{"title":"重新审视印度拉贾斯坦邦楝树卡塔纳区的考古学","authors":"Esha Prasad , Shweta Sinha Deshpande","doi":"10.1016/j.ara.2024.100538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An archaeological reconnaissance and survey with a site census was carried out in the Neem ka Thana <em>tehsil</em> Rajasthan using the village-to-village survey method in the years 2020–2022. The study aimed to revisit the already documented sites, identify and document new sites, and salvage cultural material from destroyed or damaged sites due to increasing agricultural and development activities. Neem ka Thana <em>tehsil</em> has been previously explored and these explorations have reported archaeological sites affiliated to the Palaeolithic, Chalcolithic, Early Historic, Historic, and Medieval periods, with the majority of sites (88) belonging to the Chalcolithic Ganeshwar-Jodhpura Culture Complex (GJCC). This heavy concentration of sites in such a small geographical area raises questions about the distribution pattern and nature of the sites. The current study discusses the results of the survey along with new insights about the cultural affiliations of both, the newly discovered and previously reported sites and contributes to the existing literature by raising questions on the nature and identity of the sites reported and recommends further study. Several new ideas with regard to the nature of the archaeological material in the region such as possible association with the Rangmahal Culture and iron ore are also discussed. The study also contributes to the conversation on methodology during the process of exploration and salvage archaeology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relooking at the Archaeology of Neem ka Thana tehsil, Rajasthan, India\",\"authors\":\"Esha Prasad , Shweta Sinha Deshpande\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ara.2024.100538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>An archaeological reconnaissance and survey with a site census was carried out in the Neem ka Thana <em>tehsil</em> Rajasthan using the village-to-village survey method in the years 2020–2022. The study aimed to revisit the already documented sites, identify and document new sites, and salvage cultural material from destroyed or damaged sites due to increasing agricultural and development activities. Neem ka Thana <em>tehsil</em> has been previously explored and these explorations have reported archaeological sites affiliated to the Palaeolithic, Chalcolithic, Early Historic, Historic, and Medieval periods, with the majority of sites (88) belonging to the Chalcolithic Ganeshwar-Jodhpura Culture Complex (GJCC). This heavy concentration of sites in such a small geographical area raises questions about the distribution pattern and nature of the sites. The current study discusses the results of the survey along with new insights about the cultural affiliations of both, the newly discovered and previously reported sites and contributes to the existing literature by raising questions on the nature and identity of the sites reported and recommends further study. Several new ideas with regard to the nature of the archaeological material in the region such as possible association with the Rangmahal Culture and iron ore are also discussed. The study also contributes to the conversation on methodology during the process of exploration and salvage archaeology.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352226724000394\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352226724000394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
2020 至 2022 年期间,在拉贾斯坦邦的尼姆卡塔纳区采用逐村调查的方法进行了考古勘察和遗址普查。这项研究的目的是重新考察已经记录在案的遗址,确定和记录新的遗址,并从因农业和发展活动日益增多而被破坏或损毁的遗址中抢救文化材料。Neem ka Thana 村以前曾进行过勘探,这些勘探报告了旧石器时代、旧石器时代、早期历史时期、历史时期和中世纪时期的考古遗址,其中大多数遗址(88 处)属于旧石器时代的 Ganeshwar-Jodhpura 文化复合体(GJCC)。遗址如此集中地分布在如此狭小的地域内,不禁让人对遗址的分布模式和性质产生疑问。本研究讨论了调查的结果以及对新发现遗址和以前报告的遗址的文化归属的新见解,并对报告遗址的性质和身份提出了疑问,建议进一步研究,从而为现有文献做出了贡献。此外,还讨论了有关该地区考古材料性质的一些新观点,如可能与朗马哈尔文化和铁矿石有关。本研究还有助于探讨勘探和抢救性考古过程中的方法问题。
Relooking at the Archaeology of Neem ka Thana tehsil, Rajasthan, India
An archaeological reconnaissance and survey with a site census was carried out in the Neem ka Thana tehsil Rajasthan using the village-to-village survey method in the years 2020–2022. The study aimed to revisit the already documented sites, identify and document new sites, and salvage cultural material from destroyed or damaged sites due to increasing agricultural and development activities. Neem ka Thana tehsil has been previously explored and these explorations have reported archaeological sites affiliated to the Palaeolithic, Chalcolithic, Early Historic, Historic, and Medieval periods, with the majority of sites (88) belonging to the Chalcolithic Ganeshwar-Jodhpura Culture Complex (GJCC). This heavy concentration of sites in such a small geographical area raises questions about the distribution pattern and nature of the sites. The current study discusses the results of the survey along with new insights about the cultural affiliations of both, the newly discovered and previously reported sites and contributes to the existing literature by raising questions on the nature and identity of the sites reported and recommends further study. Several new ideas with regard to the nature of the archaeological material in the region such as possible association with the Rangmahal Culture and iron ore are also discussed. The study also contributes to the conversation on methodology during the process of exploration and salvage archaeology.