{"title":"局部臭氧注射与局部糖皮质激素注射治疗腕管综合征的比较:随机对照试验","authors":"Farnaz Hesam, Amid-Aldin Khatibi, Mohamadreza Vafaeenasab, Behnaz Tirandazi, Fereshteh Sharifi Dorcheh","doi":"10.5606/tftrd.2024.12590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of local ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) injection versus corticosteroid injection in the treatment of mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This double-blind randomized controlled trial was performed on 42 patients (9 males, 33 females; mean age: 46.7±2.1 years; range, 18 to 70 years) with mild to moderate CTS between May 2021 and June 2021. The corticosteroid group (n=21) was injected with 40 mg triamcinolone, and in the O<sub>3</sub> group B (n=21), 4 mL of a 10 mcg/mL oxygen (O<sub>2</sub>)-O<sub>3</sub> mixture was injected. Symptom severity and functional impairments were assessed using a Visual Analog Scale and Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. Electrodiagnostic and ultrasonographic parameters were obtained at baseline and eight weeks after the procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The O<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>3</sub> solution improved pain and Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire score after eight weeks (p<0.001); however, the change was nonsignificant compared to the corticosteroid group (p>0.05). Sensory nerve and compound muscle action potential latencies were not significantly changed eight weeks after O<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>3</sub> injection (p>0.05), while both were significantly decreased in the steroid injection group (p<0.001). Volar bulging and median nerve cross-section surface area were not improved after O<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>3</sub> injection, while the improvement was significant in the corticosteroid arm (p=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Symptoms in patients with mild to moderate CTS may be alleviated by local O<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>3</sub> injection; however, electrodiagnostic and ultrasonographic indices may be unchanged. Corticosteroid local injection may alleviate patient symptoms along with electrodiagnostic and ultrasonographic parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":56043,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11209334/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Local ozone injection compared to local glucocorticoid injection in carpal tunnel syndrome: A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Farnaz Hesam, Amid-Aldin Khatibi, Mohamadreza Vafaeenasab, Behnaz Tirandazi, Fereshteh Sharifi Dorcheh\",\"doi\":\"10.5606/tftrd.2024.12590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of local ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) injection versus corticosteroid injection in the treatment of mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This double-blind randomized controlled trial was performed on 42 patients (9 males, 33 females; mean age: 46.7±2.1 years; range, 18 to 70 years) with mild to moderate CTS between May 2021 and June 2021. The corticosteroid group (n=21) was injected with 40 mg triamcinolone, and in the O<sub>3</sub> group B (n=21), 4 mL of a 10 mcg/mL oxygen (O<sub>2</sub>)-O<sub>3</sub> mixture was injected. Symptom severity and functional impairments were assessed using a Visual Analog Scale and Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. Electrodiagnostic and ultrasonographic parameters were obtained at baseline and eight weeks after the procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The O<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>3</sub> solution improved pain and Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire score after eight weeks (p<0.001); however, the change was nonsignificant compared to the corticosteroid group (p>0.05). Sensory nerve and compound muscle action potential latencies were not significantly changed eight weeks after O<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>3</sub> injection (p>0.05), while both were significantly decreased in the steroid injection group (p<0.001). Volar bulging and median nerve cross-section surface area were not improved after O<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>3</sub> injection, while the improvement was significant in the corticosteroid arm (p=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Symptoms in patients with mild to moderate CTS may be alleviated by local O<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>3</sub> injection; however, electrodiagnostic and ultrasonographic indices may be unchanged. Corticosteroid local injection may alleviate patient symptoms along with electrodiagnostic and ultrasonographic parameters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11209334/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2024.12590\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2024.12590","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Local ozone injection compared to local glucocorticoid injection in carpal tunnel syndrome: A randomized controlled trial.
Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of local ozone (O3) injection versus corticosteroid injection in the treatment of mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).
Patients and methods: This double-blind randomized controlled trial was performed on 42 patients (9 males, 33 females; mean age: 46.7±2.1 years; range, 18 to 70 years) with mild to moderate CTS between May 2021 and June 2021. The corticosteroid group (n=21) was injected with 40 mg triamcinolone, and in the O3 group B (n=21), 4 mL of a 10 mcg/mL oxygen (O2)-O3 mixture was injected. Symptom severity and functional impairments were assessed using a Visual Analog Scale and Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. Electrodiagnostic and ultrasonographic parameters were obtained at baseline and eight weeks after the procedure.
Results: The O2-O3 solution improved pain and Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire score after eight weeks (p<0.001); however, the change was nonsignificant compared to the corticosteroid group (p>0.05). Sensory nerve and compound muscle action potential latencies were not significantly changed eight weeks after O2-O3 injection (p>0.05), while both were significantly decreased in the steroid injection group (p<0.001). Volar bulging and median nerve cross-section surface area were not improved after O2-O3 injection, while the improvement was significant in the corticosteroid arm (p=0.02).
Conclusion: Symptoms in patients with mild to moderate CTS may be alleviated by local O2-O3 injection; however, electrodiagnostic and ultrasonographic indices may be unchanged. Corticosteroid local injection may alleviate patient symptoms along with electrodiagnostic and ultrasonographic parameters.
期刊介绍:
The Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Formerly published as Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi) is the official journal of the Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The journal is an international open-access, double-blind peer-reviewed periodical journal bringing the latest developments in all aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation, and related fields. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, editorials, case reports (limited), letters to the editors. The target readership includes academic members, specialists, residents working in the fields of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The language of the journal is English and it is published quarterly (in March, June, September, and December).