美国主流英语中的语音实施和下音阶解释

IF 1.9 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Journal of Phonetics Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.wocn.2024.101340
Jill C. Thorson, Rachel Steindel Burdin
{"title":"美国主流英语中的语音实施和下音阶解释","authors":"Jill C. Thorson,&nbsp;Rachel Steindel Burdin","doi":"10.1016/j.wocn.2024.101340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study explores downstepping in Mainstream US English using three experiments. Experiment 1 investigated if downstep was associated with accessible referents. Pairs of scenarios were constructed: one with <em>new</em> information and one with <em>accessible</em>. Two versions of the target utterances were recorded (one with high star, and one with downstepping) and presented in the <em>accessible</em> and <em>new</em> contexts. The high star contour was preferred overall, but less so in <em>accessible</em> contexts. A statistical model showed an effect of the phonetic implementation of the contour. Experiment 2 examined the phonetic realizations of the utterances in Experiment 1 using a categorical perception discrimination task. Participants showed linear perception within the downstep contours but a categorical difference between the high star and downstep contours. Experiment 3 explored the interpretations attached to downstepping. Listeners showed a categorical difference between high star and downstep contours for interpretation, hearing downstep as indicating something had happened before, and more resigned, disappointed, and less clear than high star contours. There was also variation within the downstep contours based on phonetic implementation of the contour. We show that downstep contours have distinct meanings from high star contours, and that these meanings may be mediated by their phonetic implementation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Phonetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phonetic implementation and the interpretation of downstepping in Mainstream US English\",\"authors\":\"Jill C. Thorson,&nbsp;Rachel Steindel Burdin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wocn.2024.101340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study explores downstepping in Mainstream US English using three experiments. Experiment 1 investigated if downstep was associated with accessible referents. Pairs of scenarios were constructed: one with <em>new</em> information and one with <em>accessible</em>. Two versions of the target utterances were recorded (one with high star, and one with downstepping) and presented in the <em>accessible</em> and <em>new</em> contexts. The high star contour was preferred overall, but less so in <em>accessible</em> contexts. A statistical model showed an effect of the phonetic implementation of the contour. Experiment 2 examined the phonetic realizations of the utterances in Experiment 1 using a categorical perception discrimination task. Participants showed linear perception within the downstep contours but a categorical difference between the high star and downstep contours. Experiment 3 explored the interpretations attached to downstepping. Listeners showed a categorical difference between high star and downstep contours for interpretation, hearing downstep as indicating something had happened before, and more resigned, disappointed, and less clear than high star contours. There was also variation within the downstep contours based on phonetic implementation of the contour. We show that downstep contours have distinct meanings from high star contours, and that these meanings may be mediated by their phonetic implementation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Phonetics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Phonetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095447024000469\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Phonetics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095447024000469","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过三个实验探讨了美国主流英语中的下踩现象。实验 1 调查了下踩是否与可获得的指代相关联。实验构建了两对情景:一个是新信息情景,一个是无障碍情景。实验中记录了两个版本的目标语(一个是高星轮廓,一个是下踩轮廓),并分别在无障碍和新语境中呈现。总体而言,高星轮廓更受青睐,但在无障碍语境中则不那么受欢迎。统计模型显示,等高线的语音实现会产生影响。实验 2 采用分类感知辨别任务对实验 1 中的语音实现进行了检验。受试者在下台阶轮廓内表现出线性感知,但在高星轮廓和下台阶轮廓之间表现出分类差异。实验 3 探讨了对下音阶的解释。听者对高星轮廓和下台阶轮廓的解释出现了分类差异,听者认为下台阶表示之前发生的事情,比高星轮廓更无奈、更失望、更不清晰。根据等值线的语音实现,下音阶等值线内部也存在差异。我们的研究表明,下音阶等值线与高星级等值线具有不同的含义,而这些含义可能是以其语音实现为中介的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Phonetic implementation and the interpretation of downstepping in Mainstream US English

This study explores downstepping in Mainstream US English using three experiments. Experiment 1 investigated if downstep was associated with accessible referents. Pairs of scenarios were constructed: one with new information and one with accessible. Two versions of the target utterances were recorded (one with high star, and one with downstepping) and presented in the accessible and new contexts. The high star contour was preferred overall, but less so in accessible contexts. A statistical model showed an effect of the phonetic implementation of the contour. Experiment 2 examined the phonetic realizations of the utterances in Experiment 1 using a categorical perception discrimination task. Participants showed linear perception within the downstep contours but a categorical difference between the high star and downstep contours. Experiment 3 explored the interpretations attached to downstepping. Listeners showed a categorical difference between high star and downstep contours for interpretation, hearing downstep as indicating something had happened before, and more resigned, disappointed, and less clear than high star contours. There was also variation within the downstep contours based on phonetic implementation of the contour. We show that downstep contours have distinct meanings from high star contours, and that these meanings may be mediated by their phonetic implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
26.30%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The Journal of Phonetics publishes papers of an experimental or theoretical nature that deal with phonetic aspects of language and linguistic communication processes. Papers dealing with technological and/or pathological topics, or papers of an interdisciplinary nature are also suitable, provided that linguistic-phonetic principles underlie the work reported. Regular articles, review articles, and letters to the editor are published. Themed issues are also published, devoted entirely to a specific subject of interest within the field of phonetics.
期刊最新文献
Talker variability versus variability of vowel context in training naïve learners on an unfamiliar class of foreign language contrasts Effects of syllable position and place of articulation on secondary dorsal contrasts: An ultrasound study of Irish On the target of phonetic convergence: Acoustic and linguistic aspects of pitch accent imitation Effects of word-level structure on oral stop realization in Hawaiian Lexically-guided perceptual recalibration from acoustically unambiguous input in second language learners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1