将 3 名患者的维生素 D 代谢物比率作为评估维生素 D 状态的诊断标准的价值。

JCEM case reports Pub Date : 2024-06-28 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1210/jcemcr/luae095
Zhinous Shahidzadeh Yazdi, Elizabeth A Streeten, Hilary B Whitlatch, Salma A Bargal, Amber L Beitelshees, Simeon I Taylor
{"title":"将 3 名患者的维生素 D 代谢物比率作为评估维生素 D 状态的诊断标准的价值。","authors":"Zhinous Shahidzadeh Yazdi, Elizabeth A Streeten, Hilary B Whitlatch, Salma A Bargal, Amber L Beitelshees, Simeon I Taylor","doi":"10.1210/jcemcr/luae095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although clinical guidelines recommend measuring total plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) to assess vitamin D (VitD) status, this index does not account for 3-fold inter-individual variation in VitD binding protein (VDBP) level. We present 3 individuals with total plasma 25(OH)D levels of 10.8 to 12.3 ng/mL (27-30.7 nmol/L). Because Endocrine Society guidelines define VitD deficiency as 25(OH)D ≤ 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L), all 3 would be judged to be VitD deficient. VitD3 supplementation increased 25(OH)D to the range of 31.7 to 33.8 ng/mL (79.1-84.4 nmol/L). Patient #1 exhibited secondary hyperparathyroidism; VitD3 supplementation decreased parathyroid hormone (PTH) by 34% without a clinically significant change in PTH levels in the other 2 individuals. Thus, 25(OH)D level did not distinguish between the 1 patient who had secondary hyperparathyroidism and the 2 who did not. We therefore inquired whether VitD metabolite ratios (which are VDBP-independent) might distinguish among these 3 individuals. Of all the assessed ratios, the 1,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D/24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D ratio was the most informative, which had a value of 102 pg/ng in the individual with secondary hyperparathyroidism but lower values (41 and 20 pg/ng) in the other 2 individuals. These cases illustrate the value of the 1,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D/24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D ratio to provide clinically relevant information about VitD status.</p>","PeriodicalId":73540,"journal":{"name":"JCEM case reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11211852/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Value of Vitamin D Metabolite Ratios in 3 Patients as Diagnostic Criteria to Assess Vitamin D Status.\",\"authors\":\"Zhinous Shahidzadeh Yazdi, Elizabeth A Streeten, Hilary B Whitlatch, Salma A Bargal, Amber L Beitelshees, Simeon I Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1210/jcemcr/luae095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although clinical guidelines recommend measuring total plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) to assess vitamin D (VitD) status, this index does not account for 3-fold inter-individual variation in VitD binding protein (VDBP) level. We present 3 individuals with total plasma 25(OH)D levels of 10.8 to 12.3 ng/mL (27-30.7 nmol/L). Because Endocrine Society guidelines define VitD deficiency as 25(OH)D ≤ 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L), all 3 would be judged to be VitD deficient. VitD3 supplementation increased 25(OH)D to the range of 31.7 to 33.8 ng/mL (79.1-84.4 nmol/L). Patient #1 exhibited secondary hyperparathyroidism; VitD3 supplementation decreased parathyroid hormone (PTH) by 34% without a clinically significant change in PTH levels in the other 2 individuals. Thus, 25(OH)D level did not distinguish between the 1 patient who had secondary hyperparathyroidism and the 2 who did not. We therefore inquired whether VitD metabolite ratios (which are VDBP-independent) might distinguish among these 3 individuals. Of all the assessed ratios, the 1,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D/24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D ratio was the most informative, which had a value of 102 pg/ng in the individual with secondary hyperparathyroidism but lower values (41 and 20 pg/ng) in the other 2 individuals. These cases illustrate the value of the 1,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D/24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D ratio to provide clinically relevant information about VitD status.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCEM case reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11211852/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCEM case reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1210/jcemcr/luae095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCEM case reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/jcemcr/luae095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管临床指南建议通过测量血浆总25-羟基维生素D(25[OH]D)来评估维生素D(VitD)状态,但这一指标并没有考虑到维生素D结合蛋白(VDBP)水平3倍的个体间差异。我们介绍了 3 位血浆 25(OH)D 总水平为 10.8 至 12.3 纳克/毫升(27-30.7 毫摩尔/升)的个体。由于内分泌学会指南将维生素 D 缺乏定义为 25(OH)D ≤ 20 纳克/毫升(50 毫摩尔/升),因此这 3 人都被判定为维生素 D 缺乏。补充 VitD3 后,25(OH)D 增加到 31.7 至 33.8 纳克/毫升(79.1-84.4 毫摩尔/升)。1 号患者表现为继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进;补充 VitD3 后,甲状旁腺激素(PTH)降低了 34%,但其他 2 人的 PTH 水平没有发生有临床意义的变化。因此,25(OH)D水平并不能区分1例继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症患者和2例非继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症患者。因此,我们询问了维生素D代谢物比率(与VDBP无关)是否能区分这3人。在所有评估的比率中,1,25(OH)2D/24,25(OH)2D 比率最具参考价值,在患有继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症的患者中,该比率值为 102 pg/ng,而在另外两名患者中,该比率值则较低(分别为 41 和 20 pg/ng)。这些病例说明,1,25(OH)2D/24,25(OH)2D 比值可提供有关维生素 D 状态的临床相关信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Value of Vitamin D Metabolite Ratios in 3 Patients as Diagnostic Criteria to Assess Vitamin D Status.

Although clinical guidelines recommend measuring total plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) to assess vitamin D (VitD) status, this index does not account for 3-fold inter-individual variation in VitD binding protein (VDBP) level. We present 3 individuals with total plasma 25(OH)D levels of 10.8 to 12.3 ng/mL (27-30.7 nmol/L). Because Endocrine Society guidelines define VitD deficiency as 25(OH)D ≤ 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L), all 3 would be judged to be VitD deficient. VitD3 supplementation increased 25(OH)D to the range of 31.7 to 33.8 ng/mL (79.1-84.4 nmol/L). Patient #1 exhibited secondary hyperparathyroidism; VitD3 supplementation decreased parathyroid hormone (PTH) by 34% without a clinically significant change in PTH levels in the other 2 individuals. Thus, 25(OH)D level did not distinguish between the 1 patient who had secondary hyperparathyroidism and the 2 who did not. We therefore inquired whether VitD metabolite ratios (which are VDBP-independent) might distinguish among these 3 individuals. Of all the assessed ratios, the 1,25(OH)2D/24,25(OH)2D ratio was the most informative, which had a value of 102 pg/ng in the individual with secondary hyperparathyroidism but lower values (41 and 20 pg/ng) in the other 2 individuals. These cases illustrate the value of the 1,25(OH)2D/24,25(OH)2D ratio to provide clinically relevant information about VitD status.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Short Stature in Klinefelter Syndrome From Aggrecan Mutation. Challenging Diagnostic Workup of a 22-year-old Patient With Primary Pigmented Nodular Adrenocortical Disease. Efficacy of Racecadotril in a Patient Affected by a Therapy-Refractory VIPoma and Carcinoid Syndrome. Vitamin D-dependent Rickets Type 1A Mimicking Pseudohypoparathyroidism in Presence of Active Tuberculosis. Fatal Generalized Metastatic Calcifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1