阿达木单抗(Adalimumab)、英夫利昔单抗(Infliximab)、依那西普(Etanercept)、塞库单抗(Secukinumab)和优思库单抗(Ustekinumab)治疗银屑病的安全性概况--一项为期 30 个月的生物疗法不良事件观察性队列前瞻性研究。

Zoltán Paluch, Emanuel Marques, Petr Boháč, Kateřina Zemková, Jana Hercogová
{"title":"阿达木单抗(Adalimumab)、英夫利昔单抗(Infliximab)、依那西普(Etanercept)、塞库单抗(Secukinumab)和优思库单抗(Ustekinumab)治疗银屑病的安全性概况--一项为期 30 个月的生物疗法不良事件观察性队列前瞻性研究。","authors":"Zoltán Paluch, Emanuel Marques, Petr Boháč, Kateřina Zemková, Jana Hercogová","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although biologic agents are very effective, long-term comparative studies demonstrating their safety relative to one another are still lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 124 patients with psoriasis were followed up for 30 months; 74 received anti-TNF-alpha inhibitors (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab), 33 were on ustekinumab, and 17 were treated with secukinumab. The rates of adverse events in these groups were recorded and statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Infliximab-treated patients showed a high occurrence of asymptomatic, but increased liver enzymes, fatigue, and respiratory as well as dermatologic infections. Adalimumab-treated patients were more often affected by musculoskeletal disorders and infections of all types. Patients treated with secukinumab presented with higher rates of cardiovascular disorders as well as respiratory and dermatologic infections. The group receiving etanercept was more often diagnosed with musculoskeletal and reproductive disorders, specifically menstrual disorders. The rates of therapy discontinuation and serious adverse events did not reach statistically significant values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A higher incidence of adverse events was observed among adalimumab-, and infliximab-treated patients, with ustekinumab found to have the safest profile. Our results demonstrate that a personalized approach, including evaluation of a patient's risk profile, is necessary before commencing a biologic. Further research is warranted to confirm the findings of our study.</p>","PeriodicalId":94367,"journal":{"name":"Acta dermatovenerologica Croatica : ADC","volume":"32 1","pages":"7-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Safety Profiles of Adalimumab, Infliximab, Etanercept, Secukinumab and Ustekinumab in Psoriasis - A 30-month Observational Cohort Prospective Study of Adverse Events in Biologic Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Zoltán Paluch, Emanuel Marques, Petr Boháč, Kateřina Zemková, Jana Hercogová\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although biologic agents are very effective, long-term comparative studies demonstrating their safety relative to one another are still lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 124 patients with psoriasis were followed up for 30 months; 74 received anti-TNF-alpha inhibitors (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab), 33 were on ustekinumab, and 17 were treated with secukinumab. The rates of adverse events in these groups were recorded and statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Infliximab-treated patients showed a high occurrence of asymptomatic, but increased liver enzymes, fatigue, and respiratory as well as dermatologic infections. Adalimumab-treated patients were more often affected by musculoskeletal disorders and infections of all types. Patients treated with secukinumab presented with higher rates of cardiovascular disorders as well as respiratory and dermatologic infections. The group receiving etanercept was more often diagnosed with musculoskeletal and reproductive disorders, specifically menstrual disorders. The rates of therapy discontinuation and serious adverse events did not reach statistically significant values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A higher incidence of adverse events was observed among adalimumab-, and infliximab-treated patients, with ustekinumab found to have the safest profile. Our results demonstrate that a personalized approach, including evaluation of a patient's risk profile, is necessary before commencing a biologic. Further research is warranted to confirm the findings of our study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta dermatovenerologica Croatica : ADC\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"7-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta dermatovenerologica Croatica : ADC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta dermatovenerologica Croatica : ADC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管生物制剂非常有效,但仍缺乏证明其安全性的长期比较研究:尽管生物制剂非常有效,但目前仍缺乏证明其安全性的长期比较研究:对124名银屑病患者进行了为期30个月的随访,其中74人接受了抗肿瘤坏死因子α抑制剂(阿达木单抗、依那西普、英夫利昔单抗)治疗,33人接受了乌斯特库单抗治疗,17人接受了赛库单抗治疗。对这些组别的不良反应发生率进行了记录和统计分析:结果:接受英夫利西单抗治疗的患者出现无症状但肝酶升高、疲劳、呼吸道感染和皮肤感染的比例较高。接受阿达木单抗治疗的患者更常见肌肉骨骼疾病和各类感染。接受secukinumab治疗的患者出现心血管疾病以及呼吸道和皮肤感染的比例较高。接受依那西普治疗的患者更常被诊断出患有肌肉骨骼和生殖系统疾病,尤其是月经失调。治疗中断率和严重不良事件发生率未达到统计学意义上的显著值:阿达木单抗和英夫利昔单抗治疗患者的不良反应发生率较高,而乌司替尼的安全性最高。我们的研究结果表明,在开始使用生物制剂之前,有必要采取个性化的方法,包括评估患者的风险状况。为了证实我们的研究结果,有必要开展进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Safety Profiles of Adalimumab, Infliximab, Etanercept, Secukinumab and Ustekinumab in Psoriasis - A 30-month Observational Cohort Prospective Study of Adverse Events in Biologic Therapy.

Background: Although biologic agents are very effective, long-term comparative studies demonstrating their safety relative to one another are still lacking.

Methods: A total of 124 patients with psoriasis were followed up for 30 months; 74 received anti-TNF-alpha inhibitors (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab), 33 were on ustekinumab, and 17 were treated with secukinumab. The rates of adverse events in these groups were recorded and statistically analyzed.

Results: Infliximab-treated patients showed a high occurrence of asymptomatic, but increased liver enzymes, fatigue, and respiratory as well as dermatologic infections. Adalimumab-treated patients were more often affected by musculoskeletal disorders and infections of all types. Patients treated with secukinumab presented with higher rates of cardiovascular disorders as well as respiratory and dermatologic infections. The group receiving etanercept was more often diagnosed with musculoskeletal and reproductive disorders, specifically menstrual disorders. The rates of therapy discontinuation and serious adverse events did not reach statistically significant values.

Conclusion: A higher incidence of adverse events was observed among adalimumab-, and infliximab-treated patients, with ustekinumab found to have the safest profile. Our results demonstrate that a personalized approach, including evaluation of a patient's risk profile, is necessary before commencing a biologic. Further research is warranted to confirm the findings of our study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Bibliometric Analysis of Alopecia Areata Literature over the Past 50 Years. A Case of Noonan Syndrome and Kyrle's Disease: Coincidence or Causality? COVID-19-associated Telogen Effluvium After Hospital Discharge: A Prospective Cohort Study. Is There a Need to Educate Patients with Atopic Dermatitis in Baseline Therapy? Leukomelanoderma Resembling Hyperpigmented Mycosis Fungoides.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1