在 14 个欧洲国家,酒精健康警示标签对酒精致癌风险相关知识及其公众认知的影响:在线调查实验。

IF 25.4 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Lancet Public Health Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00102-6
Daniela Correia, Daša Kokole, Jürgen Rehm, Alexander Tran, Carina Ferreira-Borges, Gauden Galea, Tiina Likki, Aleksandra Olsen, Maria Neufeld
{"title":"在 14 个欧洲国家,酒精健康警示标签对酒精致癌风险相关知识及其公众认知的影响:在线调查实验。","authors":"Daniela Correia, Daša Kokole, Jürgen Rehm, Alexander Tran, Carina Ferreira-Borges, Gauden Galea, Tiina Likki, Aleksandra Olsen, Maria Neufeld","doi":"10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00102-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alcohol health-warning labels are a policy option that can contribute to the reduction of alcohol-related harms, but their effects and public perception depend on their content and format. Our study aimed to investigate the effect of health warnings on knowledge that alcohol causes cancer, the perceptions of three different message topics (responsible drinking, general health harm of alcohol, and alcohol causing cancer), and the role of images included with the cancer message.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this online survey experiment, distributed in 14 European countries and targeting adults of the legal alcohol-purchase age who consumed alcohol, participants were randomly allocated to one of six label conditions using a pseudorandom number generator stratified by survey language before completing a questionnaire with items measuring knowledge and label perceptions. Effect on knowledge was assessed as a primary outcome by comparing participants who had increased knowledge after exposure to labels with the rest of the sample, for the six label conditions. Label perceptions were compared between label conditions as secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>19 110 participants completed the survey and were eligible for analysis. Our results showed that a third of the participants exposed to the cancer message increased their knowledge of alcohol causing cancer (increase for 1131 [32·5%, 95% CI 29·8 to 35·2] of 3409 participants [weighted percentage] for text-only message; increase for 1096 [33·3%, 30·4 to 36·2] of 3198 [weighted percentage] for message inlcuding pictogram; and increase for 1030 [32·5%, 29·6 to 35·4] of 3242 [weighted percentage] for message including graphic image), compared with an increase for 76 (2·4%, -1·2 to 6·0) of 3018 participants who viewed the control message. Logistic regression showed that cancer messages increased knowledge compared with the control label (odds ratio [OR]<sub>text only</sub> 20·20, 95% CI 15·88 to 26·12; OR<sub>pictogram</sub> 21·16, 16·62 to 27·38; OR<sub>graphic-image</sub> 20·61, 16·19 to 26·68). Cancer messages had the highest perceived impact and relevance, followed by general health harm and responsibility messages. Text-only and pictogram cancer messages were seen as clear, comprehensive, and acceptable, whereas those including an image of a patient with cancer had lower acceptability and the highest avoidance rating of all the labels. The only identified interaction between perceptions and experimental conditions (with gender) indicated higher comprehensibility and acceptability ratings of cancer labels than responsibility messages and control labels by women, with the results reversed in men.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Health warnings are an effective policy option to increase knowledge of alcohol causing cancer, with a generalisable effect across several countries. Europeans consider alcohol health-warning labels to be comprehensible and acceptable, with cancer-specific health warnings having the highest perceived impact and relevance.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>EU4Health.</p>","PeriodicalId":56027,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Public Health","volume":"9 7","pages":"e470-e480"},"PeriodicalIF":25.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11228425/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of alcohol health warning labels on knowledge related to the ill effects of alcohol on cancer risk and their public perceptions in 14 European countries: an online survey experiment.\",\"authors\":\"Daniela Correia, Daša Kokole, Jürgen Rehm, Alexander Tran, Carina Ferreira-Borges, Gauden Galea, Tiina Likki, Aleksandra Olsen, Maria Neufeld\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00102-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alcohol health-warning labels are a policy option that can contribute to the reduction of alcohol-related harms, but their effects and public perception depend on their content and format. Our study aimed to investigate the effect of health warnings on knowledge that alcohol causes cancer, the perceptions of three different message topics (responsible drinking, general health harm of alcohol, and alcohol causing cancer), and the role of images included with the cancer message.