{"title":"小儿脑肿瘤幸存者的认知灵活性表现与适应行为结果之间的关系。","authors":"Kylie A Szymanski, Jordan E Pincus, Tricia Z King","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2024.2361967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>: Survivors of pediatric brain tumors are at increased risk of executive function (EF) and adaptive behavior difficulties. While previous research suggests that executive dysfunction impacts suboptimal adaptive outcomes, the specific elements of EF influencing this relationship remain unexplored. This study examines the relationship between cognitive flexibility and adaptive behavior in survivors compared to healthy controls. <b>Methods</b>: 86 survivors (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub>(<i>SD</i>)=23.41(4.24), 44 females) and 86 controls (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub>(<i>SD</i>)=23.09(4.50), 44 females) completed the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Trail Making Test (TMT) and Verbal Fluency Test (VFT). The Letter-Number Sequencing (LNS) and Category Switching (CS) conditions were isolated as measures of cognitive flexibility. Informants provided responses to obtain adaptive behavior ratings using the Scales of Independent Behavior-Revised (SIB-R). Linear regressions explored relationships between cognitive flexibility and SIB-R scores in survivors compared to controls. <b>Results</b>: For both TMT and VFT, the relationship between cognitive flexibility and adaptive behavior was significantly different between survivors and controls for SIB-R scores in Social Communication, Community Living, and Personal Living Skills (<i>p</i><.0125). Survivors' better LNS performance predicted greater SIB-R scores across the same 3 domains (all <i>p</i>= <.001, <i>r</i><sup>2</sup>semipartial=.08). Similarly, survivors' better CS performance predicted greater SIB-R scores across the same 3 domains (<i>p</i> = 0.002 to .02, <i>r</i><sup>2</sup>semipartial =.03 to .04). No significant relationships were found in controls (all <i>p</i> >.05). After adjusting for working memory and inhibitory control, most relationships remained significant in survivors (<i>p</i>= <.001 to .046, <i>r</i><sup>2</sup>semipartial=.02 to .08). <b>Conclusion</b>: These findings reveal a robust, positive relationship between cognitive flexibility performance and adaptive behaviors specific to survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationships between cognitive flexibility performance and adaptive behavior outcomes in survivors of pediatric brain tumor.\",\"authors\":\"Kylie A Szymanski, Jordan E Pincus, Tricia Z King\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13854046.2024.2361967\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective</b>: Survivors of pediatric brain tumors are at increased risk of executive function (EF) and adaptive behavior difficulties. While previous research suggests that executive dysfunction impacts suboptimal adaptive outcomes, the specific elements of EF influencing this relationship remain unexplored. This study examines the relationship between cognitive flexibility and adaptive behavior in survivors compared to healthy controls. <b>Methods</b>: 86 survivors (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub>(<i>SD</i>)=23.41(4.24), 44 females) and 86 controls (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub>(<i>SD</i>)=23.09(4.50), 44 females) completed the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Trail Making Test (TMT) and Verbal Fluency Test (VFT). The Letter-Number Sequencing (LNS) and Category Switching (CS) conditions were isolated as measures of cognitive flexibility. Informants provided responses to obtain adaptive behavior ratings using the Scales of Independent Behavior-Revised (SIB-R). Linear regressions explored relationships between cognitive flexibility and SIB-R scores in survivors compared to controls. <b>Results</b>: For both TMT and VFT, the relationship between cognitive flexibility and adaptive behavior was significantly different between survivors and controls for SIB-R scores in Social Communication, Community Living, and Personal Living Skills (<i>p</i><.0125). Survivors' better LNS performance predicted greater SIB-R scores across the same 3 domains (all <i>p</i>= <.001, <i>r</i><sup>2</sup>semipartial=.08). Similarly, survivors' better CS performance predicted greater SIB-R scores across the same 3 domains (<i>p</i> = 0.002 to .02, <i>r</i><sup>2</sup>semipartial =.03 to .04). No significant relationships were found in controls (all <i>p</i> >.05). After adjusting for working memory and inhibitory control, most relationships remained significant in survivors (<i>p</i>= <.001 to .046, <i>r</i><sup>2</sup>semipartial=.02 to .08). <b>Conclusion</b>: These findings reveal a robust, positive relationship between cognitive flexibility performance and adaptive behaviors specific to survivors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neuropsychologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neuropsychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2024.2361967\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2024.2361967","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Relationships between cognitive flexibility performance and adaptive behavior outcomes in survivors of pediatric brain tumor.
Objective: Survivors of pediatric brain tumors are at increased risk of executive function (EF) and adaptive behavior difficulties. While previous research suggests that executive dysfunction impacts suboptimal adaptive outcomes, the specific elements of EF influencing this relationship remain unexplored. This study examines the relationship between cognitive flexibility and adaptive behavior in survivors compared to healthy controls. Methods: 86 survivors (Mage(SD)=23.41(4.24), 44 females) and 86 controls (Mage(SD)=23.09(4.50), 44 females) completed the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Trail Making Test (TMT) and Verbal Fluency Test (VFT). The Letter-Number Sequencing (LNS) and Category Switching (CS) conditions were isolated as measures of cognitive flexibility. Informants provided responses to obtain adaptive behavior ratings using the Scales of Independent Behavior-Revised (SIB-R). Linear regressions explored relationships between cognitive flexibility and SIB-R scores in survivors compared to controls. Results: For both TMT and VFT, the relationship between cognitive flexibility and adaptive behavior was significantly different between survivors and controls for SIB-R scores in Social Communication, Community Living, and Personal Living Skills (p<.0125). Survivors' better LNS performance predicted greater SIB-R scores across the same 3 domains (all p= <.001, r2semipartial=.08). Similarly, survivors' better CS performance predicted greater SIB-R scores across the same 3 domains (p = 0.002 to .02, r2semipartial =.03 to .04). No significant relationships were found in controls (all p >.05). After adjusting for working memory and inhibitory control, most relationships remained significant in survivors (p= <.001 to .046, r2semipartial=.02 to .08). Conclusion: These findings reveal a robust, positive relationship between cognitive flexibility performance and adaptive behaviors specific to survivors.
期刊介绍:
The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.