利用卷积神经网络评估临床皮肤图像的质量

Hyeon Ki Jeong , Christine Park , Simon W. Jiang , Matilda Nicholas , Suephy Chen , Ricardo Henao , Meenal Kheterpal
{"title":"利用卷积神经网络评估临床皮肤图像的质量","authors":"Hyeon Ki Jeong ,&nbsp;Christine Park ,&nbsp;Simon W. Jiang ,&nbsp;Matilda Nicholas ,&nbsp;Suephy Chen ,&nbsp;Ricardo Henao ,&nbsp;Meenal Kheterpal","doi":"10.1016/j.xjidi.2024.100285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The image quality received for clinical evaluation is often suboptimal. The goal is to develop an image quality analysis tool to assess patient- and primary care physician–derived images using deep learning model. Dataset included patient- and primary care physician–derived images from August 21, 2018 to June 30, 2022 with 4 unique quality labels. VGG16 model was fine tuned with input data, and optimal threshold was determined by Youden’s index. Ordinal labels were transformed to binary labels using a majority vote because model distinguishes between 2 categories (good vs bad). At a threshold of 0.587, area under the curve for the test set was 0.885 (95% confidence interval = 0.838–0.933); sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 0.829, 0.784, 0.906, and 0.645, respectively. Independent validation of 300 additional images (from patients and primary care physicians) demonstrated area under the curve of 0.864 (95% confidence interval = 0.818–0.909) and area under the curve of 0.902 (95% confidence interval = 0.85–0.95), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the 300 images were 0.827, 0.800, 0.959, and 0.450, respectively. We demonstrate a practical approach improving the image quality for clinical workflow. Although users may have to capture additional images, this is offset by the improved workload and efficiency for clinical teams.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73548,"journal":{"name":"JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health","volume":"4 4","pages":"Article 100285"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667026724000328/pdfft?md5=3096c45a51c4538d05749966b424a85b&pid=1-s2.0-S2667026724000328-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Image Quality Assessment Using Convolutional Neural Network in Clinical Skin Images\",\"authors\":\"Hyeon Ki Jeong ,&nbsp;Christine Park ,&nbsp;Simon W. Jiang ,&nbsp;Matilda Nicholas ,&nbsp;Suephy Chen ,&nbsp;Ricardo Henao ,&nbsp;Meenal Kheterpal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xjidi.2024.100285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The image quality received for clinical evaluation is often suboptimal. The goal is to develop an image quality analysis tool to assess patient- and primary care physician–derived images using deep learning model. Dataset included patient- and primary care physician–derived images from August 21, 2018 to June 30, 2022 with 4 unique quality labels. VGG16 model was fine tuned with input data, and optimal threshold was determined by Youden’s index. Ordinal labels were transformed to binary labels using a majority vote because model distinguishes between 2 categories (good vs bad). At a threshold of 0.587, area under the curve for the test set was 0.885 (95% confidence interval = 0.838–0.933); sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 0.829, 0.784, 0.906, and 0.645, respectively. Independent validation of 300 additional images (from patients and primary care physicians) demonstrated area under the curve of 0.864 (95% confidence interval = 0.818–0.909) and area under the curve of 0.902 (95% confidence interval = 0.85–0.95), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the 300 images were 0.827, 0.800, 0.959, and 0.450, respectively. We demonstrate a practical approach improving the image quality for clinical workflow. Although users may have to capture additional images, this is offset by the improved workload and efficiency for clinical teams.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667026724000328/pdfft?md5=3096c45a51c4538d05749966b424a85b&pid=1-s2.0-S2667026724000328-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667026724000328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667026724000328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用于临床评估的图像质量往往不尽如人意。我们的目标是开发一种图像质量分析工具,利用深度学习模型评估患者和主治医师来源的图像。数据集包括从 2018 年 8 月 21 日到 2022 年 6 月 30 日的患者和主治医生衍生图像,并带有 4 个独特的质量标签。根据输入数据对 VGG16 模型进行了微调,并根据尤登指数确定了最佳阈值。由于模型区分 2 个类别(好与坏),因此使用多数票将序数标签转换为二进制标签。阈值为 0.587 时,测试集的曲线下面积为 0.885(95% 置信区间 = 0.838-0.933);灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 0.829、0.784、0.906 和 0.645。对另外 300 张图像(来自患者和主治医生)的独立验证显示,曲线下面积分别为 0.864(95% 置信区间 = 0.818-0.909)和 0.902(95% 置信区间 = 0.85-0.95)。300 张图像的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 0.827、0.800、0.959 和 0.450。我们展示了一种提高临床工作流程图像质量的实用方法。虽然用户可能需要采集更多的图像,但临床团队的工作量和效率的提高抵消了这一损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Image Quality Assessment Using Convolutional Neural Network in Clinical Skin Images

The image quality received for clinical evaluation is often suboptimal. The goal is to develop an image quality analysis tool to assess patient- and primary care physician–derived images using deep learning model. Dataset included patient- and primary care physician–derived images from August 21, 2018 to June 30, 2022 with 4 unique quality labels. VGG16 model was fine tuned with input data, and optimal threshold was determined by Youden’s index. Ordinal labels were transformed to binary labels using a majority vote because model distinguishes between 2 categories (good vs bad). At a threshold of 0.587, area under the curve for the test set was 0.885 (95% confidence interval = 0.838–0.933); sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 0.829, 0.784, 0.906, and 0.645, respectively. Independent validation of 300 additional images (from patients and primary care physicians) demonstrated area under the curve of 0.864 (95% confidence interval = 0.818–0.909) and area under the curve of 0.902 (95% confidence interval = 0.85–0.95), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the 300 images were 0.827, 0.800, 0.959, and 0.450, respectively. We demonstrate a practical approach improving the image quality for clinical workflow. Although users may have to capture additional images, this is offset by the improved workload and efficiency for clinical teams.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cover 1 Corrigendum to ‘Proteomic Profiling of CCCA Reveals Role of Humoral Immune Response Pathway and Metabolic Dysregulation’ JID Innovations, Volume 4, Issue 3, May 2024, 100263 Identification of Associations with Dermatologic Diseases through a Focused GWAS of the UK Biobank From Plant to Patient: A Historical Perspective and Review of Selected Medicinal Plants in Dermatology Spatial Transcriptomics in Inflammatory Skin Diseases Using GeoMx Digital Spatial Profiling: A Practical Guide for Applications in Dermatology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1