, Fnu Someshwar, Muhammad Ahsan Naseer Khan, Fnu Abubakar, Dhvani Bhatt, Deepak Jung Subedi, Sujeet Shadmani, Fatima Tuz Zahra Abdullah
{"title":"WATCHMAN™ 和 Amplatzer™ 心塞/Amplatzer™ Amulet™ 装置用于非瓣膜性心房颤动左心房阑尾封闭的比较概况:全面系统回顾和元分析》。","authors":"Fnu Raja, Khimya Rani, Sunny Kumar, Fnu Someshwar, Muhammad Ahsan Naseer Khan, Fnu Abubakar, Dhvani Bhatt, Deepak Jung Subedi, Sujeet Shadmani, Fatima Tuz Zahra Abdullah","doi":"10.19102/icrm.2024.15061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent cardiac arrhythmia marked by irregular and frequent tachycardic rhythms in the atria, affecting 1%-2% of the general population. The WATCHMAN™ device from Boston Scientific (Marlborough, MA, USA) and the Amplatzer™ Amulet™ device from Abbott (Chicago, IL, USA) are two devices used globally for left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in non-valvular AF. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Elsevier's ScienceDirect literature databases to identify studies comparing the WATCHMAN™ procedure with Amulet™ device implantation for LAAC in patients with AF. The analyses were conducted using the random-effects model. A total of 20 studies were identified, with 18 falling into the category of observational studies and 2 being randomized controlled trials. A total of 6310 participants were included in this meta-analysis, with 3198 individuals (50.68%) assigned to the WATCHMAN™ procedure group and 3112 individuals (49.32%) allocated to the Amplatzer™ Cardiac Plug (ACP) group. The analysis revealed a higher risk of stroke associated with the WATCHMAN™ technique (relative risk [RR], 1.14), albeit without statistical significance. Conversely, the WATCHMAN™ approach led to a significantly lower risk of cardiac death (RR, 0.44; <i>P</i> = .04). Notably, the risks of all-cause mortality (RR, 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-1.08; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%; <i>P</i> = .25) and major bleeding (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.65-1.33; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 31%; <i>P</i> = .70) were clinically reduced with the WATCHMAN™ procedure, although statistical significance was not achieved. Compared to Amulet™ device implantation, WATCHMAN™ device implantation decreased the risk of cardiac mortality, while the risks of stroke, systemic embolism, all-cause mortality, and major bleeding were not statistically significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":36299,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management","volume":"15 6","pages":"5917-5929"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11210678/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Profiles of the WATCHMAN™ and Amplatzer™ Cardiac Plug/Amplatzer™ Amulet™ Devices for Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Fnu Raja, Khimya Rani, Sunny Kumar, Fnu Someshwar, Muhammad Ahsan Naseer Khan, Fnu Abubakar, Dhvani Bhatt, Deepak Jung Subedi, Sujeet Shadmani, Fatima Tuz Zahra Abdullah\",\"doi\":\"10.19102/icrm.2024.15061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent cardiac arrhythmia marked by irregular and frequent tachycardic rhythms in the atria, affecting 1%-2% of the general population. The WATCHMAN™ device from Boston Scientific (Marlborough, MA, USA) and the Amplatzer™ Amulet™ device from Abbott (Chicago, IL, USA) are two devices used globally for left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in non-valvular AF. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Elsevier's ScienceDirect literature databases to identify studies comparing the WATCHMAN™ procedure with Amulet™ device implantation for LAAC in patients with AF. The analyses were conducted using the random-effects model. A total of 20 studies were identified, with 18 falling into the category of observational studies and 2 being randomized controlled trials. A total of 6310 participants were included in this meta-analysis, with 3198 individuals (50.68%) assigned to the WATCHMAN™ procedure group and 3112 individuals (49.32%) allocated to the Amplatzer™ Cardiac Plug (ACP) group. The analysis revealed a higher risk of stroke associated with the WATCHMAN™ technique (relative risk [RR], 1.14), albeit without statistical significance. Conversely, the WATCHMAN™ approach led to a significantly lower risk of cardiac death (RR, 0.44; <i>P</i> = .04). Notably, the risks of all-cause mortality (RR, 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-1.08; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%; <i>P</i> = .25) and major bleeding (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.65-1.33; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 31%; <i>P</i> = .70) were clinically reduced with the WATCHMAN™ procedure, although statistical significance was not achieved. Compared to Amulet™ device implantation, WATCHMAN™ device implantation decreased the risk of cardiac mortality, while the risks of stroke, systemic embolism, all-cause mortality, and major bleeding were not statistically significant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management\",\"volume\":\"15 6\",\"pages\":\"5917-5929\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11210678/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2024.15061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2024.15061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心房颤动(房颤)是一种常见的心律失常,其特征是心房出现不规则和频繁的心动过速节律,发病率占总人口的 1%-2%。波士顿科学公司(美国马萨诸塞州马尔堡市)的 WATCHMAN™ 装置和雅培公司(美国伊利诺斯州芝加哥市)的 Amplatzer™ Amulet™ 装置是全球用于非瓣膜性房颤的左心房阑尾关闭术 (LAAC) 的两种装置。我们在 PubMed、Cochrane Library 和 Elsevier's ScienceDirect 文献数据库中进行了系统性检索,以确定在房颤患者中比较 WATCHMAN™ 手术和 Amulet™ 装置植入术用于 LAAC 的研究。分析采用随机效应模型进行。共确定了 20 项研究,其中 18 项属于观察性研究,2 项属于随机对照试验。本次荟萃分析共纳入 6310 名参与者,其中 3198 人(50.68%)被分配到 WATCHMAN™ 手术组,3112 人(49.32%)被分配到 Amplatzer™ 心脏置管术 (ACP) 组。分析表明,WATCHMAN™ 技术的中风风险较高(相对风险 [RR],1.14),但无统计学意义。相反,WATCHMAN™ 方法导致心脏死亡的风险明显降低(RR,0.44;P = .04)。值得注意的是,WATCHMAN™ 手术降低了全因死亡风险(RR,0.89;95% 置信区间[CI],0.73-1.08;I 2 = 0%;P = .25)和大出血风险(RR,0.93;95% 置信区间[CI],0.65-1.33;I 2 = 31%;P = .70),尽管没有统计学意义。与 Amulet™ 装置植入术相比,WATCHMAN™ 装置植入术降低了心脏死亡风险,而中风、全身性栓塞、全因死亡和大出血的风险没有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Profiles of the WATCHMAN™ and Amplatzer™ Cardiac Plug/Amplatzer™ Amulet™ Devices for Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent cardiac arrhythmia marked by irregular and frequent tachycardic rhythms in the atria, affecting 1%-2% of the general population. The WATCHMAN™ device from Boston Scientific (Marlborough, MA, USA) and the Amplatzer™ Amulet™ device from Abbott (Chicago, IL, USA) are two devices used globally for left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in non-valvular AF. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Elsevier's ScienceDirect literature databases to identify studies comparing the WATCHMAN™ procedure with Amulet™ device implantation for LAAC in patients with AF. The analyses were conducted using the random-effects model. A total of 20 studies were identified, with 18 falling into the category of observational studies and 2 being randomized controlled trials. A total of 6310 participants were included in this meta-analysis, with 3198 individuals (50.68%) assigned to the WATCHMAN™ procedure group and 3112 individuals (49.32%) allocated to the Amplatzer™ Cardiac Plug (ACP) group. The analysis revealed a higher risk of stroke associated with the WATCHMAN™ technique (relative risk [RR], 1.14), albeit without statistical significance. Conversely, the WATCHMAN™ approach led to a significantly lower risk of cardiac death (RR, 0.44; P = .04). Notably, the risks of all-cause mortality (RR, 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-1.08; I 2 = 0%; P = .25) and major bleeding (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.65-1.33; I 2 = 31%; P = .70) were clinically reduced with the WATCHMAN™ procedure, although statistical significance was not achieved. Compared to Amulet™ device implantation, WATCHMAN™ device implantation decreased the risk of cardiac mortality, while the risks of stroke, systemic embolism, all-cause mortality, and major bleeding were not statistically significant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management
Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊最新文献
Right Ventricular Implantation of an Aveir™ AR Device for Bradycardia in a 90-Year-Old Woman with Atrial Fibrillation and Small Right Ventricular Dimensions. An Unusual Genetic Variant of Long QT Syndrome with Late Presentation in the Sixth Decade. Letter from the Editor in Chief. Robotic Magnetic Navigation Versus Manual Catheter Ablation for Premature Ventricular Contractions: A Single-center Retrospective Cohort Study. Left Bundle Branch Tachycardia: A Nightmare Confluence of Tachycardia and Bradycardia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1