促进者为改善初级保健中对心血管风险因素的控制而采用的实施策略。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2023.230312R1
Allison M Cole, Gina A Keppel, Laura-Mae Baldwin, Erika Holden, Michael Parchman
{"title":"促进者为改善初级保健中对心血管风险因素的控制而采用的实施策略。","authors":"Allison M Cole, Gina A Keppel, Laura-Mae Baldwin, Erika Holden, Michael Parchman","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2023.230312R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Practice facilitation supports practice change in clinical settings. Despite its widespread use little is known about how facilitators enable change.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study identifies which implementation strategies practice facilitators used and the frequency of their use in a study to improve the quality of cardiovascular care in primary care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis of data collected by practice facilitators in the Healthy Hearts Northwest (H2N) study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Notes collected by facilitators in the H2N study.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>We coded these field notes for a purposeful sample of 44 practices to identify Expert Recommendations for Implementation Change (ERIC) strategies used with each practice and calculated the proportion of practices where each implementation strategy was coded at least once. Strategies were categorized as foundational (used in 80% to 100% of practices), moderately used (20%-<80% of practices), rarely used (1-[Formula: see text]% of practices), or absent (0%).</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>We identified 26 strategies used by facilitators. Five strategies were foundational: Develop and/or implement tools for quality monitoring, Assess barriers that may impede implementation, Assess for readiness or progress, Develop and support teams, and Conduct educational meetings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Commonly used strategies can help guide development of the core components of practice facilitation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"444-454"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11514367/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation Strategies Used by Facilitators to Improve Control of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Primary Care.\",\"authors\":\"Allison M Cole, Gina A Keppel, Laura-Mae Baldwin, Erika Holden, Michael Parchman\",\"doi\":\"10.3122/jabfm.2023.230312R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Practice facilitation supports practice change in clinical settings. Despite its widespread use little is known about how facilitators enable change.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study identifies which implementation strategies practice facilitators used and the frequency of their use in a study to improve the quality of cardiovascular care in primary care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis of data collected by practice facilitators in the Healthy Hearts Northwest (H2N) study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Notes collected by facilitators in the H2N study.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>We coded these field notes for a purposeful sample of 44 practices to identify Expert Recommendations for Implementation Change (ERIC) strategies used with each practice and calculated the proportion of practices where each implementation strategy was coded at least once. Strategies were categorized as foundational (used in 80% to 100% of practices), moderately used (20%-<80% of practices), rarely used (1-[Formula: see text]% of practices), or absent (0%).</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>We identified 26 strategies used by facilitators. Five strategies were foundational: Develop and/or implement tools for quality monitoring, Assess barriers that may impede implementation, Assess for readiness or progress, Develop and support teams, and Conduct educational meetings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Commonly used strategies can help guide development of the core components of practice facilitation strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"444-454\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11514367/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2023.230312R1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2023.230312R1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:实践促进支持临床实践变革。尽管这种方法被广泛使用,但人们对促进者如何促成变革却知之甚少:本研究确定了在一项旨在提高初级保健中心血管护理质量的研究中,实践促进者使用了哪些实施策略及其使用频率:设计:对西北健康心脏(H2N)研究中实践促进者收集的数据进行横断面分析:H2N 研究中促进者收集的笔记:我们对有目的的 44 个实践样本的现场笔记进行了编码,以确定每个实践中使用的实施变革专家建议(ERIC)策略,并计算每个实施策略至少被编码一次的实践比例。我们将这些策略分为基础策略(80% 到 100% 的实践中使用)、中度使用策略(20%-关键结果)和非基础策略(20%-关键结果):我们确定了促进者使用的 26 种策略。五项策略是基础性的:开发和/或实施质量监控工具、评估可能阻碍实施的障碍、评估准备情况或进展情况、发展和支持团队,以及召开教育会议:结论:常用策略有助于指导实践促进策略核心组成部分的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implementation Strategies Used by Facilitators to Improve Control of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Primary Care.

Background: Practice facilitation supports practice change in clinical settings. Despite its widespread use little is known about how facilitators enable change.

Objective: This study identifies which implementation strategies practice facilitators used and the frequency of their use in a study to improve the quality of cardiovascular care in primary care.

Design: Cross-sectional analysis of data collected by practice facilitators in the Healthy Hearts Northwest (H2N) study.

Participants: Notes collected by facilitators in the H2N study.

Approach: We coded these field notes for a purposeful sample of 44 practices to identify Expert Recommendations for Implementation Change (ERIC) strategies used with each practice and calculated the proportion of practices where each implementation strategy was coded at least once. Strategies were categorized as foundational (used in 80% to 100% of practices), moderately used (20%-<80% of practices), rarely used (1-[Formula: see text]% of practices), or absent (0%).

Key results: We identified 26 strategies used by facilitators. Five strategies were foundational: Develop and/or implement tools for quality monitoring, Assess barriers that may impede implementation, Assess for readiness or progress, Develop and support teams, and Conduct educational meetings.

Conclusions: Commonly used strategies can help guide development of the core components of practice facilitation strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
期刊最新文献
Answering the "100 Most Important Family Medicine Research Questions" from the 1985 Hames Consortium. CERA: A Vehicle for Facilitating Research in Family Medicine. Current and Future Challenges to Publishing Family Medicine Research. Diversity in Family Medicine Research. Leveraging the All of Us Database for Primary Care Research with Large Datasets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1