委托在线搜索

IF 5.1 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1016/j.artint.2024.104171
Pirmin Braun , Niklas Hahn , Martin Hoefer , Conrad Schecker
{"title":"委托在线搜索","authors":"Pirmin Braun ,&nbsp;Niklas Hahn ,&nbsp;Martin Hoefer ,&nbsp;Conrad Schecker","doi":"10.1016/j.artint.2024.104171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In a delegation problem, a <em>principal</em> <span><math><mi>P</mi></math></span> with commitment power tries to pick one out of <em>n</em> options. Each option is drawn independently from a known distribution. Instead of inspecting the options herself, <span><math><mi>P</mi></math></span> delegates the information acquisition to a rational and self-interested <em>agent</em> <span><math><mi>A</mi></math></span>. After inspection, <span><math><mi>A</mi></math></span> proposes one of the options, and <span><math><mi>P</mi></math></span> can accept or reject.</p><p>Delegation is a classic setting in economic information design with many prominent applications, but the computational problems are only poorly understood. In this paper, we study a natural <em>online</em> variant of delegation, in which the agent searches through the options in an online fashion. For each option, he has to irrevocably decide if he wants to propose the current option or discard it, before seeing information on the next option(s). How can we design algorithms for <span><math><mi>P</mi></math></span> that approximate the utility of her best option in hindsight?</p><p>We show that in general <span><math><mi>P</mi></math></span> can obtain a <span><math><mi>Θ</mi><mo>(</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>/</mo><mi>n</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span>-approximation and extend this result to ratios of <span><math><mi>Θ</mi><mo>(</mo><mi>k</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>n</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span> in case (1) <span><math><mi>A</mi></math></span> has a lookahead of <em>k</em> rounds, or (2) <span><math><mi>A</mi></math></span> can propose up to <em>k</em> different options. We provide fine-grained bounds independent of <em>n</em> based on three parameters. If the ratio of maximum and minimum utility for <span><math><mi>A</mi></math></span> is bounded by a factor <em>α</em>, we obtain an <span><math><mi>Ω</mi><mo>(</mo><mi>log</mi><mo>⁡</mo><mi>log</mi><mo>⁡</mo><mi>α</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>log</mi><mo>⁡</mo><mi>α</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span>-approximation algorithm, and we show that this is best possible. Additionally, if <span><math><mi>P</mi></math></span> cannot distinguish options with the same value for herself, we show that ratios polynomial in <span><math><mn>1</mn><mo>/</mo><mi>α</mi></math></span> cannot be avoided. If there are at most <em>β</em> different utility values for <span><math><mi>A</mi></math></span>, we show a <span><math><mi>Θ</mi><mo>(</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>/</mo><mi>β</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span>-approximation. If the utilities of <span><math><mi>P</mi></math></span> and <span><math><mi>A</mi></math></span> for each option are related by a factor <em>γ</em>, we obtain an <span><math><mi>Ω</mi><mo>(</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>/</mo><mi>log</mi><mo>⁡</mo><mi>γ</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span>-approximation, where <span><math><mi>O</mi><mo>(</mo><mi>log</mi><mo>⁡</mo><mi>log</mi><mo>⁡</mo><mi>γ</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>log</mi><mo>⁡</mo><mi>γ</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span> is best possible.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8434,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004370224001073/pdfft?md5=2d7a00808c733af9db17db5a21fc73fe&pid=1-s2.0-S0004370224001073-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delegated online search\",\"authors\":\"Pirmin Braun ,&nbsp;Niklas Hahn ,&nbsp;Martin Hoefer ,&nbsp;Conrad Schecker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.artint.2024.104171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In a delegation problem, a <em>principal</em> <span><math><mi>P</mi></math></span> with commitment power tries to pick one out of <em>n</em> options. Each option is drawn independently from a known distribution. Instead of inspecting the options herself, <span><math><mi>P</mi></math></span> delegates the information acquisition to a rational and self-interested <em>agent</em> <span><math><mi>A</mi></math></span>. After inspection, <span><math><mi>A</mi></math></span> proposes one of the options, and <span><math><mi>P</mi></math></span> can accept or reject.</p><p>Delegation is a classic setting in economic information design with many prominent applications, but the computational problems are only poorly understood. In this paper, we study a natural <em>online</em> variant of delegation, in which the agent searches through the options in an online fashion. For each option, he has to irrevocably decide if he wants to propose the current option or discard it, before seeing information on the next option(s). How can we design algorithms for <span><math><mi>P</mi></math></span> that approximate the utility of her best option in hindsight?</p><p>We show that in general <span><math><mi>P</mi></math></span> can obtain a <span><math><mi>Θ</mi><mo>(</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>/</mo><mi>n</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span>-approximation and extend this result to ratios of <span><math><mi>Θ</mi><mo>(</mo><mi>k</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>n</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span> in case (1) <span><math><mi>A</mi></math></span> has a lookahead of <em>k</em> rounds, or (2) <span><math><mi>A</mi></math></span> can propose up to <em>k</em> different options. We provide fine-grained bounds independent of <em>n</em> based on three parameters. If the ratio of maximum and minimum utility for <span><math><mi>A</mi></math></span> is bounded by a factor <em>α</em>, we obtain an <span><math><mi>Ω</mi><mo>(</mo><mi>log</mi><mo>⁡</mo><mi>log</mi><mo>⁡</mo><mi>α</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>log</mi><mo>⁡</mo><mi>α</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span>-approximation algorithm, and we show that this is best possible. Additionally, if <span><math><mi>P</mi></math></span> cannot distinguish options with the same value for herself, we show that ratios polynomial in <span><math><mn>1</mn><mo>/</mo><mi>α</mi></math></span> cannot be avoided. If there are at most <em>β</em> different utility values for <span><math><mi>A</mi></math></span>, we show a <span><math><mi>Θ</mi><mo>(</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>/</mo><mi>β</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span>-approximation. If the utilities of <span><math><mi>P</mi></math></span> and <span><math><mi>A</mi></math></span> for each option are related by a factor <em>γ</em>, we obtain an <span><math><mi>Ω</mi><mo>(</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>/</mo><mi>log</mi><mo>⁡</mo><mi>γ</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span>-approximation, where <span><math><mi>O</mi><mo>(</mo><mi>log</mi><mo>⁡</mo><mi>log</mi><mo>⁡</mo><mi>γ</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>log</mi><mo>⁡</mo><mi>γ</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span> is best possible.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004370224001073/pdfft?md5=2d7a00808c733af9db17db5a21fc73fe&pid=1-s2.0-S0004370224001073-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004370224001073\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004370224001073","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在委托问题中,具有承诺权的委托人 P 试图从 n 个选项中选出一个。每个选项都是从已知分布中独立抽取的。委托是经济信息设计中的一个经典设置,有许多突出的应用,但对其计算问题的理解却很有限。在本文中,我们研究了委托的一个自然在线变体,即代理人以在线方式搜索选项。对于每个选项,在看到下一个或多个选项的信息之前,他必须不可逆转地决定是提出当前选项还是放弃当前选项。我们的研究表明,一般情况下,P 可以获得 Θ(1/n)-xapproximation 并将这一结果扩展到 Θ(k/n) 的比率,即 (1) A 有 k 轮的前瞻性,或 (2) A 最多可以提出 k 个不同的选项。我们根据三个参数提供了与 n 无关的细粒度界限。如果 A 的最大效用和最小效用之比以系数 α 为界,我们就能得到一个 Ω(logα/logα)近似算法,并证明这是最好的算法。此外,如果 P 无法区分自身具有相同价值的选项,我们将证明无法避免 1/α 多项式的比率。如果 A 至多有 β 个不同的效用值,我们将展示一个 Θ(1/β)- 近似值。如果每个选项中 P 和 A 的效用值的相关系数为 γ,我们可以得到 Ω(1/logγ)-近似值,其中 O(loglogγ/logγ)是最佳值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Delegated online search

