由护士协调对出院的体弱老年人进行干预的临床效果:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Clinical Nursing Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1111/jocn.17345
Kirsten J Parker, Julee Mcdonagh, Caleb Ferguson, Louise D Hickman
{"title":"由护士协调对出院的体弱老年人进行干预的临床效果:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Kirsten J Parker, Julee Mcdonagh, Caleb Ferguson, Louise D Hickman","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the effects of nurse-coordinated interventions in improving readmissions, cumulative hospital stay, mortality, functional ability and quality of life for frail older adults discharged from hospital.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review with meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search using key search terms of 'frailty', 'geriatric', 'hospital' and 'nurse'. Covidence was used to screen individual studies. Studies were included that addressed frail older adults, incorporated a significant nursing role in the intervention and were implemented during hospital admission with a focus on transition from hospital to home.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>This review searched MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), PubMed (EBSCO), Scopus, Embase (Ovid) and Cochrane library for studies published between 2000 and September 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 7945 abstracts screened, a total 16 randomised controlled trials were identified. The 16 randomised controlled trials had a total of 8795 participants, included in analysis. Due to the heterogeneity of the outcome measures used meta-analysis could only be completed on readmission (n = 13) and mortality (n = 9). All other remaining outcome measures were reported through narrative synthesis. A total of 59 different outcome measure assessments and tools were used between studies. Meta-analysis found statistically significant intervention effect at 1-month readmission only. No other statistically significant effects were found on any other time point or outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nurse-coordinated interventions have a significant effect on 1-month readmissions for frail older adults discharged from hospital. The positive effect of interventions on other health outcomes within studies were mixed and indistinct, this is attributed to the large heterogeneity between studies and outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>This review should inform policy around transitional care recommendations at local, national and international levels. Nurses, who constitute half of the global health workforce, are ideally situated to provide transitional care interventions. Nurse-coordinated models of care, which identify patient needs and facilitate the continuation of care into the community improve patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and/or patient care: </strong>Review findings will be useful for key stakeholders, clinicians and researchers to learn more about the essential elements of nurse-coordinated transitional care interventions that are best targeted to meet the needs of frail older adults.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>When frail older adults experience transitions in care, for example discharging from hospital to home, there is an increased risk of adverse events, such as institutionalisation, hospitalisation, disability and death. Nurse-coordinated transitional care models have shown to be a potential solution to support adults with specific chronic diseases, but there is more to be known about the effectiveness of interventions in frail older adults. This review demonstrated the positive impact of nurse-coordinated interventions in improving readmissions for up to 1 month post-discharge, helping to inform future transitional care interventions to better support the needs of frail older adults.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>This systematic review was reported in accordance with the Referred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No Patient or Public Contribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical outcomes of nurse-coordinated interventions for frail older adults discharged from hospital: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Kirsten J Parker, Julee Mcdonagh, Caleb Ferguson, Louise D Hickman\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jocn.17345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the effects of nurse-coordinated interventions in improving readmissions, cumulative hospital stay, mortality, functional ability and quality of life for frail older adults discharged from hospital.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review with meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search using key search terms of 'frailty', 'geriatric', 'hospital' and 'nurse'. Covidence was used to screen individual studies. Studies were included that addressed frail older adults, incorporated a significant nursing role in the intervention and were implemented during hospital admission with a focus on transition from hospital to home.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>This review searched MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), PubMed (EBSCO), Scopus, Embase (Ovid) and Cochrane library for studies published between 2000 and September 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 7945 abstracts screened, a total 16 randomised controlled trials were identified. The 16 randomised controlled trials had a total of 8795 participants, included in analysis. Due to the heterogeneity of the outcome measures used meta-analysis could only be completed on readmission (n = 13) and mortality (n = 9). All other remaining outcome measures were reported through narrative synthesis. A total of 59 different outcome measure assessments and tools were used between studies. Meta-analysis found statistically significant intervention effect at 1-month readmission only. No other statistically significant effects were found on any other time point or outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nurse-coordinated interventions have a significant effect on 1-month readmissions for frail older adults discharged from hospital. The positive effect of interventions on other health outcomes within studies were mixed and indistinct, this is attributed to the large heterogeneity between studies and outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>This review should inform policy around transitional care recommendations at local, national and international levels. Nurses, who constitute half of the global health workforce, are ideally situated to provide transitional care interventions. Nurse-coordinated models of care, which identify patient needs and facilitate the continuation of care into the community improve patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and/or patient care: </strong>Review findings will be useful for key stakeholders, clinicians and researchers to learn more about the essential elements of nurse-coordinated transitional care interventions that are best targeted to meet the needs of frail older adults.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>When frail older adults experience transitions in care, for example discharging from hospital to home, there is an increased risk of adverse events, such as institutionalisation, hospitalisation, disability and death. Nurse-coordinated transitional care models have shown to be a potential solution to support adults with specific chronic diseases, but there is more to be known about the effectiveness of interventions in frail older adults. This review demonstrated the positive impact of nurse-coordinated interventions in improving readmissions for up to 1 month post-discharge, helping to inform future transitional care interventions to better support the needs of frail older adults.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>This systematic review was reported in accordance with the Referred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No Patient or Public Contribution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17345\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17345","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定护士协调干预对改善体弱老年人出院后的再入院率、累计住院时间、死亡率、功能能力和生活质量的影响:设计:系统回顾与荟萃分析:方法:使用 "虚弱"、"老年病"、"医院 "和 "护士 "等关键检索词进行系统检索。使用 "证据 "筛选个别研究。数据来源:本综述检索了 MEDLIN、SCI、CSSCI、SCI、SCI、SCI、SCI、SCI、SCI、SCI、SCI、SCI、SCI、SCI、SCI、SCI 等文献:本综述检索了 MEDLINE (Ovid)、CINAHL (EBSCO)、PubMed (EBSCO)、Scopus、Embase (Ovid) 和 Cochrane 图书馆中 2000 年至 2023 年 9 月间发表的研究:在筛选出的 7945 篇摘要中,共确定了 16 项随机对照试验。这 16 项随机对照试验共有 8795 名参与者参与分析。由于所采用的结果测量存在异质性,因此只能对再入院(13 例)和死亡率(9 例)进行荟萃分析。其余所有结果指标均通过叙述性综合报告。各项研究共使用了 59 种不同的结果测量评估方法和工具。Meta 分析发现,仅在 1 个月再入院方面的干预效果具有统计学意义。其他时间点或结果均未发现有统计学意义的效果:护士协调干预对体弱老年人出院 1 个月后再入院有显著效果。各项研究中,干预措施对其他健康结果的积极影响参差不齐且不明确,这归因于各项研究和结果测量之间存在较大的异质性:本综述应为地方、国家和国际层面有关过渡性护理建议的政策提供参考。护士占全球医疗队伍的一半,是提供过渡性护理干预的理想人选。由护士协调的护理模式可以确定患者的需求,并促进将护理延续到社区,从而改善患者的预后:评审结果将有助于主要利益相关者、临床医生和研究人员更多地了解护士协调的过渡护理干预措施的基本要素,这些干预措施最能满足体弱老年人的需求:当身体虚弱的老年人经历护理过渡时,例如从医院出院回家,发生不良事件的风险就会增加,例如入院、住院、残疾和死亡。护士协调的过渡护理模式已被证明是一种潜在的解决方案,可为患有特定慢性疾病的成年人提供支持,但对于体弱老年人的干预效果还有待进一步了解。本综述表明,护士协调干预对改善出院后 1 个月内的再入院情况有积极影响,有助于为未来的过渡性护理干预提供信息,以更好地支持体弱老年人的需求:本系统综述按照《系统综述和荟萃分析参考报告项目》(PRISMA)指南进行报告:无患者或公众贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical outcomes of nurse-coordinated interventions for frail older adults discharged from hospital: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aim: To determine the effects of nurse-coordinated interventions in improving readmissions, cumulative hospital stay, mortality, functional ability and quality of life for frail older adults discharged from hospital.

Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis.

Methods: A systematic search using key search terms of 'frailty', 'geriatric', 'hospital' and 'nurse'. Covidence was used to screen individual studies. Studies were included that addressed frail older adults, incorporated a significant nursing role in the intervention and were implemented during hospital admission with a focus on transition from hospital to home.

Data sources: This review searched MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), PubMed (EBSCO), Scopus, Embase (Ovid) and Cochrane library for studies published between 2000 and September 2023.

Results: Of 7945 abstracts screened, a total 16 randomised controlled trials were identified. The 16 randomised controlled trials had a total of 8795 participants, included in analysis. Due to the heterogeneity of the outcome measures used meta-analysis could only be completed on readmission (n = 13) and mortality (n = 9). All other remaining outcome measures were reported through narrative synthesis. A total of 59 different outcome measure assessments and tools were used between studies. Meta-analysis found statistically significant intervention effect at 1-month readmission only. No other statistically significant effects were found on any other time point or outcome.

Conclusion: Nurse-coordinated interventions have a significant effect on 1-month readmissions for frail older adults discharged from hospital. The positive effect of interventions on other health outcomes within studies were mixed and indistinct, this is attributed to the large heterogeneity between studies and outcome measures.

Relevance to clinical practice: This review should inform policy around transitional care recommendations at local, national and international levels. Nurses, who constitute half of the global health workforce, are ideally situated to provide transitional care interventions. Nurse-coordinated models of care, which identify patient needs and facilitate the continuation of care into the community improve patient outcomes.

Implications for the profession and/or patient care: Review findings will be useful for key stakeholders, clinicians and researchers to learn more about the essential elements of nurse-coordinated transitional care interventions that are best targeted to meet the needs of frail older adults.

Impact: When frail older adults experience transitions in care, for example discharging from hospital to home, there is an increased risk of adverse events, such as institutionalisation, hospitalisation, disability and death. Nurse-coordinated transitional care models have shown to be a potential solution to support adults with specific chronic diseases, but there is more to be known about the effectiveness of interventions in frail older adults. This review demonstrated the positive impact of nurse-coordinated interventions in improving readmissions for up to 1 month post-discharge, helping to inform future transitional care interventions to better support the needs of frail older adults.

Reporting method: This systematic review was reported in accordance with the Referred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

Patient or public contribution: No Patient or Public Contribution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
期刊最新文献
'Towards a conceptualization of nurses' support of hospitalised patients' self-management-A modified Delphi study'. "But what do you really think?" Nurses' contrasting explicit and implicit attitudes towards people with disabilities using the implicit association test. Nursing standards, language and age as variables associated with clinical competence for nurses in long-term care facilities: A cross-sectional study. Factors related to nurses' beliefs regarding pain assessment in people living with dementia. Factors related to preoperative anxiety in older patients with sensory impairment: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1