一项前瞻性、随机对照临床研究,比较透明质酸钠眼科粘液手术器械 FIDIAL PLUS 和 IAL®-F 在白内障手术中的疗效和安全性。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1089/jop.2024.0044
Camilla Pagnacco, Roberto Tosi, Jessica Dalsaso, Sebastiano Fraccaroli, Filippo Saggin, Giorgio Marchini
{"title":"一项前瞻性、随机对照临床研究,比较透明质酸钠眼科粘液手术器械 FIDIAL PLUS 和 IAL®-F 在白内障手术中的疗效和安全性。","authors":"Camilla Pagnacco, Roberto Tosi, Jessica Dalsaso, Sebastiano Fraccaroli, Filippo Saggin, Giorgio Marchini","doi":"10.1089/jop.2024.0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> To protect the corneal endothelium, various ophthalmical viscoelastic devices (OVDs) are used during cataract surgery. In this study, we compared two sodium hyaluronate-based OVD, the bacteria-derived FIDIAL PLUS OVD (test) with the animal-derived IAL<sup>®</sup>-F OVD (reference) during the surgical procedure. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Fifty patients with bilateral cataract participated in the study: 50 eyes randomly received FIDIAL PLUS and 50 eyes received IAL<sup>®</sup>-F (ratio 1:1). Noninferior efficacy of FIDIAL PLUS compared with reference OVD (first objective) was evaluated using a paired <i>t</i>-test comparing the mean percent loss of corneal endothelial cells (CECs) with FIDIAL PLUS against the mean percent loss with IAL<sup>®</sup>-F. Corneal endothelial protection during cataract surgery with FIDIAL PLUS without significant (≥30 mmHg) postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) increase (main secondary objective) was assessed using a repeated measures logistic model comparing the incidence of significant postoperative IOP elevation between the two groups. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy were also evaluated by assessing secondary endpoints before and after surgery. <b><i>Results:</i></b> FIDIAL PLUS showed a statistically noninferior efficacy compared with IAL<sup>®</sup>-F; there was no significant increase in IOP in either group or different trends of the secondary endpoints were observed between the OVD groups. The safety profile was similar in both OVD groups and no adverse device effects were reported. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> This study demonstrates the equivalent efficacy, tolerability, and safety of the bacteria-derived FIDIAL PLUS compared with the animal-derived IAL<sup>®</sup>-F, confirming the clinical value of this product.</p>","PeriodicalId":16689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"469-476"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Investigation Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Sodium Hyaluronate-Based Ophthalmical Viscosurgical Devices FIDIAL PLUS and IAL<sup>®</sup>-F in Cataract Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Camilla Pagnacco, Roberto Tosi, Jessica Dalsaso, Sebastiano Fraccaroli, Filippo Saggin, Giorgio Marchini\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jop.2024.0044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> To protect the corneal endothelium, various ophthalmical viscoelastic devices (OVDs) are used during cataract surgery. In this study, we compared two sodium hyaluronate-based OVD, the bacteria-derived FIDIAL PLUS OVD (test) with the animal-derived IAL<sup>®</sup>-F OVD (reference) during the surgical procedure. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Fifty patients with bilateral cataract participated in the study: 50 eyes randomly received FIDIAL PLUS and 50 eyes received IAL<sup>®</sup>-F (ratio 1:1). Noninferior efficacy of FIDIAL PLUS compared with reference OVD (first objective) was evaluated using a paired <i>t</i>-test comparing the mean percent loss of corneal endothelial cells (CECs) with FIDIAL PLUS against the mean percent loss with IAL<sup>®</sup>-F. Corneal endothelial protection during cataract surgery with FIDIAL PLUS without significant (≥30 mmHg) postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) increase (main secondary objective) was assessed using a repeated measures logistic model comparing the incidence of significant postoperative IOP elevation between the two groups. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy were also evaluated by assessing secondary endpoints before and after surgery. <b><i>Results:</i></b> FIDIAL PLUS showed a statistically noninferior efficacy compared with IAL<sup>®</sup>-F; there was no significant increase in IOP in either group or different trends of the secondary endpoints were observed between the OVD groups. The safety profile was similar in both OVD groups and no adverse device effects were reported. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> This study demonstrates the equivalent efficacy, tolerability, and safety of the bacteria-derived FIDIAL PLUS compared with the animal-derived IAL<sup>®</sup>-F, confirming the clinical value of this product.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"469-476\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2024.0044\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2024.0044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为了保护角膜内皮,白内障手术中使用了各种眼科粘弹性设备(OVD)。在本研究中,我们比较了两种基于透明质酸钠的 OVD,一种是细菌提取的 FIDIAL PLUS OVD(试验),另一种是动物提取的 IAL®-F OVD(参考)。方法:50 名双侧白内障患者参加了研究:50 只眼睛随机接受 FIDIAL PLUS,50 只眼睛接受 IAL®-F(比例为 1:1)。使用配对 t 检验比较 FIDIAL PLUS 与 IAL®-F 的角膜内皮细胞 (CEC) 平均损失百分比,评估 FIDIAL PLUS 与参考 OVD(第一目标)相比的非劣效性。使用重复测量逻辑模型比较两组患者术后眼压(IOP)显著升高的发生率,评估 FIDIAL PLUS 在白内障手术期间对角膜内皮的保护作用,且术后眼压(IOP)无显著(≥30 mmHg)升高(主要次要目标)。此外,还通过评估手术前后的次要终点来评估安全性、耐受性和疗效。结果:与 IAL®-F 相比,FIDIAL PLUS 的疗效在统计学上并不劣于 IAL®-F;两组患者的眼压均无明显升高,OVD 组之间的次要终点也无不同趋势。两组 OVD 的安全性相似,均未报告设备不良反应。结论:这项研究表明,与动物源性 IAL®-F 相比,细菌源性 FIDIAL PLUS 具有同等的疗效、耐受性和安全性,证实了该产品的临床价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Investigation Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Sodium Hyaluronate-Based Ophthalmical Viscosurgical Devices FIDIAL PLUS and IAL®-F in Cataract Surgery.

Purpose: To protect the corneal endothelium, various ophthalmical viscoelastic devices (OVDs) are used during cataract surgery. In this study, we compared two sodium hyaluronate-based OVD, the bacteria-derived FIDIAL PLUS OVD (test) with the animal-derived IAL®-F OVD (reference) during the surgical procedure. Methods: Fifty patients with bilateral cataract participated in the study: 50 eyes randomly received FIDIAL PLUS and 50 eyes received IAL®-F (ratio 1:1). Noninferior efficacy of FIDIAL PLUS compared with reference OVD (first objective) was evaluated using a paired t-test comparing the mean percent loss of corneal endothelial cells (CECs) with FIDIAL PLUS against the mean percent loss with IAL®-F. Corneal endothelial protection during cataract surgery with FIDIAL PLUS without significant (≥30 mmHg) postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) increase (main secondary objective) was assessed using a repeated measures logistic model comparing the incidence of significant postoperative IOP elevation between the two groups. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy were also evaluated by assessing secondary endpoints before and after surgery. Results: FIDIAL PLUS showed a statistically noninferior efficacy compared with IAL®-F; there was no significant increase in IOP in either group or different trends of the secondary endpoints were observed between the OVD groups. The safety profile was similar in both OVD groups and no adverse device effects were reported. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the equivalent efficacy, tolerability, and safety of the bacteria-derived FIDIAL PLUS compared with the animal-derived IAL®-F, confirming the clinical value of this product.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal that combines the fields of ophthalmology and pharmacology to enable optimal treatment and prevention of ocular diseases and disorders. The Journal delivers the latest discoveries in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of therapeutics for the treatment of ophthalmic disorders. Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics coverage includes: Glaucoma Cataracts Retinal degeneration Ocular infection, trauma, and toxicology Ocular drug delivery and biotransformation Ocular pharmacotherapy/clinical trials Ocular inflammatory and immune disorders Gene and cell-based therapies Ocular metabolic disorders Ocular ischemia and blood flow Proliferative disorders of the eye Eyes on Drug Discovery - written by Gary D. Novack, PhD, featuring the latest updates on drug and device pipeline developments as well as policy/regulatory changes by the FDA.
期刊最新文献
Duration of Bare Sclera Pterygium Surgery Combined with Mitomycin C with and Without Tranexamic Acid: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial. Preclinical and Clinical Pharmacokinetics of a New Preservative-Free Bimatoprost 0.01% Ophthalmic Gel to Treat Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension. Effects of Intense Pulsed Light on Presumed Neuropathic Pain Associated with Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Before-After Study. Eyes on New Product Development. Neuritin 1 Drives Therapeutic Preservation of Retinal Ganglion Cells in an Ex Vivo Human Glaucoma Model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1