分析足球比赛的短跑距离:基于 GPS 的绝对阈值和相对阈值的比较。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Biology of Sport Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-07 DOI:10.5114/biolsport.2024.133663
Hugo Silva, Fábio Yuzo Nakamura, Irineu Loturco, João Ribeiro, Rui Marcelino
{"title":"分析足球比赛的短跑距离:基于 GPS 的绝对阈值和相对阈值的比较。","authors":"Hugo Silva, Fábio Yuzo Nakamura, Irineu Loturco, João Ribeiro, Rui Marcelino","doi":"10.5114/biolsport.2024.133663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compared the most common absolute sprint threshold (> 25.2 km/h) with relative and individualized thresholds (> 70%, > 75%, > 80%, > 85% and > 90% of peak match speed). Twenty elite soccer players, competing in the first division of the Portuguese League, were monitored using GNSS equipment during thirty-four official matches. Peak match speed was retrieved as the individual maximal speed reached during the full season. Distances were registered when speed overcame the absolute and the relative thresholds. Mean ± SD of peak speeds and distances covered were calculated, and Pearson correlation (<i>r</i>) and mean paired differences were performed to analyze relationships and differences between thresholds. The peak match speed was 32.9 ± 1.4 km/h. Correlations between distances covered using the absolute and relative thresholds varied from very strong (> 70%: <i>r</i> = 0.84, <i>p</i> < .001; > 75%: <i>r</i> = 0.89, <i>p</i> < .001; and > 80%: <i>r</i> = 0.88, <i>p</i> < .001), strong (> 85%: <i>r</i> = 0.79, <i>p</i> < .001), to moderate (> 90%: <i>r</i> = 0.59, <i>p</i> < .001). Overall, the > 75% (ES: 0.23 [95% CI: 0.16, 0.31]) and the > 90% (ES: -1.65 [95%CI: -1.85, -1.48]) relative thresholds presented the smallest and largest differences, respectively, with the absolute threshold. Differences were also found when considering the playing positions. While the distances covered by central midfielders were similar between the absolute and > 80% thresholds (-0.03 [-0.16, 0.10]), fullbacks covered largely more distance -1.88 [-2.42 -1.50]) in the absolute threshold than in the > 80% threshold. The distances covered by players varied based on the selected threshold, affecting the distances covered by different playing positions. Being the highest speed threshold within displacements thresholds, the absolute sprint threshold showed greater similarity to lower rather than higher relative thresholds.</p>","PeriodicalId":55365,"journal":{"name":"Biology of Sport","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11167479/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing soccer match sprint distances: A comparison of GPS-based absolute and relative thresholds.\",\"authors\":\"Hugo Silva, Fábio Yuzo Nakamura, Irineu Loturco, João Ribeiro, Rui Marcelino\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/biolsport.2024.133663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study compared the most common absolute sprint threshold (> 25.2 km/h) with relative and individualized thresholds (> 70%, > 75%, > 80%, > 85% and > 90% of peak match speed). Twenty elite soccer players, competing in the first division of the Portuguese League, were monitored using GNSS equipment during thirty-four official matches. Peak match speed was retrieved as the individual maximal speed reached during the full season. Distances were registered when speed overcame the absolute and the relative thresholds. Mean ± SD of peak speeds and distances covered were calculated, and Pearson correlation (<i>r</i>) and mean paired differences were performed to analyze relationships and differences between thresholds. The peak match speed was 32.9 ± 1.4 km/h. Correlations between distances covered using the absolute and relative thresholds varied from very strong (> 70%: <i>r</i> = 0.84, <i>p</i> < .001; > 75%: <i>r</i> = 0.89, <i>p</i> < .001; and > 80%: <i>r</i> = 0.88, <i>p</i> < .001), strong (> 85%: <i>r</i> = 0.79, <i>p</i> < .001), to moderate (> 90%: <i>r</i> = 0.59, <i>p</i> < .001). Overall, the > 75% (ES: 0.23 [95% CI: 0.16, 0.31]) and the > 90% (ES: -1.65 [95%CI: -1.85, -1.48]) relative thresholds presented the smallest and largest differences, respectively, with the absolute threshold. Differences were also found when considering the playing positions. While the distances covered by central midfielders were similar between the absolute and > 80% thresholds (-0.03 [-0.16, 0.10]), fullbacks covered largely more distance -1.88 [-2.42 -1.50]) in the absolute threshold than in the > 80% threshold. The distances covered by players varied based on the selected threshold, affecting the distances covered by different playing positions. Being the highest speed threshold within displacements thresholds, the absolute sprint threshold showed greater similarity to lower rather than higher relative thresholds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biology of Sport\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11167479/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biology of Sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2024.133663\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology of Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2024.133663","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究将最常见的绝对冲刺阈值(> 25.2 公里/小时)与相对阈值和个性化阈值(> 70%、> 75%、> 80%、> 85% 和> 90% 的比赛峰值速度)进行了比较。