优化ERCP技术以提高胆道刷洗的敏感性:系统回顾和元分析。

Robert C Verdonk, Roeland Zoutendijk, Peter J Van der Schaar, Paul Didden, Hans Kelder, Lodewijk A Brosens, Hjalmar C Van Santvoort, Mihaela G Raicu, Frank Vleggaar
{"title":"优化ERCP技术以提高胆道刷洗的敏感性:系统回顾和元分析。","authors":"Robert C Verdonk, Roeland Zoutendijk, Peter J Van der Schaar, Paul Didden, Hans Kelder, Lodewijk A Brosens, Hjalmar C Van Santvoort, Mihaela G Raicu, Frank Vleggaar","doi":"10.15403/jgld-5376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with brush cytology is an important tool in the diagnosis of hepatobiliary malignancies. However, reported sensitivity of brush cytology is suboptimal and differs markedly per study. The aim of this study is to analyze the optimal technique of endobiliary brushing during ERCP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis according was performed using Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane library, and reported reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. The intervention reported should involve ERCP, performed by the endoscopist with a comparison of different brushing techniques. The primary outcome was sensitivity for malignancy. Studies published up to December 2022 were included. Percutaneous techniques and cytological or laboratory techniques for processing of material were excluded. Bias was assessed using the Quadas-2 tool. Pooled sensitivity rates and Forest plots were analyzed for the primary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 studies were included. Three studies reported on brushing before or after dilation of a biliary stricture. No improvement in sensitivity was found. Five studies reported on alternative brush designs. This did not lead to improved sensitivity. Seven studies reported on the aspiration and analysis of bile fluid, which resulted in a 16% increase in sensitivity (95% CI 4-29%). One study reported an increased in the number of brush passes to the stricture, providing an increase in sensitivity of 20%. Substantial heterogeneity between studies was found, both methodological and statistical.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increasing the number of brush-passes and sending bile fluid for cytology increases the sensitivity of biliary brushings during ERCP. Dilation before brushing or alternative brush designs did not increase sensitivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":94081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD","volume":"33 2","pages":"254-260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization of ERCP Technique to Improve the Sensitivity of Biliary Brushing: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Robert C Verdonk, Roeland Zoutendijk, Peter J Van der Schaar, Paul Didden, Hans Kelder, Lodewijk A Brosens, Hjalmar C Van Santvoort, Mihaela G Raicu, Frank Vleggaar\",\"doi\":\"10.15403/jgld-5376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with brush cytology is an important tool in the diagnosis of hepatobiliary malignancies. However, reported sensitivity of brush cytology is suboptimal and differs markedly per study. The aim of this study is to analyze the optimal technique of endobiliary brushing during ERCP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis according was performed using Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane library, and reported reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. The intervention reported should involve ERCP, performed by the endoscopist with a comparison of different brushing techniques. The primary outcome was sensitivity for malignancy. Studies published up to December 2022 were included. Percutaneous techniques and cytological or laboratory techniques for processing of material were excluded. Bias was assessed using the Quadas-2 tool. Pooled sensitivity rates and Forest plots were analyzed for the primary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 studies were included. Three studies reported on brushing before or after dilation of a biliary stricture. No improvement in sensitivity was found. Five studies reported on alternative brush designs. This did not lead to improved sensitivity. Seven studies reported on the aspiration and analysis of bile fluid, which resulted in a 16% increase in sensitivity (95% CI 4-29%). One study reported an increased in the number of brush passes to the stricture, providing an increase in sensitivity of 20%. Substantial heterogeneity between studies was found, both methodological and statistical.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increasing the number of brush-passes and sending bile fluid for cytology increases the sensitivity of biliary brushings during ERCP. Dilation before brushing or alternative brush designs did not increase sensitivity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD\",\"volume\":\"33 2\",\"pages\":\"254-260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15403/jgld-5376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15403/jgld-5376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:带有刷状细胞学检查的内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)是诊断肝胆恶性肿瘤的重要工具。然而,据报道刷状细胞学的灵敏度并不理想,而且各研究之间存在明显差异。本研究旨在分析ERCP过程中胆道内刷洗的最佳技术:方法:使用 Pubmed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,并根据 PRISMA 指南进行报告。报告的干预措施应涉及ERCP,由内镜医师进行,并对不同的刷洗技术进行比较。主要结果是恶性肿瘤的敏感性。纳入截至 2022 年 12 月发表的研究。不包括经皮技术和细胞学或实验室材料处理技术。偏倚采用 Quadas-2 工具进行评估。对主要结果的汇总敏感率和森林图进行分析:结果:共纳入了 16 项研究。三项研究报告了胆道狭窄扩张前后的刷洗情况。结果发现敏感性没有提高。五项研究报告了替代刷子的设计。这并没有提高灵敏度。七项研究报告了胆汁液的抽吸和分析,结果显示敏感性提高了 16%(95% CI 4-29%)。一项研究报告增加了刷子通过狭窄处的次数,使敏感性提高了 20%。在方法学和统计学方面,研究之间存在很大的异质性:结论:增加刷洗次数并将胆汁送去进行细胞学检查可提高ERCP期间胆道刷洗的敏感性。刷管前扩张或其他刷管设计并不能提高敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimization of ERCP Technique to Improve the Sensitivity of Biliary Brushing: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background and aims: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with brush cytology is an important tool in the diagnosis of hepatobiliary malignancies. However, reported sensitivity of brush cytology is suboptimal and differs markedly per study. The aim of this study is to analyze the optimal technique of endobiliary brushing during ERCP.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis according was performed using Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane library, and reported reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. The intervention reported should involve ERCP, performed by the endoscopist with a comparison of different brushing techniques. The primary outcome was sensitivity for malignancy. Studies published up to December 2022 were included. Percutaneous techniques and cytological or laboratory techniques for processing of material were excluded. Bias was assessed using the Quadas-2 tool. Pooled sensitivity rates and Forest plots were analyzed for the primary outcome.

Results: A total of 16 studies were included. Three studies reported on brushing before or after dilation of a biliary stricture. No improvement in sensitivity was found. Five studies reported on alternative brush designs. This did not lead to improved sensitivity. Seven studies reported on the aspiration and analysis of bile fluid, which resulted in a 16% increase in sensitivity (95% CI 4-29%). One study reported an increased in the number of brush passes to the stricture, providing an increase in sensitivity of 20%. Substantial heterogeneity between studies was found, both methodological and statistical.

Conclusions: Increasing the number of brush-passes and sending bile fluid for cytology increases the sensitivity of biliary brushings during ERCP. Dilation before brushing or alternative brush designs did not increase sensitivity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cost, Cost-effectiveness and Survival Impact Assessment for A Better Management of Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Single Centre Comprehensive Analysis. Endoscopic Clips Marking for Transcatheter Arterial Embolization in Refractory Peptic Ulcer Bleeding Patients: A Cohort Study. Exploring the Role of Brain Fog, Fatigue, and Psychological Distress on Quality of Life in Individuals Living with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Cross-sectional Study. Gastric perineurioma: a rare entity with different clinical presentations. A case report. Idiosyncratic acute liver failure induced by Tirzepatide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1