STEMI 稳定期患者进行多血管血运重建的时机:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Revista española de cardiología (English ed.) Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1016/j.rec.2024.06.002
Felix Voll, Constantin Kuna, Maria Scalamogna, Thorsten Kessler, Sebastian Kufner, Tobias Rheude, Hendrik B Sager, Erion Xhepa, Jens Wiebe, Michael Joner, Robert A Byrne, Heribert Schunkert, Gjin Ndrepepa, Barbara E Stähli, Adnan Kastrati, Salvatore Cassese
{"title":"STEMI 稳定期患者进行多血管血运重建的时机:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Felix Voll, Constantin Kuna, Maria Scalamogna, Thorsten Kessler, Sebastian Kufner, Tobias Rheude, Hendrik B Sager, Erion Xhepa, Jens Wiebe, Michael Joner, Robert A Byrne, Heribert Schunkert, Gjin Ndrepepa, Barbara E Stähli, Adnan Kastrati, Salvatore Cassese","doi":"10.1016/j.rec.2024.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MV-PCI) is recommended in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) without cardiogenic shock. The present network meta-analysis investigated the optimal timing of MV-PCI in this context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We pooled the aggregated data from randomized trials investigating stable STEMI patients with multivessel CAD treated with a strategy of either MV-PCI or culprit vessel-only PCI. The primary outcome was all-cause death. The main secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 11 trials, a total of 10 507 patients were randomly assigned to MV-PCI (same sitting, n=1683; staged during the index hospitalization, n=3460; staged during a subsequent hospitalization within 45 days, n=3275) or to culprit vessel-only PCI (n=2089). The median follow-up was 18.6 months. In comparison with culprit vessel-only PCI, MV-PCI staged during the index hospitalization significantly reduced all-cause death (risk ratio, 0.73; 95%CI, 0.56-0.92; P=.008) and ranked as possibly the best treatment option for this outcome compared with all other strategies. In comparison with culprit vessel-only PCI, a MV-PCI reduced cardiovascular mortality without differences dependent on the timing of revascularization. MV-PCI within the index hospitalization, either in a single procedure or staged, significantly reduced myocardial infarction and unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization, with no significant difference between each other.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with STEMI and multivessel CAD without cardiogenic shock, multivessel PCI within the index hospitalization, either in a single procedure or staged, represents the safest and most efficacious approach. The different timings of multivessel PCI did not result in any significant differences in all-cause death. This study is registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023457794).</p>","PeriodicalId":38430,"journal":{"name":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Timing of multivessel revascularization in stable patients with STEMI: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Felix Voll, Constantin Kuna, Maria Scalamogna, Thorsten Kessler, Sebastian Kufner, Tobias Rheude, Hendrik B Sager, Erion Xhepa, Jens Wiebe, Michael Joner, Robert A Byrne, Heribert Schunkert, Gjin Ndrepepa, Barbara E Stähli, Adnan Kastrati, Salvatore Cassese\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rec.2024.06.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MV-PCI) is recommended in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) without cardiogenic shock. The present network meta-analysis investigated the optimal timing of MV-PCI in this context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We pooled the aggregated data from randomized trials investigating stable STEMI patients with multivessel CAD treated with a strategy of either MV-PCI or culprit vessel-only PCI. The primary outcome was all-cause death. The main secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 11 trials, a total of 10 507 patients were randomly assigned to MV-PCI (same sitting, n=1683; staged during the index hospitalization, n=3460; staged during a subsequent hospitalization within 45 days, n=3275) or to culprit vessel-only PCI (n=2089). The median follow-up was 18.6 months. In comparison with culprit vessel-only PCI, MV-PCI staged during the index hospitalization significantly reduced all-cause death (risk ratio, 0.73; 95%CI, 0.56-0.92; P=.008) and ranked as possibly the best treatment option for this outcome compared with all other strategies. In comparison with culprit vessel-only PCI, a MV-PCI reduced cardiovascular mortality without differences dependent on the timing of revascularization. MV-PCI within the index hospitalization, either in a single procedure or staged, significantly reduced myocardial infarction and unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization, with no significant difference between each other.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with STEMI and multivessel CAD without cardiogenic shock, multivessel PCI within the index hospitalization, either in a single procedure or staged, represents the safest and most efficacious approach. The different timings of multivessel PCI did not result in any significant differences in all-cause death. This study is registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023457794).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2024.06.002\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2024.06.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言和目标:建议ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)和多支血管冠状动脉疾病(CAD)且无心源性休克的患者接受多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(MV-PCI)。本网络荟萃分析研究了在这种情况下 MV-PCI 的最佳时机:我们汇集了研究稳定型 STEMI 患者的随机试验数据,这些试验采用了 MV-PCI 或仅对罪魁祸首血管进行 PCI 治疗的策略。主要结果为全因死亡。主要次要结局为心血管死亡、心肌梗死和计划外缺血驱动的血管再通。该研究已在 PROSPERO(CRD42023457794)上注册:结果:在11项试验中,共有10 507名患者被随机分配到MV-PCI(同一坐位,n = 1683;在指数住院期间分期,n = 3460;在45天内的后续住院期间分期,n = 3275)或单纯罪魁祸首血管PCI(n = 2089)。中位随访时间为 18.6 个月。与单纯死因血管 PCI 相比,在指数住院期间分期的 MV-PCI 显著降低了全因死亡(风险比为 0.73;95%CI 为 0.56-0.92;P = .008),与所有其他策略相比,可能是针对这一结果的最佳治疗方案。与仅对罪魁祸首血管进行 PCI 相比,MV-PCI 可降低心血管死亡率,但与血管重建的时间无关。在指数住院期间进行MV-PCI,无论是单次手术还是分期手术,都能显著减少心肌梗死和计划外缺血导致的血管再通,但两者之间没有显著差异:对于 STEMI 和多支血管 CAD 且无心源性休克的患者,在指数住院期间进行多支血管 PCI(无论是单次手术还是分期手术)是最安全、最有效的方法。多血管PCI的不同时机并不会导致全因死亡的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Timing of multivessel revascularization in stable patients with STEMI: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Introduction and objectives: Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MV-PCI) is recommended in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) without cardiogenic shock. The present network meta-analysis investigated the optimal timing of MV-PCI in this context.

