{"title":"加强汽车损坏维修成本预测:将本体推理与回归模型相结合","authors":"Hamid Ahaggach , Lylia Abrouk , Eric Lebon","doi":"10.1016/j.iswa.2024.200411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The estimation of repair costs for car damage is a critical yet challenging task for insurance companies and repair shops. Accurate and the rapid predictions are essential for providing reliable cost estimates to customers. Traditional methods in this domain face multiple challenges, including manual processes and inaccuracies in repair cost estimation, as outlined in our article.</p><p>This paper introduces a novel approach that combines regression models with ontology reasoning to enhance the accuracy of car damage repair cost predictions. An Ontology for Car Damage (OCD)<span><sup>1</sup></span> <span><math><msup><mrow></mrow><mrow><mo>,</mo></mrow></msup></math></span><span><sup>2</sup></span> has been developed, which is meticulously structured and populated using Named Entity Recognition (NER) and Relation Extraction (RE) techniques. This ontology provides a comprehensive framework for organizing and understanding the complex domain of car damage, capturing essential semantic relationships and variables that significantly influence repair costs. By integrating OCD with seven regression models, such as Random Forest and Decision Tree, we have proposed a hybrid methodology that leverages both structured data and semantic understanding. Our approach not only accounts for typical variables such as the type and severity of damage, and labor costs but also identifies novel features through the use of SWRL (Semantic Web Rule Language) rules, enhancing the model’s predictive capabilities.</p><p>The performance of our models was evaluated using a substantial real-world dataset comprising over 300,000 records. This evaluation used metrics such as mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and R-squared. The results indicate that our hybrid approach, which incorporates ontology reasoning, significantly outperforms traditional regression models.</p><p>The Random Forest model, especially when combined with the OCD ontology, showcased superior performance, exhibiting a minimal average deviation from the actual repair costs and achieving a low MAE.</p><p>This study’s findings demonstrate the potential of combining ontology reasoning with machine learning techniques for precise cost prediction in the automotive repair industry. Our methodology offers a robust tool for insurance companies and repair shops to generate more accurate, reliable, and automated cost estimates, ultimately benefiting both businesses and customers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100684,"journal":{"name":"Intelligent Systems with Applications","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 200411"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667305324000851/pdfft?md5=916ac2f680856619faeba46e7af9b09c&pid=1-s2.0-S2667305324000851-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing car damage repair cost prediction: Integrating ontology reasoning with regression models\",\"authors\":\"Hamid Ahaggach , Lylia Abrouk , Eric Lebon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iswa.2024.200411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The estimation of repair costs for car damage is a critical yet challenging task for insurance companies and repair shops. Accurate and the rapid predictions are essential for providing reliable cost estimates to customers. Traditional methods in this domain face multiple challenges, including manual processes and inaccuracies in repair cost estimation, as outlined in our article.</p><p>This paper introduces a novel approach that combines regression models with ontology reasoning to enhance the accuracy of car damage repair cost predictions. An Ontology for Car Damage (OCD)<span><sup>1</sup></span> <span><math><msup><mrow></mrow><mrow><mo>,</mo></mrow></msup></math></span><span><sup>2</sup></span> has been developed, which is meticulously structured and populated using Named Entity Recognition (NER) and Relation Extraction (RE) techniques. This ontology provides a comprehensive framework for organizing and understanding the complex domain of car damage, capturing essential semantic relationships and variables that significantly influence repair costs. By integrating OCD with seven regression models, such as Random Forest and Decision Tree, we have proposed a hybrid methodology that leverages both structured data and semantic understanding. Our approach not only accounts for typical variables such as the type and severity of damage, and labor costs but also identifies novel features through the use of SWRL (Semantic Web Rule Language) rules, enhancing the model’s predictive capabilities.</p><p>The performance of our models was evaluated using a substantial real-world dataset comprising over 300,000 records. This evaluation used metrics such as mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and R-squared. The results indicate that our hybrid approach, which incorporates ontology reasoning, significantly outperforms traditional regression models.</p><p>The Random Forest model, especially when combined with the OCD ontology, showcased superior performance, exhibiting a minimal average deviation from the actual repair costs and achieving a low MAE.</p><p>This study’s findings demonstrate the potential of combining ontology reasoning with machine learning techniques for precise cost prediction in the automotive repair industry. Our methodology offers a robust tool for insurance companies and repair shops to generate more accurate, reliable, and automated cost estimates, ultimately benefiting both businesses and customers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intelligent Systems with Applications\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"Article 200411\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667305324000851/pdfft?md5=916ac2f680856619faeba46e7af9b09c&pid=1-s2.0-S2667305324000851-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intelligent Systems with Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667305324000851\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligent Systems with Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667305324000851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
对于保险公司和修理厂来说,估算汽车损坏的维修成本是一项至关重要但又极具挑战性的任务。准确、快速的预测对于向客户提供可靠的成本估算至关重要。本文介绍了一种结合回归模型和本体推理的新方法,以提高汽车损坏维修成本预测的准确性。我们开发了一个汽车损坏本体(OCD)1,2,该本体采用命名实体识别(NER)和关系提取(RE)技术精心构建和填充。该本体为组织和理解复杂的汽车损坏领域提供了一个综合框架,捕捉了重要的语义关系和对维修成本有重大影响的变量。通过将 OCD 与随机森林和决策树等七个回归模型相结合,我们提出了一种混合方法,既能利用结构化数据,又能理解语义。我们的方法不仅考虑了损坏类型和严重程度以及人工成本等典型变量,还通过使用 SWRL(语义网络规则语言)规则识别了新特征,从而增强了模型的预测能力。评估使用了平均绝对误差(MAE)、均方根误差(RMSE)和 R 平方等指标。结果表明,我们结合本体推理的混合方法明显优于传统回归模型。随机森林模型,尤其是与 OCD 本体相结合时,表现出卓越的性能,与实际维修成本的平均偏差极小,MAE 较低。我们的方法为保险公司和修理厂提供了一种强大的工具,可用于生成更准确、可靠和自动化的成本估算,最终使企业和客户受益。
Enhancing car damage repair cost prediction: Integrating ontology reasoning with regression models
The estimation of repair costs for car damage is a critical yet challenging task for insurance companies and repair shops. Accurate and the rapid predictions are essential for providing reliable cost estimates to customers. Traditional methods in this domain face multiple challenges, including manual processes and inaccuracies in repair cost estimation, as outlined in our article.
This paper introduces a novel approach that combines regression models with ontology reasoning to enhance the accuracy of car damage repair cost predictions. An Ontology for Car Damage (OCD)12 has been developed, which is meticulously structured and populated using Named Entity Recognition (NER) and Relation Extraction (RE) techniques. This ontology provides a comprehensive framework for organizing and understanding the complex domain of car damage, capturing essential semantic relationships and variables that significantly influence repair costs. By integrating OCD with seven regression models, such as Random Forest and Decision Tree, we have proposed a hybrid methodology that leverages both structured data and semantic understanding. Our approach not only accounts for typical variables such as the type and severity of damage, and labor costs but also identifies novel features through the use of SWRL (Semantic Web Rule Language) rules, enhancing the model’s predictive capabilities.
The performance of our models was evaluated using a substantial real-world dataset comprising over 300,000 records. This evaluation used metrics such as mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and R-squared. The results indicate that our hybrid approach, which incorporates ontology reasoning, significantly outperforms traditional regression models.
The Random Forest model, especially when combined with the OCD ontology, showcased superior performance, exhibiting a minimal average deviation from the actual repair costs and achieving a low MAE.
This study’s findings demonstrate the potential of combining ontology reasoning with machine learning techniques for precise cost prediction in the automotive repair industry. Our methodology offers a robust tool for insurance companies and repair shops to generate more accurate, reliable, and automated cost estimates, ultimately benefiting both businesses and customers.