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this online survey experiment, distributed in 14 European countries and targeting adults of the legal alcohol-purchase age who consumed alcohol, participants were randomly allocated to one of six label conditions using a pseudorandom number generator stratified by survey language before completing a questionnaire with items measuring knowledge and label perceptions. Effect on knowledge was assessed as a primary outcome by comparing participants who had increased knowledge after exposure to labels with the rest of the sample, for the six label conditions. Label perceptions were compared between label conditions as secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>19 110 participants completed the survey and were eligible for analysis. Our results showed that a third of the participants exposed to the cancer message increased their knowledge of alcohol causing cancer (increase for 1131 [32·5%, 95% CI 29·8 to 35·2] of 3409 participants [weighted percentage] for text-only message; increase for 1096 [33·3%, 30·4 to 36·2] of 3198 [weighted percentage] for message inlcuding pictogram; and increase for 1030 [32·5%, 29·6 to 35·4] of 3242 [weighted percentage] for message including graphic image), compared with an increase for 76 (2·4%, -1·2 to 6·0) of 3018 participants who viewed the control message. Logistic regression showed that cancer messages increased knowledge compared with the control label (odds ratio [OR]<sub>text only</sub> 20·20, 95% CI 15·88 to 26·12; OR<sub>pictogram</sub> 21·16, 16·62 to 27·38; OR<sub>graphic-image</sub> 20·61, 16·19 to 26·68). Cancer messages had the highest perceived impact and relevance, followed by general health harm and responsibility messages. Text-only and pictogram cancer messages were seen as clear, comprehensive, and acceptable, whereas those including an image of a patient with cancer had lower acceptability and the highest avoidance rating of all the labels. The only identified interaction between perceptions and experimental conditions (with gender) indicated higher comprehensibility and acceptability ratings of cancer labels than responsibility messages and control labels by women, with the results reversed in men.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Health warnings are an effective policy option to increase knowledge of alcohol causing cancer, with a generalisable effect across several countries. Europeans consider alcohol health-warning labels to be comprehensible and acceptable, with cancer-specific health warnings having the highest perceived impact and relevance.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>EU4Health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Public Health\",\"volume\":\"9 7\",\"pages\":\"e470-e480\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":25.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11228425/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00102-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00102-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:酒精健康警示标签是一种有助于减少酒精相关危害的政策选择,但其效果和公众认知取决于标签的内容和形式。我们的研究旨在调查健康警示对酒精致癌知识的影响、对三种不同信息主题(负责任饮酒、酒精对健康的一般危害和酒精致癌)的认知,以及癌症信息中包含的图片的作用:这项在线调查实验在欧洲 14 个国家进行,目标受众是达到法定饮酒年龄的成年人。参与者在填写调查问卷之前,先使用伪随机数生成器按调查语言分层随机分配到六种标签条件之一,然后再填写一份调查问卷,其中包括测量知识和标签感知的项目。在六种标签条件下,通过比较接触标签后知识增加的参与者和其他样本参与者,评估对知识的影响作为主要结果。作为次要结果,对不同标签条件下的标签认知进行了比较:19 110 名参与者完成了调查并符合分析条件。我们的结果表明,三分之一接触过癌症信息的参与者增加了对酒精致癌的认识(在 3409 名参与者中,有 1131 人[32-5%,95% CI 29-8 至 35-2][加权百分比]增加了对纯文字信息的认识,1096 人[33-3%,95% CI 29-8 至 35-2]增加了对酒精致癌的认识);在 3198 名参与者中有 1096 人[33-3%,30-4 至 36-2][加权百分比]增加了对包含象形图的信息的了解;在 3242 名参与者中有 1030 人[32-5%,29-6 至 35-4][加权百分比]增加了对包含图形图像的信息的了解),而在 3018 名参与者中有 76 人(2-4%,-1-2 至 6-0)增加了对对照组信息的了解。逻辑回归结果表明,与对照组相比,癌症信息增加了人们对癌症的了解(几率比[OR]:纯文字 20-20,95% CI 15-88 到 26-12;OR:图形 21-16,16-62 到 27-38;OR:图形图像 20-61,16-19 到 26-68)。癌症信息的影响力和相关性最高,其次是一般健康危害和责任信息。纯文字和象形图癌症信息被认为是清晰、全面和可接受的,而包含癌症患者图像的信息可接受性较低,在所有标签中回避率最高。认知与实验条件(性别)之间唯一确定的交互作用表明,女性对癌症标签的可理解性和可接受性的评价高于责任信息和对照标签,而男性的结果则相反:健康警示是一种有效的政策选择,可以提高人们对酒精致癌的认识,并在多个国家产生普遍影响。欧洲人认为酒精健康警示标签是可以理解和接受的,其中针对癌症的健康警示具有最大的影响力和相关性:资金来源:EU4Health。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of alcohol health warning labels on knowledge related to the ill effects of alcohol on cancer risk and their public perceptions in 14 European countries: an online survey experiment.