在 34 场正式比赛中,使用全球导航卫星系统设备对参加葡萄牙甲级联赛的 20 名精英足球运动员进行了监测。比赛峰值速度是整个赛季中个人达到的最大速度。当速度超过绝对阈值和相对阈值时,则记录距离。计算了峰值速度和距离的平均值(± SD),并通过皮尔逊相关性(r)和平均配对差异来分析阈值之间的关系和差异。峰值匹配速度为 32.9 ± 1.4 km/h。使用绝对阈值和相对阈值所覆盖距离之间的相关性从非常强(> 70%:r = 0.84,p < .001;> 75%:r = 0.89,p < .001;> 80%:r = 0.88,p < .001)、强(> 85%:r = 0.79,p < .001)到中等(> 90%:r = 0.59,p < .001)不等。总体而言,相对阈值 > 75% (ES: 0.23 [95%CI: 0.16, 0.31])和 > 90% (ES: -1.65 [95%CI: -1.85, -1.48]) 与绝对阈值的差异分别最小和最大。在考虑比赛位置时也发现了差异。中场球员在绝对临界值和大于 80% 临界值时的覆盖距离相似(-0.03 [-0.16, 0.10]),而后卫在绝对临界值时的覆盖距离要比大于 80% 临界值时的覆盖距离大得多(-1.88 [-2.42 -1.50] )。根据所选临界值的不同,球员的覆盖距离也不同,这影响了不同位置球员的覆盖距离。作为位移阈值中最高的速度阈值,绝对冲刺阈值与较低而非较高的相对阈值有更大的相似性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analyzing soccer match sprint distances: A comparison of GPS-based absolute and relative thresholds.

This study compared the most common absolute sprint threshold (> 25.2 km/h) with relative and individualized thresholds (> 70%, > 75%, > 80%, > 85% and > 90% of peak match speed). Twenty elite soccer players, competing in the first division of the Portuguese League, were monitored using GNSS equipment during thirty-four official matches. Peak match speed was retrieved as the individual maximal speed reached during the full season. Distances were registered when speed overcame the absolute and the relative thresholds. Mean ± SD of peak speeds and distances covered were calculated, and Pearson correlation (r) and mean paired differences were performed to analyze relationships and differences between thresholds. The peak match speed was 32.9 ± 1.4 km/h. Correlations between distances covered using the absolute and relative thresholds varied from very strong (> 70%: r = 0.84, p < .001; > 75%: r = 0.89, p < .001; and > 80%: r = 0.88, p < .001), strong (> 85%: r = 0.79, p < .001), to moderate (> 90%: r = 0.59, p < .001). Overall, the > 75% (ES: 0.23 [95% CI: 0.16, 0.31]) and the > 90% (ES: -1.65 [95%CI: -1.85, -1.48]) relative thresholds presented the smallest and largest differences, respectively, with the absolute threshold. Differences were also found when considering the playing positions. While the distances covered by central midfielders were similar between the absolute and > 80% thresholds (-0.03 [-0.16, 0.10]), fullbacks covered largely more distance -1.88 [-2.42 -1.50]) in the absolute threshold than in the > 80% threshold. The distances covered by players varied based on the selected threshold, affecting the distances covered by different playing positions. Being the highest speed threshold within displacements thresholds, the absolute sprint threshold showed greater similarity to lower rather than higher relative thresholds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biology of Sport
Biology of Sport 生物-运动科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
113
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biology of Sport is the official journal of the Institute of Sport in Warsaw, Poland, published since 1984. Biology of Sport is an international scientific peer-reviewed journal, published quarterly in both paper and electronic format. The journal publishes articles concerning basic and applied sciences in sport: sports and exercise physiology, sports immunology and medicine, sports genetics, training and testing, pharmacology, as well as in other biological aspects related to sport. Priority is given to inter-disciplinary papers.
期刊最新文献
Effects of plyometric-based structured game active breaks on fundamental movement skills, muscular fitness, self-perception, and actual behaviour in primary school students. Effects of recreational team sports on the metabolic health, body composition and physical fitness parameters of overweight and obese populations: A systematic review. Exploring sex differences in blood-based biomarkers following exhaustive exercise using bioinformatics analysis. Gut microbiota and physical activity level: characterization from sedentary to soccer players. Injury incidence and characteristics in adolescent female football players: A systematic review with meta-analysis of prospective studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1