Methods: We pooled the aggregated data from randomized trials investigating stable STEMI patients with multivessel CAD treated with a strategy of either MV-PCI or culprit vessel-only PCI. The primary outcome was all-cause death. The main secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization.

Results: Among 11 trials, a total of 10 507 patients were randomly assigned to MV-PCI (same sitting, n=1683; staged during the index hospitalization, n=3460; staged during a subsequent hospitalization within 45 days, n=3275) or to culprit vessel-only PCI (n=2089). The median follow-up was 18.6 months. In comparison with culprit vessel-only PCI, MV-PCI staged during the index hospitalization significantly reduced all-cause death (risk ratio, 0.73; 95%CI, 0.56-0.92; P=.008) and ranked as possibly the best treatment option for this outcome compared with all other strategies. In comparison with culprit vessel-only PCI, a MV-PCI reduced cardiovascular mortality without differences dependent on the timing of revascularization. MV-PCI within the index hospitalization, either in a single procedure or staged, significantly reduced myocardial infarction and unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization, with no significant difference between each other.

Conclusions: In patients with STEMI and multivessel CAD without cardiogenic shock, multivessel PCI within the index hospitalization, either in a single procedure or staged, represents the safest and most efficacious approach. The different timings of multivessel PCI did not result in any significant differences in all-cause death. This study is registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023457794).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
219
期刊最新文献
Impact of left ventricular unloading on postheart transplantation outcomes in patients bridged with VA-ECMO. David after Ross: a possible option before Bentall? Prognostic significance of right ventriculoarterial coupling in patients undergoing isolated tricuspid valve surgery. Prognostic role of persistent angina after percutaneous revascularization in chronic coronary syndrome with altered angiography and stress CMR. Recent advances in precision nutrition and cardiometabolic diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1