Background: Alcohol health-warning labels are a policy option that can contribute to the reduction of alcohol-related harms, but their effects and public perception depend on their content and format. Our study aimed to investigate the effect of health warnings on knowledge that alcohol causes cancer, the perceptions of three different message topics (responsible drinking, general health harm of alcohol, and alcohol causing cancer), and the role of images included with the cancer message.

Methods: In this online survey experiment, distributed in 14 European countries and targeting adults of the legal alcohol-purchase age who consumed alcohol, participants were randomly allocated to one of six label conditions using a pseudorandom number generator stratified by survey language before completing a questionnaire with items measuring knowledge and label perceptions. Effect on knowledge was assessed as a primary outcome by comparing participants who had increased knowledge after exposure to labels with the rest of the sample, for the six label conditions. Label perceptions were compared between label conditions as secondary outcomes.

Findings: 19 110 participants completed the survey and were eligible for analysis. Our results showed that a third of the participants exposed to the cancer message increased their knowledge of alcohol causing cancer (increase for 1131 [32·5%, 95% CI 29·8 to 35·2] of 3409 participants [weighted percentage] for text-only message; increase for 1096 [33·3%, 30·4 to 36·2] of 3198 [weighted percentage] for message inlcuding pictogram; and increase for 1030 [32·5%, 29·6 to 35·4] of 3242 [weighted percentage] for message including graphic image), compared with an increase for 76 (2·4%, -1·2 to 6·0) of 3018 participants who viewed the control message. Logistic regression showed that cancer messages increased knowledge compared with the control label (odds ratio [OR]text only 20·20, 95% CI 15·88 to 26·12; ORpictogram 21·16, 16·62 to 27·38; ORgraphic-image 20·61, 16·19 to 26·68). Cancer messages had the highest perceived impact and relevance, followed by general health harm and responsibility messages. Text-only and pictogram cancer messages were seen as clear, comprehensive, and acceptable, whereas those including an image of a patient with cancer had lower acceptability and the highest avoidance rating of all the labels. The only identified interaction between perceptions and experimental conditions (with gender) indicated higher comprehensibility and acceptability ratings of cancer labels than responsibility messages and control labels by women, with the results reversed in men.

Interpretation: Health warnings are an effective policy option to increase knowledge of alcohol causing cancer, with a generalisable effect across several countries. Europeans consider alcohol health-warning labels to be comprehensible and acceptable, with cancer-specific health warnings having the highest perceived impact and relevance.

Funding: EU4Health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Public Health
Lancet Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
55.60
自引率
0.80%
发文量
305
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Public Health is committed to tackling the most pressing issues across all aspects of public health. We have a strong commitment to using science to improve health equity and social justice. In line with the values and vision of The Lancet, we take a broad and inclusive approach to public health and are interested in interdisciplinary research. We publish a range of content types that can advance public health policies and outcomes. These include Articles, Review, Comment, and Correspondence. Learn more about the types of papers we publish.
期刊最新文献
Control of childhood obesity and implications for policy in China Public health interventions against childhood obesity in China Determinants of childhood obesity in China Obesity in China: what we know and what we can do Diabetes in China part 2: prevention, challenges, and progress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1