In a delegation problem, a principal P with commitment power tries to pick one out of n options. Each option is drawn independently from a known distribution. Instead of inspecting the options herself, P delegates the information acquisition to a rational and self-interested agent A. After inspection, A proposes one of the options, and P can accept or reject.

Delegation is a classic setting in economic information design with many prominent applications, but the computational problems are only poorly understood. In this paper, we study a natural online variant of delegation, in which the agent searches through the options in an online fashion. For each option, he has to irrevocably decide if he wants to propose the current option or discard it, before seeing information on the next option(s). How can we design algorithms for P that approximate the utility of her best option in hindsight?

We show that in general P can obtain a Θ(1/n)-approximation and extend this result to ratios of Θ(k/n) in case (1) A has a lookahead of k rounds, or (2) A can propose up to k different options. We provide fine-grained bounds independent of n based on three parameters. If the ratio of maximum and minimum utility for A is bounded by a factor α, we obtain an Ω(loglogα/logα)-approximation algorithm, and we show that this is best possible. Additionally, if P cannot distinguish options with the same value for herself, we show that ratios polynomial in 1/α cannot be avoided. If there are at most β different utility values for A, we show a Θ(1/β)-approximation. If the utilities of P and A for each option are related by a factor γ, we obtain an Ω(1/logγ)-approximation, where O(loglogγ/logγ) is best possible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Artificial Intelligence (AIJ) welcomes papers covering a broad spectrum of AI topics, including cognition, automated reasoning, computer vision, machine learning, and more. Papers should demonstrate advancements in AI and propose innovative approaches to AI problems. Additionally, the journal accepts papers describing AI applications, focusing on how new methods enhance performance rather than reiterating conventional approaches. In addition to regular papers, AIJ also accepts Research Notes, Research Field Reviews, Position Papers, Book Reviews, and summary papers on AI challenges and competitions.
期刊最新文献
Integration of memory systems supporting non-symbolic representations in an architecture for lifelong development of artificial agents Editorial Board PathLAD+: Towards effective exact methods for subgraph isomorphism problem Interval abstractions for robust counterfactual explanations Approximating problems in abstract argumentation with graph convolutional networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1