P T Jacobson, B J Vilarello, C Snyder, T-H Choo, F F Caruana, L W Gallagher, J P Tervo, J B Gary, T M Saak, D A Gudis, P V Joseph, T E Goldberg, D P Devanand, J B Overdevest
{"title":"COVID-19 嗅觉功能障碍:应对方法、生活质量和心理健康之间的关联。","authors":"P T Jacobson, B J Vilarello, C Snyder, T-H Choo, F F Caruana, L W Gallagher, J P Tervo, J B Gary, T M Saak, D A Gudis, P V Joseph, T E Goldberg, D P Devanand, J B Overdevest","doi":"10.4193/Rhin23.356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persistent olfactory dysfunction (OD) is a common symptom following SARS-CoV-2 infection that can greatly impact quality of life (QoL). Because coping strategies have been shown to moderate the effect of disease symptoms on functional and affective outcomes, this study aims to determine whether specific coping strategies are associated with and moderate QoL outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Participants with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection underwent psychophysical olfactory testing with Sniffin’ Sticks and completed questionnaires to elicit subjective olfactory function, coping strategies, olfactory-specific QoL, general QoL, and mental health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 93 participants included in the study. Olfactory specific QoL scores were significantly worse among individuals with subjective and psychophysically measured OD compared to those with subjective and psychophysically confirmed normosmia. Olfactory-specific QoL, general QoL, and anxiety symptom scores were positively correlated with avoidant and disengagement coping among individuals with subjective and psychophysically measured OD. Depression symptom scores were positively correlated with avoidant and disengagement coping and negatively correlated with approach and engagement coping. There were no significant moderating effects on the association between olfactory performance and QoL or mental health screening assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Approach and engagement coping mechanisms are associated with improved depression, whereas avoidant and disengagement coping tracks with worse QoL and mental health screening assessment, offering an opportunity to counsel patients accordingly.</p>","PeriodicalId":21361,"journal":{"name":"Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":"526-536"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction: associations between coping, quality of life, and mental health.\",\"authors\":\"P T Jacobson, B J Vilarello, C Snyder, T-H Choo, F F Caruana, L W Gallagher, J P Tervo, J B Gary, T M Saak, D A Gudis, P V Joseph, T E Goldberg, D P Devanand, J B Overdevest\",\"doi\":\"10.4193/Rhin23.356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persistent olfactory dysfunction (OD) is a common symptom following SARS-CoV-2 infection that can greatly impact quality of life (QoL). Because coping strategies have been shown to moderate the effect of disease symptoms on functional and affective outcomes, this study aims to determine whether specific coping strategies are associated with and moderate QoL outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Participants with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection underwent psychophysical olfactory testing with Sniffin’ Sticks and completed questionnaires to elicit subjective olfactory function, coping strategies, olfactory-specific QoL, general QoL, and mental health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 93 participants included in the study. Olfactory specific QoL scores were significantly worse among individuals with subjective and psychophysically measured OD compared to those with subjective and psychophysically confirmed normosmia. Olfactory-specific QoL, general QoL, and anxiety symptom scores were positively correlated with avoidant and disengagement coping among individuals with subjective and psychophysically measured OD. Depression symptom scores were positively correlated with avoidant and disengagement coping and negatively correlated with approach and engagement coping. There were no significant moderating effects on the association between olfactory performance and QoL or mental health screening assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Approach and engagement coping mechanisms are associated with improved depression, whereas avoidant and disengagement coping tracks with worse QoL and mental health screening assessment, offering an opportunity to counsel patients accordingly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rhinology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"526-536\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rhinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin23.356\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin23.356","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:持续性嗅觉功能障碍(OD)是感染 SARS-CoV-2 后出现的一种常见症状,会严重影响生活质量(QoL)。由于应对策略已被证明能缓和疾病症状对功能和情感结果的影响,本研究旨在确定特定的应对策略是否与 QoL 结果相关并能缓和 QoL 结果:曾感染过 SARS-CoV-2 的参与者接受了嗅棒心理物理嗅觉测试,并填写了调查问卷,以了解主观嗅觉功能、应对策略、嗅觉特异性 QoL、一般 QoL 和心理健康情况:共有 93 人参与了研究。与主观和心理物理学证实的正常嗅觉症患者相比,主观和心理物理学测量的正常嗅觉症患者的嗅觉特异性 QoL 得分明显较低。在主观和心理物理测量的 OD 患者中,嗅觉特异性 QoL、一般 QoL 和焦虑症状得分与回避和脱离应对呈正相关。抑郁症状评分与回避和脱离应对呈正相关,与接近和参与应对呈负相关。嗅觉表现与 QoL 或心理健康筛查评估之间没有明显的调节作用:结论:接近型和参与型应对机制与抑郁症的改善有关,而回避型和脱离型应对机制则与更差的 QoL 和心理健康筛查评估有关,这为向患者提供相应的咨询提供了机会。
COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction: associations between coping, quality of life, and mental health.
Background: Persistent olfactory dysfunction (OD) is a common symptom following SARS-CoV-2 infection that can greatly impact quality of life (QoL). Because coping strategies have been shown to moderate the effect of disease symptoms on functional and affective outcomes, this study aims to determine whether specific coping strategies are associated with and moderate QoL outcomes.
Methodology: Participants with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection underwent psychophysical olfactory testing with Sniffin’ Sticks and completed questionnaires to elicit subjective olfactory function, coping strategies, olfactory-specific QoL, general QoL, and mental health.
Results: There were 93 participants included in the study. Olfactory specific QoL scores were significantly worse among individuals with subjective and psychophysically measured OD compared to those with subjective and psychophysically confirmed normosmia. Olfactory-specific QoL, general QoL, and anxiety symptom scores were positively correlated with avoidant and disengagement coping among individuals with subjective and psychophysically measured OD. Depression symptom scores were positively correlated with avoidant and disengagement coping and negatively correlated with approach and engagement coping. There were no significant moderating effects on the association between olfactory performance and QoL or mental health screening assessment.
Conclusions: Approach and engagement coping mechanisms are associated with improved depression, whereas avoidant and disengagement coping tracks with worse QoL and mental health screening assessment, offering an opportunity to counsel patients accordingly.
期刊介绍:
Rhinology serves as the official Journal of the International Rhinologic Society and is recognized as one of the journals of the European Rhinologic Society. It offers a prominent platform for disseminating rhinologic research, reviews, position papers, task force reports, and guidelines to an international scientific audience. The journal also boasts the prestigious European Position Paper in Rhinosinusitis (EPOS), a highly influential publication first released in 2005 and subsequently updated in 2007, 2012, and most recently in 2020.
Employing a double-blind peer review system, Rhinology welcomes original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor.